23 January 2024

Why was the Mona Lisa stolen in 1911?

Many years ago I examined the theft of the Mona Lisa in this blog. So now let us re-examine the most famous painting in the universe, by Leonardo da Vinci in 1503-16, to reveal a different motive from the one provided back in 2012.

Vincenzo Peruggia (above) stole his beloved Mona Lisa (below)
from the Louvre in 1911.


King Francois I placed his Mona Lisa treasure in the Louvre where it safely rested and enthralled crowds for centuries. Leonardo da Vin­ci would have been delighted. But it changed in Aug 1911. It was a quiet Sunday in Paris’ most famous museum when a short man with a moustache entered the Louvre and tiptoed to the salon where the Mona Lisa was housed. Then he hid in a broom cupboard.

In the morning, before the museum opened to the public, the man crept out, clad in the white apron uniform of Louvre emp­l­oyees. He grabbed the C16th oil paint­­ing from its location on the wall, carried it to a serv­ice stair­s, re­moved the paint­ing from its glass frame and wrap­ped it in a white sheet. Before he was able to re­m­ove the locked stair-door and escape, he was met by a pl­umber also using the stairs. With uncanny luck, the work­man assumed the brazen burglar was a fel­l­ow em­ployee who needed help. The imposter thanked the employee and exited, with the hidden painting.

Guards noticed that the painting was missing but assumed it was moved by staff. But the day after, when French artist Louis Béroud visited the museum to sketch his Mona Lisa au Louvre, he found only 4 iron pegs where the painting had hung. The Louvre was secure­ly shut down!! To inves­t­­igate the loss, detectives dusted for prints and rig­orously questioned museum staff (all cleared). The only clue was the painting’s glass frame, discarded in the stairwell!

Checkpoints were set up to search pedestrians and cars, the French bord­er was sealed and departing ships and trains sear­ched. By the time the museum re-opened 9 days later, the theft was front-page news inter­nat­ionally. When the museum ev­ent­ually reopened, thousands pour­ed in the doors to gaze on the empty wall space. The investigat­ion found 2 high-profile suspects. They arrested Guillaume Apollinaire in Sept, after linking the French poet to the earlier theft of two statuettes which his secretary stole from the Louvre. During the interrogation, Apollinaire linked another high-profile suspect to the case: Pablo Picasso, who had purchased the stolen statues in order to use them as models for his work. Police questioned both about the Mona Lisa theft, but they were cleared.

2 years later, Florentine art dealer Alfredo Geri received a let­t­er in the mail. Postmarked from Paris, the sender was someone who signed the letter as Leonard. The writer claimed he was responsible for the theft of the Mona Lisa, and that he wished to see the masterpiece back on Italian soil. Geri contacted Giovanni Poggi, Director of Uf­fizi Gallery. The pair doubted the letter’s reliability, but thought they should proc­eed with the of­fer presented in the letter. Geri in­vited the man to Florence, and the three soon met in the writ­er’s ho­tel room. An object wrapped in red silk was produced, and resp­ect­ful­ly placed upon the bed. The Florent­ines starred in dis­belief: it was the Mona Lisa!

The painting was taken to Uffizi, and the man’s asking pr­ice of 500,000 lire was agreed to. But Geri & Poggi never meant to pay the ransom for da Vinci’s Mona Lisa. Instead the painting was au­th­enticated and the police called.

11th Dec 1913, the Italian immigrant Leonard was arrested at his Fl­or­entine hotel room. Vincenzo Peruggia was a former Louvre employee who had actually built Mona Lisa’s glass case. Peruggia knew the mus­eum practices, mak­ing him the perfect candidate for his art heist. [But how did no record at the Louvre include his name?]

Now here is the surprising bit. Peruggia was hailed as a national hero by the Italian people. In my first post I had said that Peruggia bel­ieved that the Mona Lisa had been stolen from Florence by Napol­eon. Thus the thief was only do­ing his patriotic duty, by returning the painting to its true home in Italy. But we need to remember that Mona Lisa had never been part of Napoleon’s art collection.

Rather Benjamin Evemy showed that Peruggia had kept the Mona Lisa in his flat in out­er Paris, hidden in the fal­se bottom of a wooden steam­er trunk. As Mona Lisa’s keep­er, Perug­gia said he fell in love with her smile and feasted his eyes on his trea­s­ure every night. It was a sexual and nationalist love, with nothing at all to do with Napoleon.

Many Italians really did joyously welcome Leonardo da Vinci’s mas­ter­piece back home to the Uffizi and the Borghese Galleries, Villa Med­ici, Farnese Palace and the Brera Museum. It was a triumphal tour of Italy, so clearly many Italians agreed with Peruggia.

Peruggia received to 13 months in prison, but ended up serving only 7 months. Due to the excellent relations between Italy and France, Pog­gi was allowed to exhibit the painting in the Uffizi until Jan 1914, along with two other masterpieces of the artist from da Vinci: The Annunciation and Adoration of the Magi. Then the Mona Lisa re­turned to the Louvre, and in the first days following its re-installation, c120,000 thankful Frenchmen visited the mus­eum. 

The Louvre welcomed the star painting home, Paris 1914 
New York Times

The sensation caused by the theft greatly helped to boost this paint­ing’s public reputation and to cement its place in the col­lective con­sc­ious­ness of Italian and French art lovers and others.

Read The Art Inquirer, August 2011 and Great Art Heists of History, in Mutual Art, June 2021.




28 comments:

Fun60 said...

My granddaughter loved this story which I had read to her before visiting the Louvre a couple of years ago. I doubt the Mona Lisa would be the most famous painting in the world without the publicity of its theft.

roentare said...

The whole story is so good to read. Always wiser after your post update.

Hels said...

Fun60

It was great that you took your grandchild to the Louvre and it is even better to involve her in the collection. Before I took my grandchildren to the National Gallery of Victoria Last time, I asked them to remember which work of art they liked the most and why? Assuming they would forget this task totally, we all went to the Gallery's coffee shop and I was delighted to hear their choices, and why.

Hels said...

roentare

I know security in 1911 was not as amazing as it is today, but Mona Lisa must have been the most famous work of art from any country, from any decade. How did the police not find out that Vincenzo Peruggia had worked at the Louvre, just by looking at the gallery's records? The thief MUST have been familiar with the mus­eum practices!

jabblog said...

What an extraordinary story and how fortunate that the painting was undamaged.

hels said...

jabblog

Agreed. Can you imagine the Mona Lisa cut into small squares and thrown in a rubbish bin?

Fortunately Peruggia wanted to protect the masterwork for his own nation and, although he was just as much a criminal, he would never have knowingly damaged the work.

I have seen activists cover art works with great splashes of paint because they didn't like the nationality-religion-politics of the artist or the contents of the work offended them.

DUTA said...

Last month, I had the opportunity to view some perfect copies of famous paintings, among them the Mona Lisa. The paintings, placed in the entrance hall of a major hospital were donated by a french-israeli billionaire by the name of Plateau Sharon before his death.
Contemplating these paintings, I asked myself why should anyone go to such trouble as to steal the originals, when there are such perfect copies to delight us.

Mandy said...

No idea how, but I did not know the Mona Lisa had been stolen. How lucky that the thief couldn't help himself from reaching out about it

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, It is remarkable how easily and improbably so many art masterpieces have been stolen or attacked. As you noted, many of these thefts have had political motivations, and today's tremendous art prices provide an additional incentive for greater notoriety as well as enhanced remuneration (black market sales, ransom, or satisfaction in possession). An extra problem is that museums could not display so many artworks while providing maximum protection, although for iconic pieces museums should always be extra vigilant.
--Jim

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

I have seen photos of the Mona Lisa and it is a nice painting but I really don't see what all the fuss is about

Joe said...

The sex appeal must have run out and the need for money took over. Did the thief know how much the painting was actually valued at?

Andrew said...

It is curious that the culprit's name wasn't listed as a employee. Out sourcing labour back then? Two years is a long time for the painting to be missing. Still, it wasn't the first investigation bungled by police and certain not the last either.

My name is Erika. said...

I knew the Mona Lisa had been stolen, but I didn't know the story behind it nor how it was repatriated. I really enjoyed reading this Hels. Thanks for sharing this story. There are still the stolen paintings from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston to find, and probably a lot of other pieces too (especially from WW2).

Hels said...

DUTA

I agree with you 100%, as long as there is no trickery involved. After all, we get our pleasure from visiting the original art perhaps once in our life times, and the rest of the time we depend on photos, on line copies of the originals or in books/magazines.

Hels said...

Mandy

it seems that the story of the Mona Lisa theft was not as publicised as it might have been at the time, given the embarrassment in both galleries and the inadequate police involvement. And I have rarely seen the theft mentioned in the last 30 years. How strange.

Hels said...

Parnassus

I almost understand why thieves would steal a treasure, if they thought they could make a truckload of money out of it. This would especially be true for diamonds or gold, difficult to identify even if the treasures were found. But stealing the most identifiable portrait in the universe and "hiding" it in a trunk in a Paris flat must have indicated Peruggia's very very limited mind.

The security question is still mind blowing :(

Hels said...

Jo-Anne

Probably if you asked a million people on every continent to name a famous painting, 95% of them would name the Mona Lisa. Whatever we moderns think about this painting, Leonardo da Vinci created the most symbolic work representing the entire Renaissance era.

CherryPie said...

I agree with Jo-Anne's Ramblings.

Having seen the painting I really don't know what all the fuss is about. If it hadn't been for the crowd of people in front of it I probably wouldn't have noticed it!

Hank Phillips said...

Thanks so much for the interesting story.

Hels said...

Joe

Peruggia's asking pr­ice of 500,000 lire was agreed to in 1913, but he might have been so naive (or hungry) that he didn't understand what he was asking for.

While the value of the Mona Lisa is immeasurable, since it has long been seen as priceless, the Mona Lisa price might be guessed at $860 million today. But which insurance company would be willing to pay out that sort of money?

Hels said...

CherryPie

The Mona Lisa painting has had a profound influence on not only art history from the Renaissance and onwards, as I mentioned to Jo-Anne. But think of all the painters, sculptors, writers, musicians and academics who have drawn inspiration from this work of art in the 500+ years since.

Hels said...

Andrew
did the gallery not know the unique importance or the financial value of their painting in 1911?
And even later, ARTnews recorded:
1956: A rock was thrown at Leonardo’s masterpiece by a Bolivian man
1974: While on tour in Tokyo, a political activist brought spray paint to cover the portrait. Fortunately the guards caught her.
2009: La Gioconda is hit with a teacup by a Russian woman who had been denied French citizenship.

Hels said...

Hank

You might like to read "The Day They Stole the Mona Lisa", 1981, by Seymour Reit.
Then read the Washington Post's review of Reit's book
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/entertainment/books/1981/10/11/how-to-steal-a-masterpiece-and-other-art-crimes/ef25171f-88a4-44ea-8872-d78247b324e7/

Hels said...

Erika

Many such stories, yes. Read "Museum of Lost Art", an excellent book by Noah Charney (2018)
https://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2019/05/a-great-new-art-book-museum-of-lost-art.html

I have been following the stolen paintings from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston since 1990. How those important Rembrandts, Vermeers, Degas and Manets disappeared was horrible, but that no arrests have been made since and no works have ever been recovered is beyond unbelievable.

Hilary Melton-Butcher said...

Hi Hels - I hadn't realised the story ... it probably happened when my Mum was ill and my mind didn't focus on much else - except perfunctorily. Interesting to read about it - cheers Hilary

Hels said...

Hilary

I did a degree in history and art history, but I also don't remember the Mona Lisa story ever being mentioned. But then I don't remember ANY academic lectures or journal articles about naughtiness in the art world - thefts, faked works, restitution of works taken in war, lost art and looted antiquities.

Sorry to hear about your mum's illness.... too terrible to contemplate. My parents passed in 2016, and I still have disturbed blood pressure and anxiety :(

ARTnews said...

Earlier this week at the Louvre in Paris, two protesters threw soup at the Mona Lisa. The orange concoction was splashed across the bulletproof glass protecting the famous painting. The artwork suffered no damage.

After throwing soup, the two female protesters broke through the protective barrier and stood alongside the piece with hands raised in salute. “What is more important? Art or the right to have a healthy and sustainable food system?” the activists asked in French.

Louvre security guards subsequently hauled them away. It remains unclear how the protesters made it through the museum’s security system with the soup.

Hels said...

After all the thefts and vandalism, I have only one question. How did the protesters get through the museum's security system without being detected?