28 September 2019

Strong American Women Part III - Protestant women in the KKK

The Ku Klux Klan Revival did not occur till 1915 when William Sim­m­ons created a vision of a noble, antebellum South without blacks. Just then the USA was struggling to manage huge waves of immig­rants, many Cath­olic or Jewish, and few of them native English speakers. App­ealing to the middle class and claiming to be a purely benevolent club, the Klan attracted women members immediately.

By 1921, the Klan numbered c100,000 members! At its peak in 1924, 40,000 uniformed Klansmen paraded through the streets of Wash­ing­ton DC during the Democratic National Convent­ion. The group was so in­fluential many pol­iticians felt com­pelled to publicly support it or even to join, particularly in the Mid­west­ern states.

The 1920s marked the best years of the Women of the KKK/WKKK, right at the time when wo­m­en had been enfranchised in 1920 and were op­tim­istic about participating in civic life. Important and educated women were invited to a lecture where the topics ranged from the importance of the Bible and of education, to upholding the American Way. The female lect­ur­er asked the women if they would like to join a secret society dedicated to protecting these values. The women were then given white robes and white hoods, and a huge cross engulfed in flames. 

Ku Klux Klan Ladies' Auxiliary float 
Celebrating Ohio’s Centennial, 1925 
Signs proclaim Protestantism, Womanhood and Public Schools. 
Credit: Ohio Memory Collection 

As Kathleen Blee noted in Women of the Klan, many believed that moral women (in every country) were either neutral about racism or were inspired by equality and just­ice; that women would NEVER approve of slavery or lynchings. As a result, many people greatly under­estimated wom­en’s con­tribution to KKK revival. Centred in Little Rock Arkansas and spread across the nation, half a million women joined the KKK during this era!!

WKKK members were not peripheral; they were major actors in the Klan. They were successful largely because a] the women were better at public relations than the men, and b] women were better at hiding their white supremacist mission behind a facade of Social Welfare.

Pamphlets from the WKKK asked women: “Are you interested in the Welfare of our Nat­ion? As an Enfranchised woman are you interested in better gov­er­n­ment? Should we not interest ourselves in better education for our children?” The women organised parades and food drives, with the benefits sent to Klan families or orphanages.

Clearly the WKKK normalised the extremist actions of the men’s KKK, and also advanced a version of the white Protestant agenda that was all their own. As Catholic and Jewish immigrants arrived by ship, the WKKK’s preference for American-born citizens merged with early femin­ism.

Back in the C19th, the KKK publicly stated, White Ladies had been ravished by Negro Men. And because Black Men were still a threat to pure, Protestant women in the 1920s, the KKK used the symbol of the white damsel in distress to gal­vanise racist fury. This theme was most starkly captured in DW Griffith’s 1915 pro-KKK film, Birth of a Nation, where a white woman heroically leapt off a cliff to avoid being tainted by a black man (actually a white actor in blackface).

Now the women wanted to stand alongside their men and help with pro­tecting the fair sex. The WKKK recruited female citiz­ens above 18 who were not Catholic, socialist or Jewish. The recruits needed to be a resident in a Klan jurisdiction for 6 months and endorsed by Klanswomen. Women in the WKKK were not socially marginal people who turned their misery against rac­ial or religious minorities. Rather they were from stable, middle-class communities.

WKKK members appealed to Klan values and believed could promote women’s purity. KKK women had to sal­vage the moral values that had been corrupted by modern society and by foreigners. Women lobbied for national quotas for immig­ration, racial seg­reg­at­ion and anti-miscegenation i.e inter­breeding laws. And they vigorously promoted white supremacy, and opposed to the rising tide of colour.

Pennsylvania women Ku Klux Klan members in Washington D.C. 
for a march in 1926. 
Photo credit: Timeline 

Additionally Klan women wanted to use their power to improve life at home, within the church and in society. The happiness of the home and the welfare of the state were important; the Bible was the one sure foundation of true Americanism. Progressives similarly assoc­iated motherhood with the home and expanded the image of the home to represent domestic America. The essence of motherhood that Klan­s­men had used to underscore male supremacy became, in the Prog­ress­ive era, a tool that women could employ for their own objectives.

Conflict arose regarding gender equity, because the Klan adhered to rules of moral conservatism i.e male authority should exist in politics as well as in the home. So conflict was inevitable in the 1920s. Allowing women to have a voice in politics would bring them outside the home, where the men believed women belonged.

Another WKKK goal was to educ­ate women in the science of government and American history. Some chapters wanted to assist all Protestant women in the study of practical politics i.e to impartially scrutinise the platforms of political parties and the declared principles of all civic organisations. Although the WKKK was openly racist, anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic, its goals of improving society and educating women were relatively progressive. I don’t like the KKK's values, but I do truly admire the women's guts.

Once the racism and violence of both the KKK and WKKK became harder to conceal by the end of the decade, the organisation began to dis­perse. If the women wanted to maintain their KKK ideologies, they had to move into other forms of civic bodies eg national politics.

Read Kathleen Blee, Women of the Klan: Racism and Gender in the 1920s 1992. And Jackie Hill,  Progressive Values in the Women's Ku Klux Klan 2008






14 comments:

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, I can't buy all this "improve home life" agenda, and I am sure that women and others of the time were not fooled either, especially when white hoods and crosses were involved. A lot of this racist movement relied on the women-on-a-pedestal premise of innocence and domesticity, but these KKK women were just as vicious and as guilty as anyone else in the movement--much worse, in fact, since their actions were pure hypocrisy when compared to their phony-idealistic rhetoric.
--Jim

Hels said...

Parnassus

organisations could publish explicitly moral and progressive policies either
1] to fool outsiders about their real, less attractive goals or
2] because the women truly believed in their power to improve life at home, within the church and in American society.

If the second option was true, I don't think it was hypocritical of the individual women to fund and run quality orphanages for Klan children. Modern historians who run a rhetoric of women's rights with nasty right‐wing political agendas, however, have an uphill battle.

Deb said...

Was Birth of a Nation ever criticised, censored or banned?

Hels said...

Deb

au contraire. Since this 1915 film showed black men to be brutal, lazy, dirty and degenerate, most whites seemed to think the film was cleverly created and accurate. There were some protests outside cinemas in northern cities and the NAACP called for the film to be banned. But all I can find was a (reluctant) agreement to cut out a couple of the most offensive scenes.

DW Griffith became something of a hero.

bazza said...

I have found very few situations in life are black or white. Even in the most extreme cases one can see some positives ("well at least he made the trains run on time"). Mostly we choose, consciously or not, to take a polarised view. It would be very difficult to make an argument in favour of the benefits of fascism for example. You have been brave here in putting what would typically be an unpopular but justified viewpoint.
As a current example take the madness surrounding Brexit. I voted to remain and I would again but my feeling is 70:30. I am in favour of the economic union but not the political one. However, there is no political discussion of the middle-ground - only extremely polarised politics! God help us all!
CLICK HERE for Bazza’s knowingly knackered Blog ‘To Discover Ice’

Hilary Melton-Butcher said...

Hi Hels - polarisation is all around us - Greta Thunberg is another ... I just wish we'd think. I really need to read these articles and will at some stage ... you're articles are always full of educative information. Cheers Hilary

Hels said...

bazza

Tolerating differing opinions was always the mark of a modern democracy! And although I find fascism and racism to be totally repugnant, I suppose all people are entitled to believe whatever they want. As long as they don't harm ANY other member of the community through their words or behaviours.

You are spot on about the loss of a middle ground. Extremely polarised politics seem to be appearing all around the world :(

Hels said...

Hilary

I know you are right about young Greta. 10 years ago people would have loved what she was saying, or turned off the TV if she was boring. Now people either love what she was saying, or they viciously attack her age, sexual unattractivess, her mental health and her accent.

Another new division to emerge has been the vegetarian Vs meat eater division. Surely what people eat is a private, family decision.

mem said...

oh YUCK.I am just too disgusted for words by this sort of thinking . I am actually fin=ding it hard to cope with members of my own family who I love but really am finding it hard to like or respect who have views similar to this. Its very hard on a daily basis to accept peoples right to be revolting

Anonymous said...

So it was not all red necked males in the KKK. Like we should study our own failings with our Aborigines, so the US should study its KKK history.

Hels said...

mem

Agreed... very hard. Not only do they have the right to be revolting.. they even have the right to marry into our caring families. One of my in laws pushed for my beautiful elderly mother to be euthenased because mum was using health care service that could be better used by young patients. That sounds like Nazi policy to me :(

Hels said...

Andrew

*nod* All accepted history has to be reexamined, as more evidence gets published.

I didn't realise how anti-Catholic the KKK were, how enthusiastic Protestant women were to join the KKK (at least in the Revival Period) and how wide a range of ideological beliefs there were amongst the men.

Maryum javed said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Hels said...

Maryum javed

thanks for reading the article, but no advertising please.