17 January 2023

Elgin Marbles - the endless Britain Vs Greece conflict.

The Elgin Marbles aka Parthenon sculptures were a marble frieze Doric temple on the Acropolis Greece, built in c440 BC and dedic­at­­­ed to Goddess Ath­ena. The temple was the centre­piece of an ambit­ious building programme in Athens. But in 1687 the temple, after c2,000 years, was damaged in the Venice-Ottoman Empire War. 

Acropolis of Athens,
world's most striking extant ancient Greek monumental complex

The Marbles were str­ipped from the Acropolis and shipped to UK by Scot­tish nobl­eman 7th Earl Lord Elgin Thomas Bruce, who served as British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire (1799-1803). Elgin’s let­ter granted him permission to take the art objects as a personal gest­ure, after encour­ag­ing the British forces into Ottoman Egypt.

Thomas Bruce, 7th Earl of Elgin (1766-1841)
Wiki

The collection holds half of the surviving Parth­enon: 247’ of the original 524’ frieze; 15 of 92 metopes; 17 figures from the pedim­ents, and objects from other Acropolis temples. At first the art was publicly ex­hib­ited in Elgin’s Park Lane mansion, at­t­r­acting in­terest from pot­ential buyers. Then, invited by British Mu­seum trust­ees, Elgin chose to sell to the Briti­sh government, to pay his debts. 

Elgin Marbles on display at the British Museum, 1961.
History Today

In June 1816 a Commons’ Select Committee found the Mar­bles had been hon­ourably acquired and would great­ly increase Britain’s art­ist­ic wealth. The Committee set the price at £35,000, not the £74,000 that El­g­in re­qu­ested. The House won the vote for the pur­chase and a sub­sequent Act of Parliam­ent gave the collect­ion in perpetuity to British Museum trustees. 
                       
marble slabs were part of the frieze that ran around the Parth­en­on
The Chronicle

Britain never seriously con­sidered returning the Elgin Marbles sc­ulpt­ures to Athens. Since c1890 successive govern­­ments have argued that:
1.they are more accessible in the British Mus­eum;
2.their return will be a pre­­­c­edent that's reg­ret­ted later;
3.Athens offered less secur­ity than London.

Architect Robert Smirke built the Elgin Room, finally completed in 1832 and later ext­ended into ad­jacent galleries. Bec­ause the marble slabs were actual­ly part of the frieze that ran around the Parth­en­on ins­ide the peristyle, they should have been called the Parth­enon Frieze.

Domestic consensus about keeping the Mar­b­les broke down when Parliament debated their purch­ase. MP Hugh Hammersley urged the Commons for an am­endment, saying Britain holds these mar­bles only in trust till they are demanded by the present, or future owners of Athens City. This was bef­ore the Greeks revolted against the Ottomans and, with Brit­ish assis­t­ance, set up their own state in southern Bal­­kan Pen­in­sula. In 1834 the Bavarian reg­en­cy, assist­ing Greece’s first king Otto, chose Athens as the king­dom’s new cap­ital, insp­ired by old western civil­is­ation!

Elgin’s marbles were acquired in 1801-5, but it was Greece’s entry in­to WW2 that reheated the issue. When Mussolini’s army invaded Greece from Italian-held Albania in Oct 1940, Britain and its Empire st­ood vir­tually alone in the war. The Greeks soon pushed the invaders back into Albania. Still reeling from defeat in France and from the Blitz, the British public could finally be optimistic about this Axis reversal.

Greek dictator Ioannis Met­axas feared pre­cip­itat­ing a German attack, yet keeping Greece in the war was a major British policy. Winston Churchill wanted the war in Albania to become a ma­jor divers­ion against both Italy and Germany. For months British sup­port for the Greek war effort was limited to scarce supplies, and the idea of British con­cess­ions to Greece couldn’t be ne­gotiated until af­ter Germany invaded Greece in Ap 1941. Greek nation­al­ists also laid claim Britain’s Cyprus, with its majority Greek population.

The Marbles were discussed in The Times by writer H.B Fyfe in Dec 1940 when the British Museum’s objects were hidden in the old Aldwy­ch Tube St­ation. Fyfe wanted a prime minist­erial pledge to return the Mar­bles post-war, tangible proof of Brit­ish gratitude to their Greek ally. By Jan 1941, 9 more Times articles appeared, for or agin Fyfe’s proposal.

Conservative MP Thelma Cazalet-Keir raised the issue in the Commons in late 1940, asking the prime minister for legislation to return the Mar­b­les post-war. Being the interm­ed­iary between the British Mus­eum and Par­l­iament, Treasury undertook to prepare the govern­ment’s reply. In Jan 1941, Fo­r­­eign Secretary An­thony Eden’s view was that the dis­cus­s­ion re­quired a neutral reply. But in its reco­m­mendation to the Treas­ury, the Foreign Office remained open to sympathetic consid­erat­ion of the issue. Yet Lord Privy Seal Clement Attlee brought no legisl­ation.

Melina Mer­couri, Greek minister for Cult­ure campaigned for the Marbles’ return until 1994. Later the rebuilt Acropolis Museum in Athens tried to offset counter-arguments i.e 1] safe-keeping and 2] access­ib­il­ity. The rectang­ular cement core of its Parth­enon Gallery was designed for the missing parts of the frieze!
                             
Parthenon sculptures of Ancient Greece, British Museum.
ARTnews

We cannot judge Lord Elgin by today’s standards. While taking artworks would trigger disgrace now, during Elgin's era it was common for wealthy tourists to collect ancient treasures, inc­l­uding the Parth­enon. As a genuine art lover, Elgin received authority to take what he wished.

In Aug 2013, UNESCO’s Director General for Culture wrote a letter to the Director of the Brit­ish Mus­eum and British Minister for Culture, pro­pos­ing a mediat­ion process. But the UK Government and the British Museum Tr­ustees each declin­ed in 2015; so Athens returned to reclaiming the arte­facts via diplomatic-political means. Greece noted that its nation­al goal, returning the Parthenon Scul­p­tures to Ath­ens, was agreed by UNESCO’s decision in Sept 2021

Fragments of the Parthenon frieze remain, in other European museums. Recently Palermo reported that a Goddess Artemis fragment be­l­ong­­ing to the Parthenon’s east­ern frieze on loan from Sic­ily’s Archaeol­og­ical Museum will remain in Ath­ens. And the Vatican will return Marble fragments from the Vatican Museums, "donations from the Pope".

Read William St Clair, Lord Elgin and the Marbles (1967)  and Tessa Solomon in Artnews.




24 comments:

Cro Magnon said...

Elgin probably paid for the marbles. Lining pockets always worked, and the authorities would have told him to say nothing. What after the marbles? Are all museums to be made to return all foreign exhibits? Will our museums all become filled with native objects? It would be a sad world.

Joe said...

One man's treasure is another man's trash. What the Greeks saw as shameless plunder, the British saw as a reward for their forces being supportive.

roentare said...

Eventually there will be nothing left in British museum lol. Everyone country wants their own heritages returned. Sundowning Britain

Hels said...

Cro

Elgin may well have paid for the marbles, if not in cash then in services rendered. But it would be terrible if all museums were forced to return every object/document that they hold from all other countries. That would mean that I would never ever see Swedish or Danish or Dutch collectables, unless I spent a lot of time there.

No, most objects and documents would stay in the museums they currently sit in, unless the legitimate owners want them back and the courts agree.

bazza said...

I think that the Elgin Marbles genuinely mean much more to the Greeks than they do to the British. Therefore I say, "Give 'em back already!"
They are not really high on the British artistic sensibilities. However I do think this is a unique case. For example I would not want Mona Lisa to be removed from the Louvre and all the other artworks which are not currently in their country of origin to be sent home!
CLICK HERE for Bazza’s readily renewable Blog ‘To Discover Ice’

Hels said...

Joe

it happens all over the world. Consider the art, artefacts and lands of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders which might have been given to foreigners as legitimate gifts or exchanged products. Even more likely, I would imagine, they were taken without consent.

Since power changes over the centuries, and views change as well, we cannot assume that the possible return of cultural heritage items means as much to those distant museums as it does to First Nations people today.

Hels said...

roentare

you would be correct if EVERY single object/document was returned from other museums in other countries.

Let us say that when the tough facts of colonisation and war crimes against humanity became clearer in the 20th century, museums could still negotiate with sensitivity. For example: if I send back Bronze plaques from the Kingdom of Benin, I can expect .... from you. Tough, but not impossible.

Hels said...

bazza

even if the museum's objects were not really high on the British artistic sensibilities, I agree with you... I would still not want all the artworks that are not currently in their country of origin to be sent home! The trouble is: how do the courts decide who was the real owner originally? and was the object stolen, battered or gifted centuries ago?

Amazon said...

"The Elgin Marbles: Should they be Returned to Greece?" by Christopher Hitchens, 1998

In this first full-length work on this fiercely debated issue, Christopher Hitchens recounts the history of these precious sculptures and forcefully makes the case for their return to Greece. Drawing on the artistic, moral, legal and political perspectives of the argument, Hitchens's eloquent prose makes The Elgin Marbles an invaluable contribution to one of the most important cultural controversies of our times.

Andrew said...

In spite of your clear short history, for once I do not have an opinion either way.

hels said...

Amazon
thank you for the Hitchens reference which I read 30 years ago. I didn't always like his politics, but he wrote history very well, including The Elgin Marbles - which he concluded should be returned.

hels said...

Andrew,
many people outside UK and Greece would agree with you. I would say that on moral grounds, Greece is in the right. On legal grounds, there is no right side... yet.

DUTA said...

The marbles should definitely be returned to Greece. Art is not a global storage affair; it should belong to where it has been created. Wherever the original owner is known, the works should be returned.

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, I remember the awe I felt when I encountered the Elgin gallery in the British Museum. I do not feel that art needs to be returned if it was not considered stolen or plundered at the moment it left the country. By the way, have you seen the notices for the upcoming Sotheby's sale for Ilse Hesselberger's (1888-1941--note the sad, tell-tale death date) Bronzino? It was commandeered by the Nazi's but restituted to Ilse's heirs, who are now selling it for charity. (A more frivolous lesson here if you look at the painting's history is that we all should have been buying Old Masters in 1927!):
https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2023/master-paintings-sculpture-part-i/portrait-of-a-young-man-with-a-quill-and-a-sheet?locale=en

--Jim

Hels said...

DUTA

It is an important subject, yes. Art does not necessarily belong wherever it was originally created.. otherwise every single Italian painting around the world would be sent back to Italy and every single piece of porcelain art would be sent back to China.

If, however, the objects were stolen, given away without proper consent or bartered under pressure, then the courts must find the true legal owners and negotiate with both nations with dignity.

Even after WW2 was over, the restitution, repatriation and return of cultural objects back to their legitimate owners is still taking time. But it is a model that other thefts may be able to be resolved.

Luiz Gomes said...

Boa noite de quarta-feira. Obrigado pela visita e comentário. Fico o imaginando as riquezas que terão que ser devolvidas ao Brasil. Na Dinamarca tem um fóssil de uma preguiça gigante que foi levada no século XIX.

Hels said...

Parnassus

Welcome home :)

Portrait of a Young Man with a Quill and Sheet of Paper is a perfect example of the issues being discussed. The courts had to find: the sales documentation from 1927, who took the painting from Ilse Hesselberger? was the Bronzino paid for (even at a ridiculously low amount)? what if no child or grandchild survived the Holocaust?

I am glad it only took from 1941 until 2022 *deep irony* for the painting to be returned to the family, out of the Berlin building used by the German Parliamentary Society! It will take much longer for the Elgin Marbles.

Hels said...

Luiz

it seems inevitable that every New World country that was colonialised by the Great Powers in earlier centuries, lost many of its treasures. Before the riches can be returned to Brazil etc, there has to be both the good will and the legal processes to gather the evidence and to guarantee the return. Not easily done, as we have all seen.

Sue Bursztynski said...

There was an irony that the treasures of Troy, taken back to Berlin by Schliemann, were looted by Russians after WWII, and now both Germany and Turkey want them back!

I do think the Elgin Marbles should be returned now. They are wanted back where they belong and there really is no excuse to keep them any more.

Hels said...

Sue

If returning the Elgin Marbles to Athens seems impossible, returning the Treasures of Troy to Turkey is mega impossible. The German government knows that their German archaeologist "discovered" the cultural treasure in 1873 and therefore they rightfully own the items "stolen" by the Soviet Union in WW2. Russia knew the Nazi troops looted or destroyed thousands of art treasures in the Soviet Union, so the Treasures of Troy goes some way to pay for Russian losses. Neither case makes sense.

Daniel Cassady said...

A scathing public letter signed by the Guatemalan Collective for the Defense of Heritage claims a Mayan throne was illegally exported to New York’s Museum of Metropolitan Art against the will of “Indigenous organizations, institutions and archeologists.” The work, titled Throne I, was sent to the Met for restoration, after which it went on view for the museum’s exhibition Lives of the Gods: Divinity in Maya Art. Guatemalan officials granted a “rare temporary export authorization” for the eight-century throne and a similarly dated panel as part of a “reciprocal loan agreement” with the museum. “We are vigilant of the actions of the corrupt rulers, of the excesses they carry out, who twist the laws when they see fit and apply them severely against individual and collective human rights defenders in this country,” the letter reads. The letter calls for both artifacts to be returned and placed in a “special protected place” in Guatemala’s National Museum of Archeology and Ethnology.

A Metropolitan Museum of Art spokesperson told ARTNews. “We have been very honored to work with conservators, archaeologists, and Maya community members from Guatemala over the past several years on this project. These loans were approved by various governing bodies in recognition of the importance of the project’s research contributions.”

ARTnews

Hels said...

Daniel

Thank you. Although this is a totally different case, two things stand out as being particularly important:
1. Indigenous organisations, institutions and archaeologists are the focus of the debate, and
2. The owners referred to actions of the corrupt rulers, of the excesses they carry out, who twisted the laws when they wanted. I assume if the corrupt rulers applied themselves against collective human rights defenders in the country of origin, they did so many centuries ago.

mem said...

I changed my mind about this when I actually saw them in London where they were beautifully exhibited and given that they actually belong to the world and human civilization , I think they need to stay where they are . If they had stayed in Greece they wouldn't exist anymore . I understand that the Turks used the Parthenon as an ammunition storage and that bits of stone from the Parthenon, were being used by peasants to build their homes. I don't know this for sure but have read this . I accept that this may be propaganda .London is a world city with people coming from everywhere so I think its a wonderful thing to have these objects and many other things from around the world displayed there so we can all get a sense of our human history . The only thing I don't approve of are the human skulls which were collected in the 19 th century to demonstrate that certain races were inferior to other according head \ skull shape .

Hels said...

mem

You have come to the same conclusions as successive British govern­­ments came to, ever since the late 19th century:
1.the marbles are more accessible to people from all over the world, if they are in the British Mus­eum;
2.their return to Greece would be an unstoppable pre­­­c­edent that the British (and other host nations) could bitterly reg­ret later;
3.the Acropolis of Athens could never offer the same secur­ity that London offers.

However correct these three points are, they don't make the original owners feel any better.