20 May 2025

Ruth Ellis UK 1955 - hanging is immoral

I will never forget the letters, petitions and public protests ag­ainst the last execution carried out in Australia. Ronald Ryan (1925–1967) was found guilty of killing a warder during a pris­­on outbreak in 1965. His 1967 hanging horrified Australian citizens and led to permanent legislative change across the nation.

David Blakely and Ruth Ellis 
at the Little Club London, in 1955

Australia should have learned earlier. Ruth Ellis (1926–1955) was hanged for her lover's murder, the last woman to be executed in Britain. Welsh-born Ellis had been a beautiful nude and lin­g­erie model with a great figure, a nightclub hostess in a plush London club. The blond 29 year old mother of 2 young children, she said she'd been in a relation­ship with a 25-year-old upper-class racing driver David Blakely.

There was a ton of evidence that Blakely had been violent towards her including 3 miscarriages from beatings on the stomach, hospital records of bruised and broken body parts. Today the medical evid­ence would have cancelled the mur­der charge in favour of a man­slaughter charge, or actual bodily harm in self defence.

Hampstead, where he'd been hiding out in friends’ homes, was not far from the Magdala pub where the shoot­ing was. Ellis was definitely the person who fired the shots at Blakely but had she been driven there and given the loaded gun by her other lover, Desmond Cussen? In any case, the trial las­t­­ed just a day. A unanimous, swift (23 mins) guilty ver­dict saw the trial judge immediately don his black cap to pass the death sentence.

Ellis was portrayed as calm and expressionless between the mur­der, in mid April 1955, and the very speedy execution in Hol­lo­way Prison 3 months later. But the main question remains: how much did class and sexist prejudices play in the decision not to bar or can­cel Ruth Ellis’ hanging?
                                    
Crowds gather at Holloway Prison London
before the execution of Ruth Ellis, 1955
Flicker

There has long been a fascination in Britain with young women acc­used of murder eg
1. Edith Thompson & Fred­erick Bywaters were a British couple executed for the murder of Thompson's husband Percy in 1923.
2. Young songwriter Alma Rattenbury was accused along with her younger lover of killing her husband, in 1935. The trial judge told the jury NOT to convict her just because she was an adulteress. Only her lover was hanged, so Rabbenbury stabbed herself to death.
3. Margaret Allen, hanged in Man­chester in 1949, was a gay woman who killed her elderly, brut­alising neighbour.
4. In 1953 Louisa Merrifield was hanged for pois­oning her employer, in response to the boss’s newly changed will.

Murders by women were sensationalised in the English press. While male villainy was dismissed as an unfortunate regres­sion, the same sort of behaviour in females, particularly when it was direct­ed at males, was condemned as a hideous perversion. Men were punished; women were punished and villified. The Victorians were originally fasc­inated by the transgressive woman, but so were 1950s newspapers! Ruth Ellis could not have breached more sexual stand­ards of 1955, had she tried – nude modelling, adultery with Blakely, working in a night club, drinking alcohol herself and receiving money from Cussen.

Front page, Daily Mirror, July 1955 Two Royal Commissions have protested against these horrible events. Now it is time for ordinary citizens to add their voices.

BBC Four gave 3 hours to a re-examination by the American film-maker Gillian Pachter in March 2018. The tv series The Ruth Ellis Files looked at new evid­ence of Cussen’s role and also the part that a journalist played posthum­ously. The chief crime reporter for The People took up Ellis’ case and inter­viewed her young son, Andy – something the police had never done. In early 1956, the report­er noted: “Ruth Ellis would not have hanged … but for a tragic er­ror of judgment by the home secretary.” The home secretary had not given Scotland Yard enough time to investigate how Cussen had prim­ed and encouraged her to kill.

Months later, the Home Office conceded that there might be some­thing in Webb’s claims. Director of Public Prosecutions concluded that: “Since Ellis is no longer available as a witness, there is no ev­id­ence to prove that Cussen supplied her with the gun.” Good grief!! Cussen secretly emigrated to Aust­ral­ia and died 1991.

In 2003, Ellis’ sister Muriel Jakubait requested a post­hum­ous appeal. Muriel revealed that their father had raped her at 14, producing a son who was brought up as her brother, and had also abused Ellis. The abuse and the beatings by Ruth’s husband, George Ellis, and boyfriend David Blakely, formed the other part of her case for the appeal court. However the appeal court concluded that Ruth Ellis had been rightly convicted of murder under the law back then.

Her execution played an important role in eliminating capital pun­ishment across the UK. So Gillian Pachter had to ask if that 1955 case still had any particular relevance today. Yes! Firstly, Pachter said, there hasn’t been a case that changed the conscience of the USA in quite the same way as Ellis’ did. Secondly the way that Ellis’ own violence and male sexual violence against her was framed by the auth­or­ities …still resonates today.

Endless protest marches against capital punishment in Melbourne,
Herald Sun, 1967

Ruth's ex-husband, George Ellis, committed suicide in 1958. Her son Andy suicided in 1982, aged 38. Her daughter Georgie died in 2017 of cancer, aged only 50, still hoping that her mother would be cleared. Capital punishment was always immoral, and not just for the executed person.




28 comments:

roentare said...

Ruth Ellis’s execution exposed deep flaws in justice shaped by gender and class bias. Her case helped end capital punishment in the UK and still resonates as a warning about how abused women are treated by the system.

Your legal friend said...

Colin Ross was hanged in Melbourne in 1922 for the murder of a young girl in the Gun Alley Murder (1921). The case was re-opened in the 1990s using modern forensic techniques where the results confirmed Ross's innocence. The Governor of Victoria sent a complete pardon for Ross to his grandchildren, but it was a bit late.

jabblog said...

Fear of a flawed court decision is one of the major arguments against capital punishment. Is incarceration for life always preferable? Taking another person's life is never acceptable. I admit that I sit on the fence on this question. I could never be completely certain of another's guilt.

Hels said...

roentare
I would argue that capital punishment is always disgusting, but even more so when the so-called murderer was not there at all, or was there but only as moral support to the real murderer. What if the so-called murderer is not capable of making competent decisions?

ITV showed that Ruth and her sister's upbringing was filled with terror ... from sexual abuse from their daddy Arthur, beginning when Arthur’s twin brother Charles was killed in a 1920s bicycle accident. Why did her terror-filled childhood not get brought up in court?

Hels said...

Hi friend :)
I have no doubt that Colin Ross did illegal things (re guns and alcohol), given that he had to work full time as a labourer from the age of 11 and was punished in court for his "crimes". But the little girl raped and killed was not a merely illegal thing. Alas in 1921 there was no forensic evidence and the only witnesses were a prostitute and a fortune teller.

Only in 2006 did the Supreme Court reconsider the matter and found unanimously that the case did represent a miscarriage of justice. It certainly did :(

Hels said...

jabblog
Even if we were TOTALLY certain of another's guilt, I would still argue that execution is never the answer. Incarceration for life is the proper solution, and if the so-called murderer's guilt is later proven incorrect, then release from prison should be asap.

Margaret D said...

Such tragedy she endured, so sad. When the press get hold of a story like this they never seem to let go, but then people well some of them want to know.
Hanging is final and with today's technology it's just awful when it's found out that a person is innocent which seems to happen too often. It's pleasing hanging is not permitted these days.

Hels said...

Margaret
In the days before tv (Nov 1956), most of the cases I have read about commented on the relentless coverage newspapers gave to murder cases. I am assuming the newspapers had no vested interested in who did the murders and who was innocent, but I am certain the papers really did love the drama .. and sales.

What surprises me, however, is that newspapers could write anything about a case, even while their material could easily influence jury members.

Linda's Relaxing Lair said...

I echo Margaret's comment.

hels said...

Linda and Margaret,
Hanging is just one method of capital punishment. I don't know if a firing squad or guillotine or electric chair would be any less immoral.

Andrew said...

I don't believe humans have a right to take another life, perhaps outside war. If Patterson, mushroom lady is convicted of murder of three people, I expect in days past she would be hanged. I think the interest in the case would have received just as much coverage if it was a man before the courts.

The Guardian said...

There has long been a fascination in Britain with young women accused of murder. When Madeleine Smith was charged with the poisoning of her French lover in 1857, the case received more press coverage throughout Britain than the Indian Mutiny with which it coincided. This trial will always rank among the causes celebres of the world, the Observer wrote.

While male villainy was dismissed as an unfortunate regression, the same sort of behaviour in females, particularly when it was directed at males, was condemned as a hideous perversion. To the Victorian audience, the murderess represented passion unleashed. She had spurned constraints imposed on civilised society, had given in to animal impulses.

Duncan Campbell, Guardian, Tue 13 Mar 2018

Hels said...

Andrew
I too expect that in previous eras, the Patterson mushroom lady would have been convicted of multi murders and attempted murders, and hanged quickly.
But young hoodlums and drug dealers kill all the time, and they are on the news only when the final decisions are made by the courts and then the appeals. Patterson is middle aged, female, a mother, rural, a good cook and seemingly stable (til now) ... and she is on the news every.. single...day!

hels said...

Duncan
That makes me worry about the world changing very slowly. Seeing male villainy as an unfortunate regression while the same behaviour in females as a hideous perversion may still have repercussions, long after the Victorian era ended.

mem said...

Its still happening n. The Lindy Chamberlain case and now the current mushroom situation are warnings to hasten to judgement slowly and to be aware of our prejudices . Women are always held up to a higher standard . and when they "fall" are characterized as more terrible.

diane b said...

Capital punishment should have been thrown out of the justice system years ago, before all of these cases. Today with more transparency we see how prolific family violence is rife in our country. Men are mostly the perpertrators. When women retaliate it is big news. Just the same on the sporting fields. Rugby league players who misbehave off the field only get a slap on the wrist but when Sam Kerr misbehaved off the field it was international news and a court case not so with the naughty boys.

River said...

I didn't read all of this, but do agree hanging is an awful punishment, a horrible way to die. I'm glad it is now illegal.

My name is Erika. said...

I feel bad for Ruth Ellis. It sounds like she had a tough life, and then to be hung because the death could have been self defense. Wow. The double standard for women is often hard to read about. And so many people want to bring back capital punishment, at least here in the US. I'm not sure the eye for an eye look at it is always the best thing.

Hels said...

mem
that is so true. Even though there has been no capital punishment in this country since 1967, women still tend to be held to a higher standard in the news services and perhaps in the courts.
And another thing. Sometimes a life sentence in gaol is not an appropriate verdict, even if the murder was certain. A person who was psychotic, drugged up to the eyeballs or a brain damaged alcoholic needs a much more medically suitable residence for life than a concrete cell with a small window with strong metal bars.

Hels said...

diane
The Death Penalty Information Centre reported that in 1846, Michigan became the first U.S state to abolish the death penalty, then Rhode Island and Wisconsin. By 1900, the world saw Venezuela, Portugal, Netherlands, Costa Rica, Brazil and Ecuador follow suit. So Australia could hardly say it was prevented from banning hanging before 1967 because noone else had.

Hels said...

River
Disgusting, yes. But even if the method of execution reduced the pain to the criminal to be killed (eg by drugging him first), it would still make murderers of the police, judges and the especially the hangmen.
I hope it never becomes legal again, even if 90% of the executed criminals really DID do the murders.

Hels said...

Erika
Understood totally. The US has a real problem because 27 of the states have legal capital punishment, at least for some crimes. So that people in the non-executing states can easily say "We must bring it back here, to protect our decent citizens like Texas and Oklahoma do".

China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the US account for a good proportion of legal executions in the world, so I cannot imagine new laws being passed in those five countries, banning capital punishment.

Pradeep Nair said...

There is a lot of gender stereotyping on crime. Capital punishment has always been debated. Many nations have banned it. In India, it's there. It's though awarded only for the "rarest of the rare cases". The next severe sentencing here is "imprisoned for the rest of the life".

Hels said...

Pradeep Nair
I find legal capital punishment "for the rarest of rare cases" difficult to pin down in India. The Constitution might be talking about criminal conspiracy, murder, waging war against the Government and mutiny, but it leaves judges thinking they can make the final judgements.
University of Oxford reported that since the turn of this century, India has executed eight people, despite imposing 3000+ death sentences in this time frame! Noone can be sure of how the future will pan out.

Handmade in Israel said...

Such a sad life and thus it continued with the next generation.

Hels said...

Handmade
Only 55 countries in the world have capital punishment in their laws, while thankfully 133 do not. And even these 55 countries don't use it very often.

But the immorality doesn't just continue to the next generation... it also spreads sideways. Amnesty International record­ed 1,153+ exe­cu­tions took place in _only 16 coun­tries_ in 2023, and the number is going up each year. Furthermore some countries maintain execution numbers in secret eg China, Afghanistan, Iran. So 1,153 is definitely an underestimation.

Mandy said...

And yet polls in the UK continue to ask us if the death penalty should be brought back. I find the tenacity itself to be leading and an attempt to influence hearts and minds.

A very interesting post, Hels. Apologies for the late comment but it caught my eye

Hels said...

Mandy
I always find capital punishment to be disgusting, if the police, judge and jury made a mistake about the prisoner's guilt. Even if they later apologise to the grieving parents, widows and orphans, the prisoner will still be dead.

But it is almost as disgusting if the prisoner was indeed guilty. Killing is killing, whether the execution is done by a vicious criminal or by the state's representative. So why would the UK even _think_ about joining the brutal countries that kill citizens: China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, USA, Iraq etc.