16 November 2024

young Russians & 1917 Revolution

Andy Willimott wrote an excellent journal article on a generation of young Russians who embraced new ideals of socialist living. I have added my own family’s experience in this amazing era.

Communist Youth League/Komsomol, 
The youth were healthy, ideological and proud
1924 poster

The October Revolution, which started when the Bolsheviks seized the Winter Palace on 25th Oct 1917, promised a new future. It became a radical break with the past of Tsarist aut­ocracy, exploitation and misery. Bolsheviks were later willing to use viol­ence in pursuit of their goals but import­antly, the Bol­sh­eviks galvanised hopes that had gained momentum during 1917. Socialist visions offered an attractive altern­at­ive to the horrid rest­r­ictions of tsarist autocracy, monarchy, nob­il­ity, Church, private ownership and worker exploitation.

The new social and political order of Oct 1917 offered an escape from the inherited world for the oppressed. This is why the Soviet Union continued to be held up as an alternative historic path throughout the C20th, even after its earliest ideals were later corrupt­ed. It offered an alternative to the injustices of the old imperial order, to the cruelties of modern capitalism.

As the Bolsheviks came to power, factory workers rejected the clearest symbol of exploitation: bosses. Awful managers were carted out of the factory doors and dumped. Some workers went on to form factory committees, replacing sym­bols of old authority and implem­enting workers control. At home and work, citizens of the newly formed Soviet republic drank tea and discussed social­ist enfran­chisement.

One section of society was most susceptible to the promise of a new future: youths belonged to the future and had the tend­ency to reject their parents’ old ways. Soviet youth literature prom­ot­ed the idea that life could be rationally redesigned to foster social­ism, reshaping culture and society, with Soviet youths in the vanguard.

My grandfather was a perfect example. Born in 1898 as the third last of a very large group of Russian siblings, he was 19 during the Russian Revolution. He and his siblings were mesmerised by the rise of socialism and the free­dom it offered their impoverished, working class, Jewish family who remembered the pogroms so clearly. He ded­icated the rest of his life to volunteerism, equality of all citizens, provis­ion of community services to ordinary families, and educational facilities for the Jewish community. In Australia he was a core member of the Labour Party.

The communes, in university dormitories or elsewhere, were res­id­ential spaces in which young radicals sought to establish living social­ism. All moneys were placed communally and shared; all possess­ions be­came shared agricultural property; and each inhabit­ant vow­ed to live in a comradely fashion. By the mid-1920s, many thousands of young activists were ins­p­ired to replicate communal living, mainly in the cities of central Eur­opean Russia. By the later 1920s Komsomol-Communist Youth League saw more and more youths becoming engaged in commune life, providing a space for act­ivist initiative. And for working in well designed factories.

The young socialists allocated rooms for collective events, and for leisure activities. Sexism in the alloc­at­ion of tasks had to end. Hence each commune also allocated the cleaning and cooking fairly between the sexes. Replacing private kitchens with mun­icipal canteens in every city and workplace provided better nutrit­ion, released women into the workforce and fostered a fairer social order.

The communes also discussed sexual equality. The issue of children was raised at the weekly discuss­ions, de­ciding that it was best to use contraception for the time being. It was agreed that if children were conceived, they should be afforded by the community. The biol­og­ical parents would have to place the children in shared pre-schools and schools, returning to their parents after work. But after a few months, the commune de­cided that relations between inhabitants should not be entered into lightly, lest personal divisions and animosity set in.

Striking women workers kick-started the Feb 1917 revolution. 
Then, after the Oct revolution, gained full legal equality.
1920 poster 

This was all part of a struggle for new morals which, across the 1920s, was being referred to as a Cultural Revolut­ion in the press. Leon Trotsky also drew attention to the con­cept of cultural revolution with his publication Questions of Everyday Life 1923; new standards of behaviour and social norms were crucial to the long-term health of the new revolut­ionary state.

The October Revol­ution stimulated a range of social and cultural act­iv­ism in the opening decade of the new Soviet state. The Prolet­ar­ian Cultural-Education Association was a movement of local groups and work­ers clubs that promoted artists & poets, as well as a new working-class aesth­etic in art more generally. The movement peaked in 1920. 

The revolution's emotional energy remained an important cornerstone of the Soviet state, bringing grand utopian visions to life. The best ex­­am­ple outside Russia was Israel's kibbutz movement. Those kibbutz­im founded in the 1920s tended to be larger and more Russian-oriented than those kibbutzim founded prior to WW1, so the issues the members debated were exactly those raised in Willimott’s journal article: shared factory or agricultural equipment, shared work clothing, who does the cooking, who does child care, volunteerism, army service etc. When I did my Gap Year in Israel in the mid 1960s, the kibbutz meetings each month were still discussing the same ideological debates that arose in the Russian communes after the 1917 Revolution.






21 comments:

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

This was really interesting because I know bugga all about Russia I have have heard of things like the Russian Revolution and the Bolsheviks but really know nothing.

jabblog said...

It sounds more like the kibbutz movement. | wonder what they thought as idealism became communism and the shackling of the individual. Communism has never succeeded.

roentare said...

It was a time of ideas and creativity. As usual, these idealisms are often corrupted later on.

Ирина Полещенко said...

Hello, Helen! What common children are you talking about? Common clothes? Common income? Were women also common?
This never happened!!! It's not true! After the 1917 revolution, all workers continued to live with their families in their own homes or in rented premises.

Maybe someone lived in a commune, but this was an exception to the rule.

Deb said...

Maxim Gorky was also a cultural hero of those years.

Hels said...

Jo-Anne
Nothing stays the same in this world. According to Franklin D Roosevelt, three countries together formed what was called the WW2 Allies. The Big Three in 1942 comprised Great Britain, USA and the Soviet Union. That strong alliance must have changed rapidly in the post-war era.

Hels said...

jabblog
ordinary working families were brutally oppressed before the Revolution by tsarist autocracy, monarchy, nob­il­ity, Church and worker exploitation. The tsarist regime may have ended but the end of the revolutionary period was in 1922 and onwards; the Russian Civil War concluded with the defeat of the White Army etc, leading to mass emigration, including my family.
Communism, alas, took over.

Hels said...

roentare
creativity, equality, end of sexist limitations on women etc etc.. it must have been a time of great hope in the nation.
I suppose true democracies struggle everywhere, but ended faster in Russia :(

Hels said...

Irina
Í am sorry I wrote the word "common" once .. instead of the word "shared". I changed it immediately. The moral standards of the nation and its communities were raised, not lowered.

Hels said...

Deb
Gorky publicly opposed the Tsarist regime. This short-story writer and novelist first attracted attention with stories that supported pacifism, internationalism and anti-war protests. Gorky finished his trilogy abroad, where he also wrote the stories published in Rasskazy 1922–4, among his best work. From 1924 he lived in Sorrento Italy, inviting many Russian artists and writers who were keen to remain with him. Gorky was disillusioned by post-revolutionary life in Russia, but in 1928 he yielded to pressures to return.

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, I suppose all idealistic systems have advantages as well as disadvantages, and what corresponds to each category is very personal. About the common upbringing of children, I imagine many parents were heartbroken. I read a book about the North Union Shakers (of what later became Shaker Heights, Ohio), and I marked this passage about a boy who was separated from his parents: "On a visit to my mother on a certain occasion she walked with me on my leaving, and when we were out of sight of others, she drew me close to her and kissed me on the forehead. This was a long cherished moment in my life."
--Jim

Hels said...

Parnassus
idealistic systems need to be measured by the morality of their goals, not whether they have some failures in their own time or were destroyed by later enemy systems. Having the goals of universal medical care, for example, meant that working families could be treated in decent hospitals, just as wealthy families could. Fearfully expensive for the state of course, but highly moral.

Young children being placed daily in pre-school care services meant that both parents could work, then pick up their toddlers after work, take them home for tea, family time together and sleeping at home. I know the child care services were often crowded and understaffed, but I admired their dreams greatly.

Ирина Полещенко said...

Dear Helen, I'm sorry, but people didn't live in communes after the 1917 revolution. It was the First World War. Everyone went to the front.

My name is Erika. said...

Did your grandfather have disillusionment and that's why he immigrated? Or were there other reasons. I can see why young people would have been excited with the new government, but I do wonder how many were let down once the country didn't get as much freedom as they hoped-especially when Stalin came along . Those young people wouldn't be as young any more.

Mandy said...

What a fascinating post. It's interesting that you draw the line to Israel and kibbutzim. At Wits University (Johannesburg) in the early 90s (before the fall of apartheid), our sociology and politics departments were heavily communist-leaning. Like your grandfather in 1917, we had a great sense of a brave new world and the moral good that communism could bring to the new South Africa.

hels said...

Erika
Many honourable movements eventually fell apart after the young, poor and progressive generations were defeated by the military or by the powerful classes. Think of Germany's Weimar Republic, eventually destroyed by the Nazis.

Hels said...

Mandy
Idealists who wanted to create model societies in Russia developed their dreams and values from their own national history, or from societies in other countries. The first kibbutzim were planned and started in 1910 ->, so the young Russian socialists carefully examined those early Israeli agriculture settlements. Not perfect of course, but kibbutz socialism provided an excellent role model.

hels said...

Do you have a reference you can recommend?

Hank Phillips said...

The most striking Soviet revelation was a short scene in Dziga Vertov's 1929 "Man With a Movie Camera," deleted by Western looter censors. Near the end, where pub barmaids lustily uncapped the banned and evil narcotic BEER, a gent in a crowded train statin snorts ridiculous amounts of something from a folded parchment. This segues into a shot of dangerous looking powder-on-mirror whutevah. This entire segment was deleted in an Americanized fit of "Cinema Paradiso" benevolent censorship that masked the bohemian appeal of a civilization that--whatever its failings, fables and fantasies--dared to snub Republican Quaker Prohibitionist Ordered Liberty in every and all of its facets. Censorship--by whatever version of embarrassed looter altruism--is the same thing National Socialists enforced with the death sentence.

Hels said...

Hank
if Man with a Movie Camera argued for documentary films to provide a eyewitness in a proletariat society. The film is an impressionistic view of urban daily life.

Hels said...

Hank

if Man with a Movie Camera showed how documentary films provided accurate eyewitness evidence in a working class society, who would have censored and deleted it? Were copies kept and distributed widely?