16 January 2024

2024 - great year for Tamara de Lempicka!

Madonna will showcase Lempicka’s art on her Celebration Concert Tour, Lempicka The Musical on Broadway in Mar 2024. An exhibit­ion at San Francisco’s Legion of Honour Museum will reevaluate her style in art history by int­rod­ucing 1920-30s Paris culture. And a documentary The True Story of Tamara De Lempicka & the Art of Survival will appear in 2024! What a year!! 

Portrait Of Dr Boucard 1929
with test tube and microscope.

Maria Gorzka (1898-1980) was born in ?Moscow, dau­ghter of a Russian Jew­ish solicitor for a French trading comp­any, Boris Górs­ki. After her parents divorc­ed, Maria lived with grand­ma on the French Riv­ie­ra. In a St Pe­t­­ersburg opera in 1914, Maria met Tad­eusz Lempicki (1888–1951), a hand­some law­y­er of noble family. 2 years later they mar­­r­ied in St Pet­ersburg with her banker-uncle giving the dowry. A year later Tad­uesz was arrested by the Bolsheviks; Tamara got him freed and the couple and baby fled to Paris, with other wealthy White Russ­ians. 

Mad­ame Bouc­ard in  lavish silk, jew­els and mink
1931

In her early Pa­ris life, she enrolled at Académie de la Grande Chaum­ière and ab­sor­bed the Old Masters, especially Bronzino. She drew on the Cubism of her Paris con­tempor­aries and French Deco cr­eated a glam­orous Paris epitomising Tamara's life and art. Her mentor was artist-critic André Lhote, creator of a gent­ly coloured Cub­ism.

Deco made great progress in fine arts and industrial designs, bas­ed on simple format, clean lines and viv­id colours. The improve­ment of tech­nology, in industries like cars, ships and tr­ains, emp­h­asised stylised angular forms. Lempicka found soul mates in fas­h­­ion illustrator Erte, glass artist Rene Lalique and designer Cass­an­d­re. Lempicka found her place as a port­raitist of the era's beaut­iful peop­le, mixing with André Gide, Col­­ette and Jean Cocteau. Although marr­ied with a daugh­ter, Tamara was busy having romantic involve­ments with both genders, patrons and models. And because tourism was ma­king Montmartre too crowded and expensive, most art­ists gradually moved to Mont­parnasse with its wide boul­ev­ards and small courtyards. Pablo Pic­asso, Con­stantin Bran­cu­si, Jac­ques Lipchitz, Tris­tan Tzara & Piet Mondrian we­re Tamara's neigh­bours in this cen­tre of art studios.

By 1923 she exhibited in small galleries. Her work was shown at the 1924 Pa­r­is Salon des Femmes Artistes Modernes, and in 1925 she had her first Milan solo. Her soc­ial life also blos­somed, displaying Tamara’s skill in winning many men and women lovers, her models and patrons. See the wo­men reclin­ing, bath­ing, hug­ging or stroking.

En­cour­ag­ed by Coco Chanel  and the Fl­appers, Tamara went to ch­ap­er­­one-free parties, sm­oked and drove cars. The 1920s flat dresses provid­ed an ideal canvas to dis­play Deco taste. In 1927 Lemp­icka re­ceived 1st prize at the Exposition Internat­ionale des Beaux-Arts for the portrait of her daughter Kizette on the Balcony, and divorced.

The Girl In Green With Glov­es (1929 Musée Nat­ional d'Art Moderne Paris) was a fam­ous work that cl­early epit­omised Deco and flowing curves. See the self-portrait Tamara in the Green Bug­atti (1929), in leather helmet and gloves. It was the cover of a Ger­man Women's Li­berat­ion magazine Die Dame: tight, post-cubist des­ign; muted col­our; sp­eed; glamour; Her­mès helmet; leather driving gloves! F Scott Fitz­g­er­ald popularised sporty outfits; and clothes and hats were desig­ned for ships, trains or cars. Jean Patou, Ma­d­­eleine Vionnet and Elsa Schiap­­ar­elli created excellent moving styles.

Examine Lempicka's males. The huge portrait of Duke Gabriel Const­ant­inov­ich (1926) wore a gold-braid­ed un­iform and empty face. Count Fürstenberg Herd­ringen 1928 was a glass-eyed monster in a French navy beret. In the late 1920s her most import­ant patron was flashy medico Dr Pierre Boucard (1929) who already owned some Lempicka nudes. Boucard gave her a 2-year contract to paint family portr­aits.

This new income bought a Left Bank 3-sorey studio house in Rue Me­ch­ain; grey int­er­ior, chrome fittings & American cock­tail bar gave Lempicka her sett­ing. On the easel was the port­r­ait of Mad­ame Bouc­ard (1931), a complex work done by this connoisseur of text­iles, jew­els, hairstyles and mink boa. In Port­rait of Madame M 1931, Tam­ara showed sleekness .  

Tamara sold her expensive portraits to Paris’ rich aristocracy. She painted writ­ers, entert­ainers, artists and Eastern Eur­ope's ex­iled nobility. One of her wea­l­thiest patrons Baron Raoul Kuff­ner (1886–1961) owned vast estates donat­ed to his brewer family by Emp­eror Franz-Josef for supplying the Hapsb­urg court. Kuffner asked Tamara to paint a port­rait of his mistress Andalusian dan­cer Nana de Herrera but while painting the Baron’s port­rait, Lempicka got involved with him, re­plac­ed his mistress and married him in 1934

La Music­ienne 1929

Lempicka understood political chaos, and enc­ouraged her husband to secure his assets. So Kuffner sold his Hungarian estates. When WW2 started in 1939, the coup­le left Paris and moved to Holly­wood. They lived in film director King Vidor’s old home, and Tamara soon bec­ame an artist of Hollywood's screen stars. Lempicka also bus­ied herself with war relief work and after an ext­ended st­ruggle, resc­ued her daughter Kizette from Nazi-occupied Par­is in 1941. In 1943 they cont­inued to soc­ialise in N.Y, al­though her art out­put reduced; conservatism st­arted to ch­allenge the fem­in­ist ad­van­ces she’d championed. Nonethe­less when WW2 end­ed, she reop­ened her famous Paris studio.

When the Baron died in 1961, Tamara sold up and sailed away. Then she moved to Houston Tx to be closer to her daught­er and produced abstract paint­ings to remain in-step with cur­rent art. Only in 1966 did Musee des Arts Decorat­ifs open her memor­ial exh­ib­ition, then Al­ain Blondel open­ed Galerie du Lux­embourg with a major Lempicka re­tr­ospective in 1972. But in 1978 she moved to Mex­ico, bought a special house and died in 1980.

Madame M sold for $6.13 million at Christie's NY in 2009. Lempicka's auc­t­ion record, $9.1m, was set by Chris­tie’s in 2018 for La Music­ienne (1929) showing a mandolin player in vivid blue. A new record was set when La Tun­ique Rose (1927) earned $13.3m at Sotheby’s N.Y in 2019. Now Por­trait de Marjorie Fer­ry (Paris, 1932) earned £16.4 in Chris­­t­ie’s London in 2020!! Many thanks to theartstory

 stylish Bar Lempicka in Amsterdam
See the Art Deco glass mosaic on the ceiling
and the Lempicka name on the facade

27 comments:

Mandy said...

How interesting - I don't think I've encountered this artist before. I love her work - we have very little wall space left in our house but I feel I'm going to have to buy a print. Her life story is quite extraordinary too

jabblog said...

Her paintings are very cinematic. What a vivid life she lived.

roentare said...

These paintings look so good. Thanks for the introduction of her arts!

Student of History said...

I cannot remember Tamara de Lempicka ever being mentioned in the Art History lectures I attended. Now I have had a good look at Bathing Nudes and think that perhaps the university lecturers thought it was 1920s pornography.

Hels said...

Mandy

I was wondering why English speaking art fans might have been very familiar with Paul Klee, Diego Rivera, Frida Kahlo, Wassily Kandinsky, Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, Georgia O'Keeffe, Marc Chagall etc. Artists from very different countries and from both males and females. But not Tamara de Lempicka.

Presumably all artists' reputations rise and fall, so I suppose we would only know of her work if we studied/collected her during her periods of fame.

Hels said...

jabblog

de Lempicka certainly did live a very vivid life. She carefully chose her friends, clothes, parties and sexual partners to be dramatic and noticed. Nothing was accidental.

Hels said...

roentare

if you have the time, read https://www.theartstory.org/artist/de-lempicka-tamara/
We all still have more to learn :)

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, I am familiar with the artwork and the name of Tamara de Lempicka, but I never put the two together. Thank you for providing this background story, and info about her reascendance. I just looked up more images of her work, and while there is variety it is all imbued with her trademark style.
--Jim

Hels said...

Student

our lecturers never had any trouble discussing paintings of a single naked woman, painted by a male painter. The only problem seemed to arise when a female painter depicted naked females together, groping and resting over each other.

Hels said...

Parnassus

she was a _very_ prolific artist. And even those who are familiar with Lempicka's works probably still haven't seen very many of them. Until 2023, for example, I had never seen any portraits of her daughter Kizette.

Luiz Gomes said...

Boa tarde de terça-feira minha querida amiga. Espero um dia ver esses trabalhos, aqui no Rio de Janeiro.

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

Art that look familiar but not art I know anything about but let's be honest I know nothing about art or artists

Liam Ryan said...

Very interesting to read. Thanks.
I will try to catch that documentary. She travelled far, and experienced a lot.
The girl in green with gloves is amazing :)

My name is Erika. said...

This art is really amazing. I haven't heard of de Lempicka, but she had a lot of talent.

Hels said...

Luiz

you might like to read SLEEK WORDS: ART DECO AND BRAZILIAN MODERNISM by Patricia Soler who explored Art Deco in the Brazilian Modernist movement during the 1920s. Lempicka played a significant role.

Hels said...

Jo-Anne

if you are interested in cultural studies of the 1919-1939 era, you will find her work (and other artists' work) totally fascinating.

Hels said...

Ryan

she lived in Russia, Poland, France, US and Mexico and worked often in Italy. Except for her last years, she was the most well-travelled, most committed and most prolific artist I knew. I don't think her daughter even recognised her mother's face.

Girl in Green with Gloves, at Paris' Musée national d’art modern, is modestly dressed but gorgeously curved underneath. I loved it.

Hels said...

Erika,

you are not alone. I am guessing that many art history graduates don't know the name Tamara de Lempicka. Mind you, after seeing her work once or twice, art fans never forget her paintings again.

Margaret D said...

Enjoyed reading about the Lady. The only way to show life was to paint, now it's photos and everyone has access to take a photo instead of painting.

Hels said...

Margaret

I enjoyed writing about her :)
I think Lempicka could show her own feelings about her models in painting, more flexibly than she could have achieved with photos. Her men were more solid than they may have been in life; her women's nipples stood out, even though the models were fully dressed; Woman in a Green Bugatti looked more self-confident than any photo of a woman driver might have looked in the 1920s.

DUTA said...

As a portratist of beautiful people, and as someone with a rich love life, who smoked and drove a car, Lempicka probably attracted great attention in various circles of society, in many places, but not for the right reaons. Anyway, I never heard of her.

hels said...

DUTA
How did artists get noticed, especially early in their careers? Especially women whose works may have escaped public attention via the normal methods eg public galleries, auction houses, portrait commissions from wealthy families etc. de Lempicka had to create her own fame/infamy, as much by her lifestyle as by her art works. Of course she paid a (hefty) price.

ARTnews said...

See "A Marie Laurencin Exhibition Offers a View into the Lesbian Circles of 1920s Paris", by KAREN CHERNICK. Laurencin's reasons for painting women differed from those of her male peers. One could easily look at her canvases and see a saccharine world of woodland fairies wearing chiffon. Look closer, though, and you’ll find a female-dominated realm where men neither belong nor are welcome, the kind of realm preferred in the lesbian circles of 1920s Paris. Yet her work was quite different from that of Tamara de Lempicka, another artist active in Parisian lesbian circles at the time, whose erotic paintings of women were more obvious than Laurencin’s.

ARTnews
https://www.artnews.com/list/art-news/artists/marie-laurencin-artist-who-is-why-art-important-barnes-foundation-exhibition-1234692934/

Britta said...

What an interesting life! So vivid, so flashy, so fast! Absolutely fascinating - as her wonderful paintings.
I didn't know that she knew Colette (whom I adore). Thank you , Helen, for giving so many informations about a great artist!

Hels said...

ARTnews

I am very grateful for you suggesting a comparison between Marie Laurencin (1883–1956) and Tamara de Lempicka (1898-1980). It goes to show that sexual politics are only one aspect that influenced the art of these women in the 1920s and 30s.
Hopefully other readers will follow up your reference.

Hels said...

Britta

Not only was de Lempicka a vivid, flashy and fascinating artist. She was also a risk taker, at a time when most women artists tried to achieve success in their field traditionally.

Apollo Magazine said...

Painted in Paris in the 1920s and 30s, Tamara de Lempicka’s glamorous portraits of the city’s socialites have become synonymous with art deco. Though these are considered the defining works of the artist’s career, Lempicka’s oeuvre demonstrates an impressive breadth, comprising sensual nudes, subdued floral still lifes and melancholic religious scenes. 150+ of these works are brought together at the de Young Museum in San Francisco, which has the first major retrospective of the Polish artist in the United States (12 Oct–9 Feb 2025).