09 May 2020

Gender, Orientalism and the Jewish Nation: EM Lilien ..... guest post

In January 2020, Bloomsbury Academic Press published Dr Lynne Swarts’ first book, encompassing her passion for intellectual int­ersections: modern European history, Jewish history, gender studies and visual culture. Gender, Orientalism and the Jewish Nation: Women in the Work of Ephraim Moses Lilien at the German Fin de Siècle is about one of the important (but overlooked) Jewish artists of modern times, Ephraim Moses Lilien (1874–1925).

EM Lilien,
Das stille Lied, c1900,
Judo.


EM Lilien has been romanticised or demonised, depending on one’s view, as the first major Zionist artist. Surprisingly there has been little in-depth scholarly research and analysis of Lil­ien's work available in English, and so this research makes an important contribution to historical scholarship. Most of the hist­or­iography on Lilien so far has concentrated on his ground-breaking iconography of the muscular (male) Jewish body, much discussed amongst scholars of Israeli and Zionist art histography. There has been little debate on his images of the modern Jewish women.

Lilien was a superb illustrator, printer, photographer and film maker. Born in Drohobycz, at the base of the Carpathian Mountains in the Hapsburg Empire in 1874, Lilien went to art school in Krakow before ending up in Munich. Arriving in 1896, he worked for the fledgling Jugend art magazine as an illustrator and photographer. This was when the journal was first published, and Jugendstil (named after the rebellious style) became a household name. With the same ability to sense new moments in art history, he moved to Berlin in 1899, just as Berlin was taking over as the centre of the German art world.

In Berlin Lilien collaborated with Börries von Münchhausen (1874–1945) on a book titled Juda (c1900). The book became an overnight sensation. Von Münchhausen, fascinated by German Romantic poetry, composed a series of Hebrew Ballads that Lilien illustrated. In perhaps the most well-known illustration from these ballads, Das stille Lied, Lilien fashioned a new, modern and Jewish artistic style, a fresh interpretation of Jugendstil for a very different audience. As Juda, the male hero of the story, kisses his female lover, their bodies dissolve into an erotic, sensual embrace.

Juda’s cloak, with its decorative, flat Jugendstil patterns, swirls around them, helping to convey their passionate, exotic or Oriental love. For Lilien’s Jewish German audiences, the kiss was not a gen­eric Germanic kiss but a specifically Jewish kiss, with the hand­some Juda looking a little like Herzl. The emphasis on handsome good looks and normative sexuality were all part of the Zionist body aesthetics that encouraged strong, heterosexual, manly behaviour.

His images of muscular new Jews, tilling the soil like their socialist brethren, helped launch Lilien’s career. Martin Buber (1878–1965) and the cultural Zionists, who believed that Jewish re­newal would be based on culture not politics, were happy to praise Juda for its depiction of ancient male heroes. Lilien became the darling and hope of their movement. However his depiction of a Jew­ish woman as licentious or submissive was passed over in silence.

EM Lilien at his drafting table in c1902,
National Library of Israel, Jerusalem. 

Wikicommons

This book concentrates on Lilien’s female imagery and divides them into 3 separate genres:
1. his non-Jewish femmes fatales (similar to other non-Jewish successful avant-garde artists);
2. his images of courageous Jewish biblical heroines; and
3. his more sensuous images of Jewish orientalised women with a certain amount of sexual agency.

Lilien merges misogynist Jugendstil aka Art Nouveau images of the femme fatale with a western Orientalism, that often worshipped the exoticism and unbridled sexuality of the eastern other. The book argues that his use of orientalism as an artistic style to repres­ent images of strong heroic Jewish women was not a part of these white, Western, male fantasies. Rather his images represented a fundamental and critical attempt to explore the complexities of German and Jewish identity.

To Lilien, the Orient was not simply a fanciful place, but an internal space to explore multiple and transnational identities. Lilien was part of an increasingly large, ingenious and active group of fin-de-siècle Jewish writers, poets and artists whose response to the problems of otherness was to view German Jewish orientalism as an inspiration that would help explain their multiple identities.

Lilien searched in his oriental and biblical imagery for an authentic Jewish identity that would help overcome how non-Jewish Germans perceived or classified him and his fellow Jews: as being ‘not quite white’ and certainly ‘not quite German’ i.e as barbaric Asiatics or Orientals. Lilien’s sense of otherness not only prod­uced tensions between his apparent Germanness and Jewishness but demanded a psychological gestalt or answer to the perennial quest­ion that Buber’s spiritual ideas had posed to the cultural Zionists on the Jewish essence. His images of orientalised Jewish women form part of that search for identity, roots and meaning. Grounded in their European origins, Lilien’s images were, also part of the quest for a Jewish and authentic oriental voice.

Concentrating mainly on his illustrations for journals and books, the book acknowledges the importance of Lilien's ground-breaking male iconography in Zionist art. Like other vanguard male artists at the end of the C19th, painting continued to be a male preserve. Lilien’s work mirrored the misogyny inherent amongst non-Jewish avant-garde artists. As a secular Zionist, Lilien pushed the limits of Jewish visual representation in the interests of Jewish cultural literacy. The modern Jewess who emerges from the shadows or blind spots of the gendered male historiography is a distinctly contemporary figure. Lilien's female images offer a compelling glimpse of an alternate, independent and often sexually liberated modern Jewish woman, a portrayal that often eluded the Zionist imagination.

Using an interdisciplinary approach to integrate intellectual and cultural history with issues of gender, Jewish history and visual culture, the book explores the important fin de siècle tensions between European and Oriental expressions of Jewish femininity. Gender, Orientalism and the Jewish Nation demonstrates that Lilien was not a minor figure in Europe's art scene, but a major fig­ure whose work needs re-reading in light of his cosmopolitan and national artistic genius.


Dr Swarts is a Sydney historian and academic. Her book Gender, Orientalism and the Jewish Nation can be purchased here.








13 comments:

Train Man said...

Well done Lynne. Hope it goes well. Why has it been relatively easy to unite European history, Jewish history and art, but not gender studies? I would have thought women's appearance was becoming much more visible at the turn of the century.

Joseph said...

Lynne

The only two Lilien images I knew very well were the illustration Lilien created for the Fifth Zionist Congress, 1901-02 and Autumn Melodies. Were the others hidden away somewhere?

Parnassus said...

I can see that Swarts has done a good job of analyzing Lilien's female imagery, but I am left wondering about a few things. The first is that there seems to be a certain implied criticism of Lilien's depictions of Jewish women, but (according to Swarts) how were they supposed to be depicted? Another question is that Lilien's images look to me like standard Orientalism merging into Art Nouveau. We need to know how Lilien's work differs from or fits into the pattern of the art world taking place around him. For instance, Jewish women because of their background easily adapt into the Orientalist framework, but in the 1907 potboiler Three Weeks by Elinor Glyn, the seductive woman is also heavily Orientalized with all of her tiger skins, mysterious exotic surroundings, and so forth.
--Jim

Lynneswarts.com said...

Thanks for your question train man. Though women began to enter some professions at the turn of the twentieth century, they were often eroticised and sexualised as artist’s muses or actors. Images of women as serious scholarly subjects in art history only began in the late 1970s and then slowly affected the studies of
gender in Jewish history and art history a little later.

Anonymous said...

As you would expect from me, I go for the base, and muscular Jewish men works for me.

Hels said...

Andrew....

me too!!!
But your interest was shallow and my interest was more intellectual :)

Lynneswarts.com said...

Hi Joseph,

Thanks for your question.

No there are many more. He illustrated three major Jewish texts:
’Juda’ c. 1900
‘The Songs Of the Ghetto’ 1903
And the three volumes of ‘The Books Of the Bible’ 1909- 1912

And then his many illustrations for major and minor illustrated magazines such as ‘Jugend’ and ’Simplicissiismus‘

Deb said...

Lynne

Who knew anti Semites attributed effeminacy to Jewish men. Men living on Eastern European farms or kibbutzes, working on the farm by day and guarding by night, must have re-masculinized the image.

Lynneswarts.com said...

Yes it sure did!

Lynneswarts.com said...

Thanks for your comments Jim. My criticisms are only that some of his images of non-Jewish women are as misogynist as any other male avante-garde artist working at the turn of the twentieth century. His images of Jewish women are much more complex, beautiful and layered than that. My book and conclusions detail at great length that many of his images of Jewish women are surprisingly modern, fresh and contemporary.

Hels said...

Lynne

Thank you for writing a guest post and for responding to the readers. I love guest posts because they expand the thinking of the blogger, beyond what is comfortable and familiar.

Be healthy in these tough times.

mem said...

I am a bit bemused by the whole idea of Orientalism in Jewish culture given that I would imagine the vast majority of Jewish people in the world are and have been for hundreds or even thousands of years European, in their recent origins. Yes they left the holy land and maintained strong social and religious ties to each other but to claim Orientalism as part of their identity is surely one of choice rather than fact ???
I can see the attraction and beauty of these images and the casting of thee male as this strong powerful muscular being is very enticing to building esteem in a dominant culture which didn't necessarily have such a positive view of these "other " people

Lynneswarts.com said...

Thank you Mem for your comments and you are not alone in your thinking about Orientalism.
All Jews were only part of the Orient up until the destruction of the second temple and many still remained part of the Orient after this period located throughout modern day Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia. Of course our sacred texts were also set there.

Remember too that Mizrachi (eastern ) Jews were not part of Europe and Sephardic Jews too have historical associations with the east as well. So although you are correct in regard to Ashkenazi Jews, the idea of the East or Orient in the Jewish imagination is very old.

What I haven’t discussed so far is that Orientalism was also a part of a political idea associated with Edward’s Said’s classic text with the same name written in 1978. I go into great details about this and you may need to take a look at my book for my thoughts regarding these ideas.