28 September 2024

Ship University: learning, US power1926

As a graduate, James Lough had wanted to link exper­ien­ce with education. Later Lough became Prof of Experimental Psychology at NYU (1901-27), when he wanted to create a new kind of education that allowed students to learn on location. Lough took students to places like Grand Central Station and Wall St, to learn from experts.

 Students arrive on board  

This became the foundation of an experiment that he ran in 1913 to take students offshore; he ran the first study abroad programme in Am­erica that gave university credit for travel exper­ience. And it ran again in 1914. But not until 1923 were around-the-world cruises planned.

Students gathered on the ship deck for lecture
Semester At Sea

One of Lough’s most significant partners was Constantine Rais­es, a Greek student who as­s­isted with nec­essary ac­ademic and it­inerary preparations. Al­th­ough the programme was success­fully planned, en­rol­ments fell short and sailings were postponed. NYU dropped its programme sponsorship.

Shipping companies used to make money by bring­ing poor immigrants from Europe to US. But when the US intro­d­uced im­migration restrictions in 1921, that bu­siness model coll­ap­sed. Thus the shipping companies needed to find a new bus­iness quickly. They converted their  sto­r­age acc­omm­odation into Tourist Third Class and tried to fill it with stud­ents.

This made ship travel a perfect fit for Lough's passion for learning on-site. And a Float­ing University was the perfect fit for the shipping co­mpanies' new business model. It could be successful globally with stud­ents, ad­vertising a whole new, cheap third-class trav­el business.

Exercising and socialising around the ship's pool   
 
New York University/NYU had initially backed the ship venture but pulled out a few months prior to its departure. NYU real­ised that study­ing ab­road could be dangerous. Furthermore it threatened their academic model, i.e to con­t­rol the educ­at­ion the students would receive in the C20th. The universities wanted to determine “what was know­led­ge”, not the silly st­ud­ents on a ship travel­l­ing the world. Yet des­p­ite NYU with­drawing from the experiment, the ship university went ahead.

Because the prog­ram­me was no longer spons­ored by a single college, uni­versities were ea­ger to join and applications poured in. Thus Lough’s original vision eventually led to the suc­cessful maiden voyage of SS Ryndam in Sept 1926 when the grand educat­ional experiment started. It departed New York, to take 8 months. SS Ryndam was decor­ated with flags from stem to stern, thousands li­n­ing the Fifth St pier to see off their loved ones, the excited students coming from 143 colleges in 40 st­ates, as well as Canada, Cuba and Hawaii.

The ship had 504 stud­ents and 64 staff aboard, dock­ing in c50 ports. The University World Cruise, the brain­child of NYU Ps­ychology Pro­fessor James Lough, was in­tended to br­oaden stud­ents' learning, especial­ly in global aff­airs. Lough thought the voyage would help stud­ents bec­ome Citizens of the World, linking education with real experience.

As the ship sailed, Lough described the plan: This shall not be a mere sightseeing tour, but a college year of educ­at­ional travel and sys­tematic study to develop an interest in foreign affairs, to train stud­ents to think in world terms, and to stren­g­th­en internat­ional good will. The lectures covered business studies, history, politics, biology, economics and many other subjects.

During the 8 month voy­age, the ship covered 66,000 ks and visited 35 countries and 90+ cities, including Shang­hai, Hong Kong, Manila, Bang­kok, Colombo, Bombay, Haifa, Venice, Gib­r­altar, Lisbon and Oslo. They were host­ed by local univ­ersities who org­an­ised lectures and receptions, and went on excur­sions to important sites eg Taj Mahal in India, pyramids in Egypt and Acropolis in Greece.

University students visiting the Taj Mahal India 
ABC.

America emerged from WWI rich but it hadn't yet establ­ished the global dominance that it later claimed. What's remar­k­able about 1926 was that Amer­ic­an pow­er was still being created so students were exploring and learning from British imperialism. They're were thinking about how the American empire was growing in the Ph­ilippines and comparing it to a British emp­ire in India. They visited the Dutch East Indies and went to French Alger­ia, asking what would American world dominance look like?

The global venture allowed them to meet world leaders en route. In It­aly, they met notable figures such as Pope Pius XI, prime minis­ter Ben­ito Mussolini and in Thailand, King Pra­jad­hipok of Siam. The organis­ers had written to foreign gov­ern­­ments and asked for their cooperation, leading to the connec­tions. The stud­ents had Am­erican prosp­er­ity and post-war internation­al­ism on their side; the world that was presented to these students was one shaped by American power in the interwar era.

Criticism increased as the ship sailed. The voyage was deemed an ed­uc­at­­ional failure then, because students were enjoying them­selves instead of attending lectures. And it was deemed a failure by the media, partly be­cause of reports of students par­tying antics when docked in ports. The press spread stories of misbehaviour, alcoholism and pregnancies! But had the educational goals really failed?

Dr Tamson Pietsch at UTS's Australian Centre for Public His­tory says many students on the floating university voyage desc­ribed it as one of the great turning points of their lives. The trip was desig­n­ed to allow stud­ents to learn beyond the classroom and the exp­eriment was created with a diplomatic pur­pose in mind for America after WWI. It was also fash­ion­ing the elite that would go on to have great influence in USA. At their 1976 reunion, the students described the voyage as the greatest educational experience of their lives.

Conclusion 
Were there study courses run by NYU before 1926? Had there been other experiments in educational travel? In 1926 an American univ­ers­ity went to sea and many people said they caused an internat­ional scandal and an educational failure. Yet this is now a significant part of student life, with one in four Australian students going abr­oad. I, Helen, person­ally spent 12 months studying in Israel, and my son went on a shorter course in Canada and USA. Both experiences were full of learning.


Read Dr Tamson Pietsch, Floating University: Experience, Empire and Politics of Knowledge, 2023.





18 comments:

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

Never heard of James Lough or the university ship so found this really interesting a different way to learn and what an adventure it would have been for the students.

Ирина Полещенко said...

Hello, Helen! I think it's very interesting to be a student of a floating university.

A poor student said...

How much did it all cost, on ship and on land? Who paid?

Andrew said...

What's a little debauchery among students. I can imagine they turned out to be very well rounded people, wiser in many ways than their stay at home peers. It is interesting to note the number of women. Not so interesting is they all appear very white.

River said...

I think experience should always be linked wth education, book learning alone is just not good enough, in any field.

jabblog said...

It sounds like the poor man's version of the Grand Tour.

Hels said...

Jo-Anne
not just a different way to learn but different cities and countries to visit. Imagine the excitement for university students who were used to a very different life style.

Hels said...

Irina
a floating university is romantic, surrounded by gorgeous seascapes, parent-free, surrounded by friends day and night, and plenty of alcohol. As much as I loved University of Melbourne, I would have chosen a floating university any time.

Hels said...

Student
Tamson Pietsch said U.S $2,500 per person (= U.S $43,300 in 2023) was bound to limit the number of families who could consider the trip on financial grounds. Plus the students were spending huge amounts of money on foreign land, learning about international affairs.
My parents didn't have that sort of money when my siblings and I went on our gap year programmes, so they chose programmes where the students worked for free for our movements/schools after returning home

Hels said...

Andrew
I am not sure that their debauchery was so terrible with sex and booze; after all they were over 21 and didn't need their parents' consent. And I don't think students skipped lectures and tutorials, any more than they would have at their local university at home. Apparently the US newspapers encouraged the moral police at home to report or create panicky sex-filled stories.

Hels said...

River
How much more so was it for American students who wanted to know about the rest of the world. They had to examine foreign architecture, learn languages other than English, visit foreign diplomatic services, inspect other countries' cultural treasures etc.

Hels said...

jabblog
Perfect link :) The Grand Tour was my most favourite lecture series during all the years I was at the TAFE.

1.Only wealthy people could afford to go on the Uni Ship or on the Grand Tour 2.the tourists/students saw places that would never have been to otherwise, and
3.returnees found their lives improved career-wise.

Margaret D said...

Learn as you travel, what a good idea back then. Even today it's said that you learn more in travel, Hels. You see it was something different back in that day.

Hels said...

Margaret
Prof Lough agreed with you, specifically taking young Americans around the world by ship to make them better citizens of the world. He wanted to demonstrate a model for responsible and productive education, especially given the terrible dangers, new technologies and social upheavals of the post–WWI world.

I wonder if Australian, New Zealand and British students would have already been good citizens of the world post-WW1.

Joe said...

Did Prof Louis Lough have real imperial ambitions for his American students? This might have been surprising, given that the vicious WW1 was fought largely between colonial powers and should not have ever happened again. Additionally the USA had recently intro­d­uced im­migration restrictions in 1921.

Hels said...

Joe
Strange, isn’t it? Lough’s ambitious dream revealed an early C20th America more defined by its imperialism i.e taking over another country. His internationalist worldview must have been based on the already expanding nature of US power. Whereas for Australia, WW1 would have modified any such worldview.

Meeting Mussolini and Gandhi must have been arranged to give the students a knowledge of the greater world, being a demonstration of the U.S’s rapidly growing imperial power.

Katerinas Blog said...

First time I read about something like this.
It seems like a very good idea to me.
Surely these people got a real education.
But everything new, especially in those years, was difficult to accept!
Thanks so much for the info Helen!

Hels said...

Katerina
I wonder if young people in the post WW1 era and right through the 1920s were so 'modern' that they simply frightened their parents, politicians and social commentators.

The students thought they got a real education, both academic stuff and international affairs. I would say exactly the same thing on my Gap Year course abroad.