Intellectual and political democracy
The Weimar era was noted for these amazing successes:
1.Political power was rested in the Reichstag
2.Universal voting for men & women made for a genuine democracy
3.unemployment insurance was introduced
4.the working week was reduced from 50 hours down to 46.
5.free speech was guaranteed.
6.freedom of religion was guaranteed
7.sciences were promoted in the universities and scientists supported at work
Arts The Bauhaus Academy opened in 1919 where expressionist artists overcame the rigid traditions of the main art academies; the new style which flourished in the German-speaking nations was characterised by distorted forms, sharp colour contrasts, dark shadows, weird angles and distorted identities. Bauhaus was great for young architects when a new wave of designers followed Walter Gropius (1883-1969) instead of traditional or classical architects. It followed a new post-war Western spirit when cultural modernity would be Germany’s reparations to the world. Did it reflect the complicated German society when the learned Weimar Republic suffered high inflation?
In Berlin post-WW1, Christian
Schad became an model of New Objectivity, painting cool, sharp portraits of his social milieu. He painted the androgynous Sonja, with fashionable clothes, cropped hair and smoking Camel cigarettes, all attributes of the independent New Woman. New Objectivity spread through various cities, creating cynical depictions of injured war veterans, jobless workers and war profiteers. They portrayed an scarred society, denouncing the devastating effects of WW1.
Many works railed against both capitalism and the effects of WW1 on society. Otto Dix’s anti-militarist The Skat Players 1920 marked his transition to the socially critical New Realism, depicting 3 hideously disfigured officers in a café playing skat card game. And Dix completed 4 panels in a triptych, like a church altarpiece, depicting horrid morbidity with putrefied flesh, gangrene and death. Was Dix reflecting the German nationalism that was surging in the more tense political atmosphere in the Depression? His critics certainly hated his anti-German, hypercritical views of WW1 and post-war society.
Weimar Republic
Films Through the 1920s Fritz Lang made ambitious films, including the allegorical melodrama Destiny (1921) and Dr Mabuse The Gambler (1922). In 1924 he first travelled to film companies in New York and Hollywood. Lang’s first project back in Germany was the futuristic, expensive master-piece Metropolis (1927). The plot showed a repressive society with exploited workers, lazy rulers and emotionless robots. Lang created his visually detailed films where he blended shots of miniatures with live action. After a crime film Spies in 1928, Lang returned to science fiction for Woman in the Moon (1929). M (1931) was a German thriller, famous for its horrifying lighting and sound. It was Fritz Lang’s first sound film, starring a chilling Peter Lorre, Lang’s greatest global success.
Wedekind’s early play formed the basis for Viennese director G W Pabst's famous silent film Pandora's Box in 1929 starring Louise Brooks as Lulu, a masterpiece of C20th opera. Fritz Kohn-Kortner was an Austrian stage-actor who became one of the era's most famous silent actors. Talkies arrived in late 1929, producing a flourish of German film. Sound production and distribution were quickly taken up and soon Germany had 3,800 cinemas with sound. G.W Pabst's version of Bertolt Brecht's The Three-penny Opera 1931 and Lang's M 1931 were landmark talkies.
So what was the impact of Weimar democracy and cultural dominance? The Weimar Years: Rise and Fall 1918-1933 by Frank McDonough suggested that finding a detailed narrative history of Weimar Germany was tricky. Other writers focused on specific aspects of the era where the rise of Adolf Hitler dominated history. Fortunately The Weimar Years was NOT a history of Hitler’s rise to power.
“The first important man was Chancellor and Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann, the man McDonough considered the only politician who could have saved German democracy. Stresemann’s diplomatic skills inspired political compromise within the Republic, while his peaceful foreign policy vision triumphed at Locarno, sparking a new spirit of friendship towards Germany and winning him the Nobel Peace Prize before his death in 1929”. I had never heard this mentioned.
“The second was President Paul von Hindenburg, widely seen in the 1920s as a hero. Initially non-partisan, the old monarchist and ex-military leader soon reverted to the right. From 1930 he governed in accordance with his right-wing preferences and gave little thought to the views of the elected Reichstag. But as McDonough argued, the blame did not lie with individuals: there were structural issues with Weimar democracy baked into its constitution, Article 48 of which enabled Hindenburg to disregard the Reichstag. Proportional representation made coalition government difficult. Issues with the system, more than the economic misery, inspired Germans to vote for the Nazis. So the mortal damage was dealt by Hindenburg.
4 comments:
Hello Hels, The short-lived Weimar Republic had its high points, but as you also point out, it perhaps contained the seeds of its own destruction. It was followed by the most depraved episode in human history. It seems as though history might be repeating itself, many current world leaders tearing to shreds anything with intellect, fairness, culture, or dignity, and actively working towards a new low level of barbarism.
--Jim
I recently read about Angela Merkel's past efforts to navigate the political landscape in a manner reminiscent of the Weimar Republic. Are we at risk of experiencing the subsequent disaster?
I know so little about the Weimar Republic that I found this post really interesting especially the 7 very positive aims .
Not a topic I knew anything at all about, so found this really interesting it sounds like it had its good points and its not so good points which is like so many times in history.
Post a Comment