Joseph McCarthy (1908–57) was a Republican Senator from Wisconsin from 1947. By 1950 everyone in the U.S knew McCarthy, at the very time when the Senator both promoted and tackled Cold War fears of nation-wide Communist treason. As might have been expected, he argued over and over again that many fellow-travellers had infiltrated the Federal government. The term McCarthyism was soon applied to many dodgy right wing actions from that era.
But how did McCarthyism try to control the film industry? José Ferrer (1912–92) was born into an accomplished, educated family in Puerto Rico. They emigrated to the USA when José was in primary school where he played piano at a very skilled level, and got into Princeton at a very young age. Then he studied for a year in a Swiss boarding school.
Back in America, when Ferrer wasn’t working, he supported various progressive causes. He fought against segregation in DC, attended crisis meetings on atomic energy and foreign policy, and signed a letter in 1947 condemning the House of Un-American Activities Committee aka HUAC. Remember this letter! It denigrated the HUAC investigations into Hollywood which was already building up a blacklist of entertainers with so-called communist leanings.
After finishing university, Ferrer began working in theatre, starting as a stage manager then moving up as an actor in Broadway. He had a small role in a 1940 comedy, but it was playing Iago in a 1943 production of Othello, with Paul Robeson, that made Ferrer’s name well known.
After impressive successes on stage, Ferrer broke into Hollywood five years later, with his performance as the Dauphin in the 1948 film Joan of Arc. It was his first film role, and he was immediately nominated for an Oscar as Best Supporting Actor in 1949.
It was Cyrano de Bergerac that got José Ferrer an Academy Award nomination for Best Actor in 1951. But his career was threatened by the anti-Communist hysteria in the 1950s, led by the said Sen Joseph McCarthy. Magazines had speculated in the lead-up to the Academy Awards that paranoia about Communism could influence the outcome for the first time in Oscar history. This was even more probable, once a teachers’ association rescinded an award to Ferrer for his Cyrano performance. Note, however, that many papers argued the problem for Hispanics who were nominated for Academy Awards concerned their ethnic origins, and had nothing to do with their politics.
On the night of the 1951 Oscar ceremony, José Ferrer was in New York, rehearsing his next show with Gloria Swanson. So when Helen Hayes announced that he had won Best Actor for his role in Cyrano de Bergerac, Ferrer delivered his very proud acceptance speech from a nightclub in Manhattan.
Yet Ferrer’s future in Hollywood remained ambivalent. Just as he was being handed Hollywood’s highest honour, making him the first Spanish speaking actor to win an Oscar, Ferrer was being investigated by the House Un-American Activities Committee. Apparently he was considered too left-wing, too progressive, too difficult, too intellectual.
The 1951 hearings, Senator McCarthy labelled many witnesses as Fifth Amendment Communists. After the Supreme Court ruled that invoking The Fifth was not permissible, witnesses had to choose between defending their past actions and implicating other people – inform on family and colleagues Vs face a prison sentence. The HUAC called 90 witnesses in 1951, including Jose Ferrer.
Ferrer’s name already appeared in Red Channels, a booklet published for the first time in 1950 that listed names of entertainment industry professionals suspected of communist sympathies. Walter Winchell and gossip columnist Hedda Hopper kept a file on Ferrer’s political activities and suggested new names to add to Red Channels.
When Sen McCarthy named his black list, Jose Ferrer refused to co-operate.
Conclusion The Academy wanted to be culturally inclusive but when Ferrer won an Oscar in 1951 with an un-Anglicised name, he was the first Hispanic to do so. So why has the Academy been so intractable to this day? Ferrer might’ve seen his award as a vote of confidence in his very special acting skills, but Hollywood clearly disagreed. McCarthyism was a more powerful deciding factor.
But how did McCarthyism try to control the film industry? José Ferrer (1912–92) was born into an accomplished, educated family in Puerto Rico. They emigrated to the USA when José was in primary school where he played piano at a very skilled level, and got into Princeton at a very young age. Then he studied for a year in a Swiss boarding school.
Back in America, when Ferrer wasn’t working, he supported various progressive causes. He fought against segregation in DC, attended crisis meetings on atomic energy and foreign policy, and signed a letter in 1947 condemning the House of Un-American Activities Committee aka HUAC. Remember this letter! It denigrated the HUAC investigations into Hollywood which was already building up a blacklist of entertainers with so-called communist leanings.
After finishing university, Ferrer began working in theatre, starting as a stage manager then moving up as an actor in Broadway. He had a small role in a 1940 comedy, but it was playing Iago in a 1943 production of Othello, with Paul Robeson, that made Ferrer’s name well known.
After impressive successes on stage, Ferrer broke into Hollywood five years later, with his performance as the Dauphin in the 1948 film Joan of Arc. It was his first film role, and he was immediately nominated for an Oscar as Best Supporting Actor in 1949.
Lloyd Corrigan and José Ferrer (right) in Cyrano de Bergerac, 1950
Wiki
It was Cyrano de Bergerac that got José Ferrer an Academy Award nomination for Best Actor in 1951. But his career was threatened by the anti-Communist hysteria in the 1950s, led by the said Sen Joseph McCarthy. Magazines had speculated in the lead-up to the Academy Awards that paranoia about Communism could influence the outcome for the first time in Oscar history. This was even more probable, once a teachers’ association rescinded an award to Ferrer for his Cyrano performance. Note, however, that many papers argued the problem for Hispanics who were nominated for Academy Awards concerned their ethnic origins, and had nothing to do with their politics.
On the night of the 1951 Oscar ceremony, José Ferrer was in New York, rehearsing his next show with Gloria Swanson. So when Helen Hayes announced that he had won Best Actor for his role in Cyrano de Bergerac, Ferrer delivered his very proud acceptance speech from a nightclub in Manhattan.
Yet Ferrer’s future in Hollywood remained ambivalent. Just as he was being handed Hollywood’s highest honour, making him the first Spanish speaking actor to win an Oscar, Ferrer was being investigated by the House Un-American Activities Committee. Apparently he was considered too left-wing, too progressive, too difficult, too intellectual.
When Ferrer was called to testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee, he was repeatedly questioned about his support for the Republican cause in Spain. Did he give a fund-raising speech for the Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee back in 1944? Did he appear at the Spanish Refugee Appeal in 1945? Was he a sponsor of the American Committee for Spanish Freedom in 1946?
The 1951 hearings, Senator McCarthy labelled many witnesses as Fifth Amendment Communists. After the Supreme Court ruled that invoking The Fifth was not permissible, witnesses had to choose between defending their past actions and implicating other people – inform on family and colleagues Vs face a prison sentence. The HUAC called 90 witnesses in 1951, including Jose Ferrer.
Ferrer’s name already appeared in Red Channels, a booklet published for the first time in 1950 that listed names of entertainment industry professionals suspected of communist sympathies. Walter Winchell and gossip columnist Hedda Hopper kept a file on Ferrer’s political activities and suggested new names to add to Red Channels.
1950, Biblio
Ferrer had to defend his "communist beliefs" in 1951 when he was subpoenaed by the HUAC. He clearly understood that the HUAC could ruin an individual’s career. So at his hearing he told them he recognised that some of the organisations he’d supported in the past might have been connected to communism. But he knew nothing of their links. Ultimately Ferrer was “cleared”. Now I wonder why.
But it didn’t help. Ferrer still struggled to find consistent work and he knew that he was seen as a box-office problem. Yet sometimes he starred - in 1953 he was nominated again for the Best Actor Award, this time for Moulin Rouge.
But it didn’t help. Ferrer still struggled to find consistent work and he knew that he was seen as a box-office problem. Yet sometimes he starred - in 1953 he was nominated again for the Best Actor Award, this time for Moulin Rouge.
Home life was also unstable. Ferrer married Rosemary Clooney twice (1961 & 1967), amongst his five weddings. But he continued acting and directing into his 70s, and received many other honours, including the National Medal of Arts. Alas Ferrer’s treatment in Hollywood was never predictable.
Conclusion The Academy wanted to be culturally inclusive but when Ferrer won an Oscar in 1951 with an un-Anglicised name, he was the first Hispanic to do so. So why has the Academy been so intractable to this day? Ferrer might’ve seen his award as a vote of confidence in his very special acting skills, but Hollywood clearly disagreed. McCarthyism was a more powerful deciding factor.
22 comments:
Was there no governmental oversight of McCarthy and his team?
If Ferrer was born in the USA, rather than emigrating at 5, would he have been less foreign?
Deb
I don't understand this either. After McCarthy’s reelection in 1952, he became chairman of the Committee on Government Operations of the Senate. Yet did the Senate not oversee his investigations?
In two years in the spotlight, he investigated various government departments and questioned endless witnesses about their communism, proving nothing but ruining peoples’ careers. Only during 36 days of investigative hearings on national tv, McCarthy was disgraced _in public_, and only then censured by his fellow senators in Dec 1954.
Joe
At 5 little Jose would not have remembered his parents and grandparents' houses in Puerto Rico, would not have had an accent in English and would have had his entire education in the US!! Out of his 80 years on this planet, he lived some 5 years in Puerto Rico, 1 year in Switzerland and 74 years in the US.
The shocking and disgraceful US extremism we are seeing now and have seen during the Trump years is not new. While I am thoroughly a capitalist, communism is legitimate political thought and not criminal.
Andrew
The Cold War was marked by endless rivalry between the two former WW2 allies. McCarthy became noticed in Feb 1950 when he stated that 205 communists had infiltrated the State Department. But before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, he proved unable to name a single communist governmental worker! Nevertheless it only strengthened McCarthy’s belief in secret communism! To half the country he appeared as a dedicated patriot and guardian of America. To the other half, he was a vicious witch-hunter who didn’t give a toss about civil liberties. This sounds exactly like Thump.
Helen have a look at this very early report.
The House Un-American Activities Committee last week issued another report on the doings of U.S Reds and their supporters. The theme of this report was The Communist Peace Offensive, and the committeemen listed 350+ prominent U.S citizens—scientists, artists and clerics who had signed up for peace Russian-style. Well up on the list: Oscar Winners Jose (Cyrano de Bergerac) Ferrer and Judy (Born Yesterday) Holliday. Both actors, said the committee, had been affiliated with from 5-10 Communist-front organizations, and Ferrer was also accused of giving "open support to Communist candidates in election campaigns." Both Actors Ferrer and Holliday promptly denied all.
With the reopening of committee hearings in Washington this week, they will get their chance to make their denials on the record. Meanwhile, said the committee, it would be only too happy to correct its report in the case of anyone whose name had been used by the Communists without permission.
Time Magazine, Monday Apr. 16 1951
https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,814738,00.html
Time
thank you! Unbelievable! I already knew about the Red Channels list, the 1950 publication of entertainment industry professionals supposedly connected with communist sympathies. But I assumed Red Channels would not be released to the public until the House of Un-American Activities Committee looked for proof of communism and presented that proof to the Senate.
So why did Time publish the accusations, name by name, to the widest audience? Communism wasn't even illegal until 1954! But even if Communism was illegal, why didn't Time wait for reliable proof?
What on earth are knee shoes? Did they help a tall actor act as the tiny Toulouse Lautrec?
Craftsman
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec was a 4’8” dwarf and Ferrer was a 5’11” giant. The solution: Ferrer played the part on his knees i.e the knee boots enabled Ferrer to shuffle. The leather boots supported Ferrer's upper leg when his knees were bent. The tight boots were supported by a canvas shoulder harness, which pulled the calves of both legs tightly against his thighs and cut off blood circulation :( The fake shoes were fitted to the bottom of the knees.. so only front camera angles were used.
Boa noite minha querida amiga. Parabéns pelo seu excelente trabalho e matéria. Aprendi com você um pouco mais. Boa quinta-feira.
I have read a little bit about McCarthy as I did not grow up in the US – it was a bad time here and it seems funny to me that the former president was such a friend of Russia's Putin and still defends him to this day. As for Jose Ferrer I knew little about him and have never seen any of his films, I will try to find some of them as he sounds like a fantastic actor.
Luiz
I remember the politics of the 1950s very well, because my grandparents and parents were very politically involved. But you are correct.... we learn more with every post.
Vagabonde,
If you see Cyrano de Bergerac (1950), Moulin Rouge (1952), The Caine Mutiny (1954) etc, you will appreciate why Ferrer was awarded Academy Awards etc. Even if you find these films are a bit dated now.
Senator McCarthy's campaign continued on into 1953, shifting its focus from investigating fraud in the Executive Branch to hunting for Communists, whether or not he had any evidence of illegal behaviour. Famous lives were ruined.
Thump has taken a page from McCarthy, in claiming without any proof the election was stolen. Both are con men, making believer’s out of total falsehoods. And like before, destroying people unfairly. Really sad for democracy.
William
I see the comparison, but as immoral and as irresponsible as McCarthy was, he couldn't compare with Trump for criminality. The Guardian wrote:
Here are all the ex-President's legal cases as of 1 February 2022:
Insurrection/conspiring to incite the violence at the Capitol (7), Financial/tax evasion (6), Election interference (2), Sexual misconduct/rape and Other (3)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2022/feb/07/donald-trump-list-legal-cases
Bom final de semana com muita paz e saúde minha querida amiga.
Luiz
were you familiar with this awful era of American history? And were you familiar with Ferrer, the first Hispanic actor to win an Oscar?
Wow another corker of a post . I went down the rabbit hole and discovered my about McCarthy . What a very unfortunate human being . I had no idea that he was so complicated in his awfulness. I wonder if Mel Ferrer was related to Jose??
mem
Melchor Gastón Ferrer was the child of a Spanish-speaking father from Cuba, and was not at all related to José Ferrer of Puerto Rico.
I can't find any records of the House of Un-American Activities Committee going after Mel Ferrer, but I do wonder why this progressive talented actor and director chose to live in Mexico and then in Europe in the late 1940s and into the 1950s. The atmosphere in the U.S must have seemed appalling.
Yea the Americans seem to have not moved far from the psychology of witch burning . They are moving down that road again . I wonder though if it also causes a mighty reaction and a correction back onto the middle road . It such a big country with such extremes of views, maybe this is its organic adaptation to keep things middleing which is probably the safest path to be on .
mem
I agree about extreme views and behaviours, and the inability to bring one nation together. So for example if a racist gunmen kills heaps of shoppers in New York, with the support of powerful gun rights associations, there is not a lot that can be done.
But the House Un-American Activities Committee was specifically _set up by the Federal Government_ to conduct investigations through the 1940s and ’50s into alleged communist activities. Then punishments followed, without police or court involvement. How can a Federal Government allow its own committees to terrorise its citizens?
Post a Comment