15 November 2022

British workhouses - charity or prison?

After the Dissolution (1536-41), several laws were passed in order to alleviate poverty. Basically they were designed to prov­ide work for the poor, shelter for the old and sick, and pun­ishment for vagrants and beggars. Each parish was made responsible for its own poor and dispossessed, leading to the common expression Living on the Parish. Funds for this were collected by taxing those who owned and occupied property, the forerunner of Council Taxes. Ratepayers elected parish overseers who administered Relief, as assistance to the poor became known.

With the arrival of the 1601 Poor Relief Act, measures included plans for the construction of homes for the elderly or sick. The C17th wit­nessed an increase in state involve­ment in poverty, and further Acts were brought in, helping to formal­ise the structure and prac­tice of the work­house. By 1776, a government survey was conduct­ed on work houses: in 1800, their total population was c90,000.

Rev John Becher a pioneer of workhouse and prison reform, and his assoc­iate George Nich­olls, created a system allowing parishes to pool their res­ources; thus they could operate housing for the poor on a local-regional le­v­el. Each work­house was a huge set of conn­ec­t­ed units, built as a residence for the poor. Becher's design was used as model by the Poor Law Commission to inform the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834, known as the New Poor Law. 

Southwell Workhouse, 
opened in 1824
Country Images Magazine

Women residents, 1896
Country Images Magazine

Becher was aiming for moral improvement. His philosophy was that work­houses should be a deterrent to an idle or profligate lifestyle; the harsh reality of work­house life was to encourage people to avoid this port of last call IF possible. His theory was that peop­le could find work if they really wanted to, and most indigent peop­le were just lazy. So by repetitive, hard work idle, indigents would be converted to a more upright life­style.

Inmates were divided into categories. Those too old or infirm to work were called Blameless and were treated with some compass­ion. Those who were capable of work, but were unemployed, were called Idle and Profligate Able-Bodied and were expected to work for their keep. Men had to break up rock for road building or pick apart rope, while women did laundry. Everyone wore unif­orms and life was intentionally kept monotonous.

They lived and worked in a strictly segregated environment with no cont­act between the old and infirmed, and the able-bodied. Men, women and children had separate quart­ers, so famil­ies were split up and not allowed to meet. The children rec­eiv­ed ba­s­ic education, and then were made to work. Rules were strict, un­d­er the tough eye of paid Masters or Matrons, and transgressions were harshly punished. 

The workhouse I know best was in Southwell Notts (1824), designed by South­well-Lincoln architect William Adams Nichol­son. The build­ing was the most complete workhouse in ex­istence, its archit­ect­ure influenced by prison design. This rur­al site was des­ig­ned to house 160 inmates, drawn from 62 surrounding parishes.

In 1929 a new Poor Law was intro­duced, and many of the old workhouses were converted into hos­pitals or social housing. The Workhouse provided temporary accom­m­odation for the homeless until 1976, when part of the site was converted into a residential old-age home. The institution continued until the early 1990s, when it was us­ed to provide temporary accommodation for mothers and children.
  
men's dormitory (above)

men eating lunch (below)
historyextra

 In 1997 the Nation­al Trust stepped in to buy Southwell’s Grade II listed building, to broaden its interests and to ensure its con­tin­ued ex­istence. Now a museum, Southwell is shown to school groups and families; the stories of 1840s inmates still prom­p­t reflection on how society tackled poverty before the modern welfare system.

Restoration began with roof repairs in 2000. Many rooms were redecorated to how they would have looked in the C19th; buildings, walls & privies, demolished in the C20th, were rein­st­ated. In 2015 the property was featured in the BBC One ser­ies 24 Hours in the Past, in which celeb­rities experienced life in Victorian Britain. Though from a distance it looked like a large factory, it began to look more prison-like, as the visitor passed through the entrance into the inner courtyards, very segreg­ated and isolated.

Around the inner courtyards were a series of small buildings hous­ing a laundry, drying room, water tank and an infirmary. One of the subsidiary buildings was the bakery, marked as a privy on the orig­inal plans for the site. It was only when the National Trust disc­ov­ered a mysterious key that the hidden bakery was visible. The tiny exercise yards, with a very simple outdoor privy in one corn­er, were overlooked by the warden's cham­b­ers so that the inmates were always watched, like criminals.

The Southwell Workhouse was in operation for 150+ years. Yet today, walking on the paupers' path to Southwell Workhouse, the site still shows how the Victorian poor must have felt as they sought ref­uge. The visitor comes away from The Workhouse appalled at the cond­­it­ions that the poor inmates were forced to endure. But the ques­tion remains: were conditions in the count­ryside much better?

Children at Crumpsall Workhouse Manchester,
c.1897, Flickr

Read Millie Thom for excellent images







23 comments:

roentare said...

Your research into these topics is really impressive. Your blog is becoming a reference site in many ways

The Workhouse, Southwell said...

Discover the most complete workhouse in existence. Find out about the Reverend Becher, the founder of The Workhouse and immerse yourself in the unique atmosphere of the building. Learn about the true stories of the 19th-century poor, brought to life by real archive evidence. Discover how society dealt with poverty through the centuries right up to the modern day. Explore the segregated work yards, day rooms, dormitories, master's quarters and cellars, then see the recreated working 19th-century garden and find out what food the paupers would have eaten.

The Workhouse, Upton Road, Southwell, United Kingdom, NG25 0PT
+44 1636 817260

hels said...

roentare

I am glad you find it interesting. I used to lecture far more often on 17th and 18th century history of Western and Central Europe, but then I found students actually preferred more modern history. Ditto bloggers, I imagine.

hels said...

The Workhouse

Thank you for the contact information. I hope people read up on the .aterial, before they do one of your excellent guided tours.

Joe said...

I assume we copied the British system exactly. The Destitute Asylum in Adelaide had two roles. To improve the inmates' moral character and to determine the idle from getting help. Orphans, the aged and the disabled were all treated badly.

Fun60 said...

What a thought provoking title. Without the workhouses many people would have died and yet they were run like prisons. Next time I am in Nottinghamshire I will visit Southwell.

Andrew said...

It seems that many of the workhouse 'inmates' would have otherwise died on the street. Workhouses were cruel and inhuman places perhaps but weren't orphanages and schools also such? Thanks for this post of a rather interesting history.

Hels said...

Joe

the Destitute Asylum was admirable in its first aim - to provide for needy people and to improve their moral character in a brand new society (Adelaide) where they probably didn't have any family around.

But to deter the idle from getting free food and accommodation seemed to dominate the authorities' thinking. Minimal food, unpleasant uniforms, poor hygiene, no contact outside the asylum, one nurse for hundreds of people at night etc... these seemed to become the priorities.

Hels said...

Fun60

It is well worth visiting Southwell, for a thoughtful historical analysis of the 19th and early 20th centuries. But I suspect we should be worrying about the future of involuntary institutionalisation as well, and not just in impoverished countries.

Hels said...

Andrew

of course any caring society had to provide services for the needy, if their families couldn't look after them, at least until pensions were provided by the state and universal health care became available. And we can even understand why the institutions tried to make their budgets go as far as possible, but eliminating all possible wastage.

But as you noted re orphanages and reform schools, nothing much has changed. As the abominable treatment and torture of children held in Don Dale Detention Centre Darwin showed, locking up 10-14 year olds involuntarily, without protection from the guards, is immoral. And the reports and footage from Perth’s Banksia Hill juvenile detention centre show equally destructive punishments on the boys.

Luiz Gomes said...

Boa noite minha querida amiga. Sua matéria nos mostra a realidade dos dias atuais. Obrigado pela visita e carinho.

mem said...

I am always appalled by the blame which is pointed at those of us in humanity who just haven't had the good fortune to be born with a good brain and the family background to be able to make the most of it . There is so much self righteous self admiration around . " I made it because I am a superior being " . There is often very little acknowledgement of just how random life is and that sometimes awful problems hit people who truly could be any one of us . This is epitomized in the Workhouse movement where families were broken up and inmates blamed for what life had thrown at them . I believe in personal responsibility but blaming a child for having learning difficulties or rotten parents is just awful . We , thank god have moved along a bit but as 4 corners showed we have a LOOOOONG way to go.

Hels said...

Luiz

agreed. There is limited knowledge about charitable services in the mid 19th century, but there is even less insight into institutional services in the modern era.

Hels said...

mem

and it wasn't that long ago :( My grandfather, the 5th of 7 children who became double orphans when he was 8, was put into a sewing machine factory to earn a living. The aunts and uncles gave the orphans a bed to sleep in, but they already had large families of their own.

People ended up in institutions for all sorts of reasons outside their own control, as you noted - blame was very often meaningless.

bazza said...

Some 60 years after the publication of Oliver Twist, Charlie Chaplin along with his mother and brother, spent some time in the Newington Workhouse in South London. I found this out a few years ago on a visit to the London Cinema Museum. Their building is adjacent to the original workhouse building which I believe is still standing.

bazza said...

Joe: I think the Australian model copied the British one in all of it's misguided aspects.

Hels said...

bazza

The Workhouse for St Mary Newington parish also started off well motivated to provide quality services for the poor, starting its career as a children’s home and school. But what happened to the children when the need for workhouse accommodation became urgent? This workhouse also took on the responsibility of deterring the lazy and not helping those who should have been able bodied.

Perhaps in London, poverty was even more unforgivable than in other places.

Hels said...

bazza

Destitute Asylum in Adelaide was indeed very much based on the British model, as were our monarchy, currency, language, government, sports, education systems and every other thing. However I had hoped that because South Australia had never accepted convicts, and because they really wanted to attract new citizens from home and abroad, charitable institutions in Adelaide would have been more sensitive and supportive.

Satya Shakti Foundation said...

I liked your post; it is so much informative and interesting. I'm going to bookmark your website for more new updates. Can you look at my website and give your suggestions.

Ishaq Ramzan said...

This is one of thes best site i found on google .Very Helpful article ..Thanks for sharing such a great post .
Tourist Distination of J&k MCQs

Hels said...

Satya and Ishaq

I agree :) But I wonder if talking about the history of workhouses in Britain informs us about charitable institutions in our own (ex-colonial) nations.

Hilary Melton-Butcher said...

Hi Hels - they most definitely weren't the best ... but society was adjusting ... and it's interesting to read and see society as it happened. St Pancras Workhouse was where my mother went for an interim period before we could transfer her down here to a Nursing Centre. Its history is very interesting and my mother loved hearing about how it developed. I've just given a talk on the Foundling Museum - another interesting period ... cheers Hilary

Hels said...

Hilary

it is a very small world :) I was also very interested in the Foundling Hospital, Lord
Rothermere, Thomas Coram Foundation, The Foundling Museum, art gallery, even Charles Dickens.

I suppose all charitable organisations faced the same moral questions, but children were even more vulnerable than adults in the workhouses.