29 August 2026

State killings: Saudi Arabia, USA & Victoria


Saudi authorities beheaded a Pakistani in Feb 2014 for smuggling drugs.
Photo credit: Newsweek.

This article was written by the journalist Phillip Adams and published in The Weekend Australian (27-28 Sep 2014).  What has changed since?

When it comes to beheadings, ISIS are rank amateurs. In the past year the despotic Saudi Arabian regime has decapitated dozens. Enjoying favoured status as a US ally and provider of the good oil, this brutality has aroused no criticism. In Saudi, you can get the chop for everything from adultery to sorcery and minor drug dealing. We are talking public executions. Beheadings are a popular entertainment.

In 1995, Middle East correspondent Robert Fisk reported how 12 women of various South East Asian ethnicities had been executed after callous trials, including a mother and daughter who were beheaded in front of a male audience for murdering the woman’s abusive husband. Last year it was reported that more than 45 foreign maids were on death row in Saudi Arabia. The response from the West and its diplomats? As ever, deafening silence.

Phillip Adams became concerned by Saudi justice in 1980 when seeing the British film Death of a Princess screened, over Saudi protests and the regime’s threats of economic sanctions. A young member of their royal family and her lover had been executed for adultery. His praise for the doco-drama resulted in his first-ever death threat. No sooner had the broadcast began than the tv station received a bomb threat; the discussion continued on tv with the bomb squad and their dogs searching around.

But let’s not be eager to take the high ground. The huge death toll suffered in Iraq as a result of the Bush-Blair-Howard invasion, for example. But at least Australia (1973) and UK (1965) abandoned the death sentence. Not so the US where Texas leads the charge, having killed 600 people by lethal injection since 1982. Meanwhile 31 other US states continue to carry the death penalty, as leaders follow the example of former Texas governor George W Bush in demonstrating their Saudi-style manliness.

execution chamber Georgia Diagnostic Prison, Jackson. 2020
NBC News

Those executions are as political and cruel as the ISIS. And they serve as public entertainments for ultra conservative voters, in the proud tradition of American lynchings. And so often the chemical cocktail fails to do its job, leading to a death that is agonisingly slow. The US government is keen to talk up the savagery of the ISIS beheadings, but while many U.S states employ the death penalty so often, so arbitrarily and so clumsily, and in light of the torture of prisoners in Guantanamo and in secret rendition locations, the High Moral Ground seems totally inappropriate.

I agree with everything Adams said, except for the arbitrary nature of capital punishment in Saudi Arabia and in those American states that execute criminals. Saudi Arabia uses executions specifically to get rid of its problematic populat-ions: single women, married women who talk to men-not-their-husbands, foreign women, people who use guns to kill and drug dealers. Texas (to use Adams’ example) uses executions specifically to get rid of its problematic populations too: young black men, older black men, people who use guns to kill and drug dealers.

And one more statistic to make sense of. The 3 main countries that sent troops to invade Iraq in March 2003 were, as Adams noted, the USA, Britain and Australia. In the 3 weeks taken to complete the air strikes, 7,500 Iraqi civilians were killed by us Westerners, according to The Guardian. The 345 civilian executions in Saudi Arabia, carried out from 2007-10 by public beheading, seem puny in comparison.

Tens of thousands of people protested against the imminent execution of Ronald Ryan
Melbourne, 1967
Photo credit: Herald Sun newspaper

I recommend Dick Hamer: The Liberal Liberal written by Tim Colebatch and published by Penguin Books in 2014. Rupert Dick Hamer (1916-2004) was Premier of Victoria in the critical years from 1972 to 1981. This sympathetic biography was drawn from members of the Hamer family who shared with the author their stories, documents and photos. Colebatch also included details from personal and political diaries that Hamer wrote when he was a very young politician (1939-41). Since I am a paid up member of the Labour Party, it was incredible for me to have admired a conservative. But under this leader of the conservative party, abortion and homosexuality were decriminalised, anti-discrimination laws were introduced and protection of the environment emerged for the first time in legislation. What was there not to love?

Of all of Hamer's achievements listed in the book, focus on Hamer's strength on the abolition of capital punishment. Although opinion polls indicated that some Victorians still supported capital punishment, at least for particularly heinous crimes, Hamer allowed state MPs a free vote; he successfully legislated to abolish capital punishment in Victoria in 1975. This had been a risky move - in 1967 his predecessor Premier Henry Bolte had brutally ordered the execution of the last man in Australia to face the hang man. Ronald Ryan's execution devastated the state; remember the protest marches that brought the City to a standstill.

Was Victoria a leader of  Australian states in abolishing capital punishment? Hardly. Only W Australia (1984) and New South Wales (1985) were slower bringing in their legislation.





11 comments:

Andrew said...

I don't believe anyone has the right to take another's life.
Wasn't it during the Iraq war when the phrase "collateral damage" was first used to refer to civilians who were killed, making the them less human victims of war.

Amnesty International said...

Amnesty International recorded 2,707 executions in 2025 in 17 countries, an increase of 78% from the 1,518 known executions in 2024. It is the highest figure recorded by Amnesty International since 1981 when it recorded 3,191 executions (excluding China). The highest number of executions were in China (1000s), Iran (2,159+), Saudi Arabia (356+), Yemen (51+), USA (47).

Fun60 said...

I agree with Andrew that we have no right to take the life of another. I am sure so much goes on behind closed doors that we are unaware of the number of lives taken even by so called civilised countries.

roentare said...

Although much has changed since Adams wrote this article in 2014, the fundamental issue he raised remains relevant: despite the decline of ISIS and significant changes in the geopolitical landscape, Saudi Arabia continues to impose the death penalty, the United States retains capital punishment in several states, while Australia remains firmly opposed to its use.

River said...

Note to self: Never, ever, leave Australia.

hels said...

Ahh River
110+ countries have _totally_ banned capital punishment and another 50+ countries have banned it except for the most unlikely possibilities. So stay here.. except perhaps for New Zealand, Netherlands, etc :)

hels said...

Amnesty International,
Many thanks for your records which I trot out any time I need evidence. But how confident are you about each nation's reliability in data presentation? You acknowledge that with China's uncertain data already but other nations may not publicise judges' rulings or executioners' actions.

hels said...

Andrew
Deaths in war, of people in the armed forces or collateral damage to civilians, are almost understandable. The war deaths are no-named enemies for whom we have conscripted and trained every adult male in this country to kill. These killings are still immoral, but they are not the same as ordering the public death of a publicised rapist or drug dealer.
(Sorry about my English. I need some sleep)

hels said...

Fun60
I agree with you. Some countries have killing programmes that remind us of the Medieval Witch Trials. But medieval authorities were proud of
their witch trials, loudly using the hangings to teach women what would happen to them if they misbehaved.

hels said...

roentare
Firmly opposed, thank goodness. But if an extreme right wing party ever takes over the Federal Government here, could we ever be returned to the pre-1970s?

Margaret D said...

Saudi Arabia, what a dreadful place it must be to live, living in fear of doing something wrong, then killed and how many people were innocent. I do wonder how the Judges, King and family who deem these people to be killed sleep at night. I think it's barbaric even if they are not innocent. No one should in my opinion take anyone's life anywhere - exception is war, losing life in a war is very different, Hels. Well in my opinion.