gold and enamel table salt cellar.
made for Francis I of France, 1543Cover image on Cellini's Autobiography
Benvenuto Cellini (1500-71) was a famous Florentine goldsmith and sculptor, a passionate craftsman who was admired and resented by the most powerful C16th politicos and artists. His father had wanted Benvenuto to follow in him as a musician working at the Florentine Medici court. Despite playing well, the young man chose goldsmithing, working in other cities before joining the prestigious Florentine goldsmiths’ guild.
This goldsmith, sculptor, poet, soldier and musician was also a murderer, priest, communicator with the dead and sodomiser who knew all about papal persecution and prisons, AND the royal court's adulation. In Autobiography (1558-63), kings, cardinals and artists all appeared.
Once a famous Italian Renaissance artist, and now a neglected figure compared to his predecessors Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo, Cellini’s story provided a unique perspective on the era. In 1558, as commissions dried up, Cellini began dictating My Life to an assistant, a scandalous account of C16th art and society.
His surviving art and writings revealed less an idyllic Golden Age, and more an era of political and religious turbulence. Largely based on life in Cellini’s native Florence & his career working elsewhere, his autobiography had both fact and fiction. Rely on Jerry Brotton and Martin Chorzempa.
The C15th Italian peninsula was a series of small republics ruled by powerful families. These powerful figures gave rise to great art, once they commissioned artists in the city states. But the Italian Wars, starting with the French Invasion, was changing the political balance of these feuding cities, bringing French and Spanish empires in.
bronze sculpture,1545–54.
in the Loggia dei Lanzi, FlorenceBack in Florence, Cellini saw the Florentines took advantage of the turmoil in Rome to banish the Medicis and proclaim a republic. Worse, a plague had ravaged the city such that the beautiful streets once bursting with noble citizens were now filthy and stinking. The fear of plague led artists to move across Italy, obtaining patronage where they could.
Cellini fled to Rome and established his own goldsmith’s business there. He exploited his Medici ties to win Giulio de’ Medici’s patronage, who was appointed Pope Clement VII in 1523. But the wider geopolitics surrounding the Italian peninsula quickly submerged him. In 1527 Holy Roman Emperor Charles V’s imperial army invaded Rome, leading to an orgy of looting, violence and killing c25,000 civilians. Cellini was ordered by the Pope to hide the papal jewels, before the Pope fled the city.
The plague saw Cellini working in Mantua, Venice, Naples and Paris as a goldsmith. By 1529 the re-installed pope needed Cellini’s skills in renewing Rome, appointing him Head of the Papal Mint. But the artist’s brother was murdered, leading Cellini to confront the killer and stabbing him very deeply. The pope told Cellini he should work hard and keep quiet. Cellini out-Caravaggio’d Caravaggio.
Patronage was the artist’s life-line, and when Pope Clement VII died in 1534, Cellini realised his days of papal support were numbered. The new Pope Paul III was a Farnese man with little interest in backing Medici supporters in Rome.
Cellini killed another rival, Pompeo de’ Capitaneis, and was exiled again. The pope absolved him but anti-Florentine factions within the papacy re-opposed him. Hearing that the French King Francis I was searching for artists to help transform his royal Fontainebleau Palace, Cellini headed to Paris. Unhappy with the reception he received, Cellini made the fateful decision to return to Rome in 1537.
The pope’s son Pier Luigi Farnese, Cellini’s nemesis, imprisoned him in the Castel Sant’Angelo! The artist was charged with stealing papal jewellery, and in one of the most harrowing accounts of imprisonment written then, Cellini described attempts to poison him. Instead he read the Bible and had a miraculous conversion, including visions of Christ. As papal machinations swirled him, powerful patrons like Ferrara Cardinal Ippolito d’Este Cellini finally got him released. His conversion should have led to glorious redemption, but reality was more violent.
Once free, Cellini returned to France and to Francis I’s patronage, some of Cellini’s happiest and most productive. He began working on larger sculptural projects, Francis being keen to show that his patronage of the arts rivalled that of the pope and of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. Cellini made the unusual, elegant salt cellar (see above).
Alas Cellini quarrelled openly with Francis I’s mistress and was accused again of sodomy. He returned to Florence in 1545 with the prospect of a powerful new patron: Duke Cosimo I de’ Medici. Cosimo had reasserted Medici control in Florence and wanted to commission a piece of large public art to celebrate Medici power: sculpture of Perseus slaying Medusa. This classical story represented the masculine Medici asserting their will over the feminine, malevolent republican ideals that typified the city’s recent rule. For 9 years Cellini worked on the Perseus, cast in bronze in one piece to outshine da Vinci.
The plague saw Cellini working in Mantua, Venice, Naples and Paris as a goldsmith. By 1529 the re-installed pope needed Cellini’s skills in renewing Rome, appointing him Head of the Papal Mint. But the artist’s brother was murdered, leading Cellini to confront the killer and stabbing him very deeply. The pope told Cellini he should work hard and keep quiet. Cellini out-Caravaggio’d Caravaggio.
Patronage was the artist’s life-line, and when Pope Clement VII died in 1534, Cellini realised his days of papal support were numbered. The new Pope Paul III was a Farnese man with little interest in backing Medici supporters in Rome.
Cellini killed another rival, Pompeo de’ Capitaneis, and was exiled again. The pope absolved him but anti-Florentine factions within the papacy re-opposed him. Hearing that the French King Francis I was searching for artists to help transform his royal Fontainebleau Palace, Cellini headed to Paris. Unhappy with the reception he received, Cellini made the fateful decision to return to Rome in 1537.
The pope’s son Pier Luigi Farnese, Cellini’s nemesis, imprisoned him in the Castel Sant’Angelo! The artist was charged with stealing papal jewellery, and in one of the most harrowing accounts of imprisonment written then, Cellini described attempts to poison him. Instead he read the Bible and had a miraculous conversion, including visions of Christ. As papal machinations swirled him, powerful patrons like Ferrara Cardinal Ippolito d’Este Cellini finally got him released. His conversion should have led to glorious redemption, but reality was more violent.
Once free, Cellini returned to France and to Francis I’s patronage, some of Cellini’s happiest and most productive. He began working on larger sculptural projects, Francis being keen to show that his patronage of the arts rivalled that of the pope and of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. Cellini made the unusual, elegant salt cellar (see above).
Alas Cellini quarrelled openly with Francis I’s mistress and was accused again of sodomy. He returned to Florence in 1545 with the prospect of a powerful new patron: Duke Cosimo I de’ Medici. Cosimo had reasserted Medici control in Florence and wanted to commission a piece of large public art to celebrate Medici power: sculpture of Perseus slaying Medusa. This classical story represented the masculine Medici asserting their will over the feminine, malevolent republican ideals that typified the city’s recent rule. For 9 years Cellini worked on the Perseus, cast in bronze in one piece to outshine da Vinci.
c1550, marble
Legion of Honour Museum, San Fran
In 1554 the Perseus statue was triumphantly unveiled in the Loggia dei Lanzi, opposite Michelangelo’s David. Perseus was holding up the severed head of Medusa; Cosimo was thrilled.
Sadly the artist was quarrelling with everyone, even Cosimo. He had a son by a different model and fought endlessly with artist Bartolommeo Bandinello (1493-1560). Bandinelli accused Cellini of being a dirty sodomite, in front of Cosimo!
Even when Cellini finally secured the critical adulation he craved, he injured another rival goldsmith, was arrested and gaoled in 1556. Released on bail, he was re-accused of sodomy by an apprentice the next year. Court records revealed he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 4 years’ gaol. Cosimo commuted the sentence to house arrest, but Cellini’s reputation never recovered.
Cellini married, fathered children with other models and servants. He turned to religion, working on a tall marble crucifix, but Cosimo wasn’t interested. Afterall there were younger, more exciting sculptors available. So Cellini withdrew and took religious vows, but renounced them after some years.
As Cellini’s influence at the Medici court waned, artist-writer Giorgio Vasari (1511–74) all but wrote the Florentine out of his influential book, The Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors and Architects.
Sadly the artist was quarrelling with everyone, even Cosimo. He had a son by a different model and fought endlessly with artist Bartolommeo Bandinello (1493-1560). Bandinelli accused Cellini of being a dirty sodomite, in front of Cosimo!
Even when Cellini finally secured the critical adulation he craved, he injured another rival goldsmith, was arrested and gaoled in 1556. Released on bail, he was re-accused of sodomy by an apprentice the next year. Court records revealed he pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 4 years’ gaol. Cosimo commuted the sentence to house arrest, but Cellini’s reputation never recovered.
Cellini married, fathered children with other models and servants. He turned to religion, working on a tall marble crucifix, but Cosimo wasn’t interested. Afterall there were younger, more exciting sculptors available. So Cellini withdrew and took religious vows, but renounced them after some years.
As Cellini’s influence at the Medici court waned, artist-writer Giorgio Vasari (1511–74) all but wrote the Florentine out of his influential book, The Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors and Architects.
Cellini's medal portrait of Pope Clement VII
1534
1534
Cellini died in Feb 1571 and this brawler-murderer was buried with great pomp in Santissima Annunziata Church. The funeral oration praised the fine disposition of Cellini’s incomparably virtuous life!
16 comments:
Was murder not a crime in Italy then? Or was murder a crime but Cellini didn't think he would be caught? Disgusting!
Greentrees
murder was always murder, so the trick was redefining the crime downwards. A man who killed his spouse, daughter or sister on finding her having carnal relations was never charged with murder. Ditto any murder that happened under an understandable violent emotion, compassion, despair or other morally relevant motive... usually received suspended sentences. When family honour was demeaned, a moral man was OBLIGED to respond. Ritual murders, of Jews or witches, could have been rewarded and not punished.
Did Cellini get dragged into court with each of his crimes? 1516, Cellini was in court about defending his brother, then he was charged with sodomy three times and found guilty twice. Only once was he convicted of murder as far as I can see, and DID get a death sentence *sigh*. Being friendly with the Pope was VERY handy.
Helen, look what I found.
Cellini’s account of his numerous amorous relationships give us insight. While it is difficult to determine if his relationships are typical of the times or more typical of a man whose character is consistently self-indulgent, some texts indicate that at least some of his behaviors conform to contemporary social norms. Other texts suggest that Cellini’s attitudes are remnants of medieval concepts about women and that their status had in fact risen much higher by the late Renaissance.
Cellini’s day was a highly negative image of women as materialistic and vain, prattling or downright evil. According to this view, women were not individuals but appendages; they existed to gratify the sexual, artistic, or social ambitions of a man. Such a mindset encouraged the rape of women in Cellini’s era.
Deb
Deb
great reference! Cellini’s sexual encounters include both females and males, especially young boys. In his day, sodomy was considered an unnatural sexual act but was commonly practised nonetheless, and Cellini wrote openly about it. For a man to engage in sodomy with young men was something of a rite of passage. But a man who made a habit of it was frowned upon, especially when he did so with young boys. So perhaps he didn't damage women any more than he damaged men.
And note another detail. Almost every one of Cellini's works honoured men.
Hi Hels - at some stage I'd love to read his story ... I know a little about him, but you've given us more here. A man of his times ... cheers Hilary
Hilary
very talented and very controversial, yes.
Quite a character. He certainly out-Caravagio'd Caravagio!
Rachel
I had no doubt about his artistic skills, but I had no idea about his self-assessments until reading The Autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini. He wrote that he was the greatest artist who ever lived, the man who was the best example of the spirit of the Italian Renaissance.
A flawed character but rather brilliant artist.
Andrew
I am beginning to think that the entire Italian Renaissance was brilliant artistically but flawed morally. Some of their art was filled with violence (eg Gentileschi, Mantegna) and some of their personal lives were filled with violence (eg Caravaggio, Cellini). Even later artists showed horrid violence (eg Ribera, Sirani, Poussin) in their art.
Boa tarde minha querida amiga. Obras de arte maravilhosas. Obrigado pela excelente matéria.
Luiz
when I was at uni (a very long time ago), fine arts were painting, sculpture and architecture. I, on the other hand, really loved gold and silver art. As did Cellini.
What a life he lived. Not content with his talent his life was one of violence and debauchery.
Fun60
There was almost an intellectual arrogance about him. He was very skilled, well connected and well travelled, and didn't have to limit his behaviours as other men had to.
That leaves US with a problem. If we love a piece of art (or music or literature etc) and the creator was a beast, should we patronise that artist?
He sounds like a pretty classic sociopath with a dose of narcissism thrown in
mem
narcissists always depend on the admiration they receive from others, especially from important people, and so they are extremely interested in the impression they leave on others. In Cellini's case, he did everything to impress the pope, French king, Holy Roman Emperor, Medici patrons etc.
But what a shame about the others Cellini came across: his rivals, mistresses, victims of sodomy, servants :(
Post a Comment