endless queuing at the Degenerate Art Exhibition,
Munich 1937
Remembering Exhibitions may be found in other historical displays. This device can convey a broader sense of the period than that provided by the art works alone. But since the 'remembering exhibition' is distant in time from the original exhibition, the art often needs to be supplemented by archival documentation. We can jog modern viewers’ memories by displaying photographs and documents relating to the show’s reception.
For me there have been many landmark shows, but none as powerful as the Entartete Kunst/Degenerate Art exhibition which started in Munich in 1937 and wandered around German and Austrian cities for 4 years. I have written and lectured about it at length.
So of all the examples that Reesa Greenberg used, I am currently interested in two. The first was the 1937 Entartete Kunst/Degenerate Art exhibition, remembered in curator Stephanie Barron’s 1991 Degenerate Art: The Fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany. Assembled by the Los Angeles County Museum, 150 art objects from the original German exhibition were included.
The reconstruction was not entirely faithful to the original exhibition. In 1937 the original Entartete Kunst exhibition was shown in a number of very different warehouse spaces; these changed as the show travelled around Germany and Austria. By contrast, the 1991 reconstruction of Degenerate Art consisted of a free-standing corridor with a raised floor in the middle of an exhibition gallery. The effect of this structure was that of entering a time tunnel. Only some of the reproduced art works were positioned in a crowded manner similar to the way they had been encountered in 1937. It was intended to convey something of the intensity of the experience of the original Nazi exhibition.
The second, more fascinating modern exhibition was the 1997 Exiles and Emigrés: The Flight of European Artists from Hitler which featured a replica space based on Frederic Kiesler’s Art of this Century Gallery in New York. It was originally designed in 1942 for Peggy Guggenheim.
Barron and her German associate, Sabine Eckmann, vividly illustrated a nearly forgotten aspect of the late 1930s: the American public was largely unaware of Nazi persecution and in any case, mainstream America had little sympathy for the people the Nazis persecuted, especially those weird abstract artists. People who appreciated and supported the creative talent of the avant-garde were few indeed. The 1997 exhibition recognised some of the most prominent ones, such as Peggy Guggenheim, Alfred Barr and Reinhold Niebuhr. Notably missing, however, were the contributions of the American Friends Service Committee, whose Friendship House became a gathering place for refugee artists. They succeeded in convincing the sponsors of the 1939 New York World's Fair to include an exhibit of art banned by the Nazis!
Could the hysteria of the 1937 Degenerate Art exhibition be relived 60 years later, knowing that many of the artists identified as degenerate had to flee into exile or face the Nazi regime? Could we imagine ourselves standing for hours in long long queues, waiting to see the modernist art, before it was sold off or destroyed?
Probably not, but we moderns could develop insight into why the Nazi party was so offended by the degenerate artists and their work. And we can at last unwrap the irony of Nazi taste setters displaying the very art that they wanted desperately to hide from the public. The 1937 Entartete Kunst exhibition was to give, at the outset of a new age for German people, a close survey of the gruesome last chapter of those decades of cultural decadence that preceded the Great Change.
Stephanie Barron, Susan L Caroselli et al wrote Degenerate Art : the fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany, published by Abrams and Los Angeles County Museum of Art in 1991. It is well worth reading. So is Exiles + Emigrés : the Flight of European Artists from Hitler, written by Stephanie Barron, Sabine Eckmann and Matthew Affron. Published by H.N. Abrams in 1997, the book could have been a text for my lectures - Varian Fry, Bauhaus architecture, Marc Chagall, Surrealism in exile etc.
Until mid May 2025, the Musée Picasso in Paris has an exhibition entitled "Degenerate Art: The Trial of Modern Art under Nazism". This is a dark dive into art history, exploring the Nazi regime's persecution of the avant-garde. Based on an analysis of the Entartete Kunst exhibition held in Munich in 1937, see 600+ works by 100 modern artists, including Otto Dix, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Vassily Kandinsky, Emil Nolde, Paul Klee and Max Beckmann, in a setting designed to provoke visitors' disgust.
works intentionally displayed badly,
Degenerate Art Exhibition, 1937
Fate of the Avant Garde in Nazi Germany Exhibition,
1991
The second, more fascinating modern exhibition was the 1997 Exiles and Emigrés: The Flight of European Artists from Hitler which featured a replica space based on Frederic Kiesler’s Art of this Century Gallery in New York. It was originally designed in 1942 for Peggy Guggenheim.
Barron and her German associate, Sabine Eckmann, vividly illustrated a nearly forgotten aspect of the late 1930s: the American public was largely unaware of Nazi persecution and in any case, mainstream America had little sympathy for the people the Nazis persecuted, especially those weird abstract artists. People who appreciated and supported the creative talent of the avant-garde were few indeed. The 1997 exhibition recognised some of the most prominent ones, such as Peggy Guggenheim, Alfred Barr and Reinhold Niebuhr. Notably missing, however, were the contributions of the American Friends Service Committee, whose Friendship House became a gathering place for refugee artists. They succeeded in convincing the sponsors of the 1939 New York World's Fair to include an exhibit of art banned by the Nazis!
Exiles and Emigres Exhibition,
1997
Could the hysteria of the 1937 Degenerate Art exhibition be relived 60 years later, knowing that many of the artists identified as degenerate had to flee into exile or face the Nazi regime? Could we imagine ourselves standing for hours in long long queues, waiting to see the modernist art, before it was sold off or destroyed?
Probably not, but we moderns could develop insight into why the Nazi party was so offended by the degenerate artists and their work. And we can at last unwrap the irony of Nazi taste setters displaying the very art that they wanted desperately to hide from the public. The 1937 Entartete Kunst exhibition was to give, at the outset of a new age for German people, a close survey of the gruesome last chapter of those decades of cultural decadence that preceded the Great Change.
Stephanie Barron, Susan L Caroselli et al wrote Degenerate Art : the fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany, published by Abrams and Los Angeles County Museum of Art in 1991. It is well worth reading. So is Exiles + Emigrés : the Flight of European Artists from Hitler, written by Stephanie Barron, Sabine Eckmann and Matthew Affron. Published by H.N. Abrams in 1997, the book could have been a text for my lectures - Varian Fry, Bauhaus architecture, Marc Chagall, Surrealism in exile etc.
Degenerate Art Exhibition, Musée Picasso Paris, 2025
sortiraparis.com
40 comments:
What an interesting piece. I had known of the Nazi's degenerate art exhibitions and wondered if it was merely a reaction to the explosion of german expression at the turn of the 20th century. What Robert Hughes called "the shock of the new" - e.g. Lovis Corinth, Liebermann. But knowing some of the persecution of these artists, we can appreciate the horror the society went through.
The concept of the "Remembering Exhibition," as articulated by Reesa Greenberg, highlights how exhibitions are not just isolated events but pivotal markers in art history
This was all new to me and I found it very interesting, thank you
Extremely interesting article,
how far the Nazis had come.
How much more will we learn and be shocked?
Unfortunately, however, people forget what fascism...
Thank you for citing "Degenerate Art : the fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany". To see the text and images, go to
https://www.lacma.org/sites/default/files/reading_room/New%20PDF%20from%20Images%20Output-10compressed5.pdf
Good to learn more, Hels.
Dear Helen, I like visiting exhibitions! So I read your post with interest.
It's quite amazing that so many paintings could be saved ! Must have been very brave people who saved the pictures.
Liam
the Nazi reaction to German Expressionism was extraordinary. Had they truly disliked a few paintings from the Weimar Era, I might have understood them censoring an ugly sex scene, for example. But they tried to eliminate the entire Weiman Era: the avant-garde in music, art, film and architecture, giving to the world Otto Dix, Ernst Kirchner, Arnold Schoenberg, Kurt Weill and Fritz Lang etc (see 31/12/2008) . And not just by actively disliking those art objects.
roentare
if the Nazis wanted the so-called degenerate books and works of art to disappear forever with noone noticing, why did they make the book fires so public and degenerate art displays so unmissable?
However I really did understand why, when art loving Nazis took these beautiful paintings from the artists' studios and galleries, they put them quietly away in their own collections.
Thanks to Greenberg, I agree with you about pivotal markers in art history. But
Jo-Anne
I knew all about the Degenerate Art Exhibition, held in Munich in 1937.
But I knew nothing at all about the Degenerate Art exhibition that was arranged by the Los Angeles County Museum in 1991. So you will enjoy "Degenerate Art : the fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany".
https://www.lacma.org/sites/default/files/reading_room/New%20PDF%20from%20Images%20Output-10compressed5.pdf
Katerina
I am not sure that Fascism has been forgotten in politics, trade, taxation and the military. But it has slipped out of our view recently in the arts, literature, sexual preferences, sport and even medicine. Universities will the next target of Fascist rulers.
Thank you for the reference. I hope every reader can take the time to read your paper.
Margaret
I thought WW1 might have had a lot to do with Nazi disappointment with German artists (and others) but Otto Dix earned the Iron Cross as a soldier in WW1!!! Yet his glorious 1920s art works were not considered patriotic enough. War Cripples was included in the Munich exhibition and was later destroyed.
Ingrid
It is very difficult to know. Vanity Fair reported that there were c650,000 works looted from Europe by the Nazis, many never recovered. But 10 years ago they reported that German authorities had found a trove of 1,280 paintings, drawings, and prints worth a billion dollars in a Munich flat with a brave old lady. Perhaps more will come to light.
Irina
me too. I enjoyed Impressionist works and saw many in Paris exhibitions etc.
However I found Expressionist art more exciting and was delighted when there was a (rare) exhibition to visit.
I hope that there would never be degenerate art exhibits again, because the word degenerate is such a strong word with such a negative impact. But scary that there are many people here int he US that would call people degenerates because of other reasons like their sexual choices. I just read Ingred's comment above, and it's interesting how many pieces have been saved and even more so, how many have not yet been found. Have a great rest of your weekend Hels.
Bom dia. Acho um pouco estranho esse nome dessa exposição. Sobre a sua pergunta, a Estação de Trem, foi demolida.
Thank you, Helen, again I learned a lot! Dark times that have been.
I've heard that more people in 1930's degenerate art shows had more people attend them. Then other art shows of that time.
Since Trump got involved with the Kennedy art center. I have wonder if he is going to have his own version degenerate art. I know he toss out drag shows.
Erika
a degenerate is an immoral or corrupt person, iniquitous, nefarious, vicious, criminal and villainous. The Nazis could have easily called the artists too untalented or too modern, but no... they chose to call them corrupt and villainous. How disgusting.
Werk ohne Autor, in English: Never Look Away, is a delightful German movie that opens with one of these scoldings. In my younger days, mass newsmags and christian teevee corporations alternated between belittling and berating youths with better things to do than kill for Nixon National Socialism or practice prayer and abstinence. Today, reflecting on the movie, one struggles not to recall the late sixties as the first act in an actual replay of the Third Reich.
A _bit_ strange? I would say allocate the nastiness to the people who made the term to popular eg "Expressionist art and artists destroyed by the Nazis".
Britta
I imagine World War One, the Great Depression and the end of Weimar Democracy in 1933 were dark times for everyone, yes. But I always think of architecture, literature, art, science and universities _raise a nation_ morally and culturally, not _lead the nation to depravity_.
peppylady
The Degenerate Art exhibition started in Munich in 1937 and then around German and Austrian cities for 4 years, attracting enormous crowds. Was this because the crowds believed it would be their only chance to see the amazing Expressionist artists' work. Or if they were pro-Nazi crowds who wanted to hiss at the degeneracy.
I am gobsmacked :( When Pres Donald Trump announced that he was taking control of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, he described the move as a triumph over wokey programming. He subsequently fired the 17 board members appointed by Pres Joe Biden and installed himself as chairman. I never thought I would say this but thank goodness the Kennedy Centre finally opened in 1971 largely from private funding and patronage.
Hank
Thanks for the reference. Here is the summary by IMDb:
Young German artist Kurt Barnert (Tom Schilling) escaped East Germany and fled to West Germany but continued to be tormented by the experiences of his childhood and youth in the Nazi years and during the GDR-regime. When he met student Ellie (Paula Beer), he was convinced that he had met the love of his life and started to create paintings that mirrored not only his own fate, but also the traumas of an entire generation.
The first exhibition in Australia showing the avant-garde art movements that emerged in Germany was "The Mad Square: Modernity in German Art 1910–37", a collection of paintings, photos, films, sculptures and decorative arts with loans from museums and private collections outside Australia.
I liked seeing the modern art works presenting the artists’ interaction with the modernity, city-life, culture and politics. But although I knew Max Beckmann, Otto Dix, George Grosz, Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Käthe Kollwitz and László Moholy-Nagy, I had never heard of the others. Never mind.. the exhibition took its title from Felix Nussbaum’s 1931 painting The Mad Square which depicted modern Berlin as lunatic.
A fascinating post of which I was ignorant. You are a great educator.
Joe
I am very pleased that the NGV and other Australian galleries displayed the 2011 exhibition "The Mad Square: Modernity in German Art 1910–37", but it took a _very_ long time for Australia to enable this serious analysis.
The curator knew it was exciting to see some of the actual works that were ridiculed. But she wanted it to begin with WWI, a time when German culture was on the ascendant with artists like Kirchner. The war was followed by the terrible pain of its reality, and a search for the fitting visual language .
Fun60
Thank you.
When I retired from the academic world, I thought that would be the end of research, writing, reading and sharing quality historical material. Then I accidentally found the blogging world, with some truly excellent blog posts that regenerated a commitment in my own ageing mind :)
SocialLinksHub
many thanks for reading the post. But no advertising please.
Boa tarde e bom domingo. Um excelente início de semana. A maldade do passado, serve de exemplo para não repetir nem no presente e nem no futuro.
Luiz
I agree totally.
Read "The Fear Of Art: Contemporary Art Censorship".
19th and 20th centuries arts were recently deemed offensive by museums and removed from display. eg Manchester Art Gallery removed John William Waterhouse’s painting Hylas and the Nymphs (1896); and Egon Schiele’s centennial exhibition advertisements were censored in London and Germany.
But I think It was understandable that they hated this modern art because so much of it is about ideas and perception not concrete things like images of trees or landscapes. That made it dangerous to a regime that wanted no questioning of their agenda .
mem
The paintings the senior Nazis were not all landscape-based. They loved portraits of soldiers, perfect Aryan families, ceremonial events, marches, flags, eagles etc. One example was the much loved painting "Coming Home from the Eastern Front,” by Austrian artist Rudolf Hermann Eisenmenger.
This exploration of how exhibitions are remembered is thought-provoking and highlights an important layer of how we engage with art historically. The idea of a 'remembering exhibition' offers a compelling bridge between past and present, especially when original contexts are lost. It’s fascinating to consider how replicas and archival materials work together to revive moments that shaped artistic discourse. I shared a new post; you are invited to read: https://www.melodyjacob.com/2025/04/amazing-guidingcross-hoodie-testimony-faith-hope.html Thank you.
Interesting to learn about the concept Remembering Exhibitions. There have been so many incredibly important ones over time.
Melody
"especially when the original contexts are lost", nod. We are lucky to remember one generation earlier, and even that depended on how much our parents liked to talk about their experiences. Ditto archival material.. if it still survived.
Handmade
Agreed...remembering exhibitions are essential in all nations. But most nations have had very ugly periods in their histories and the exhibition curators would have to be very cautious. Imagine, for example, Australia hiding the stolen generation of aboriginal children.
Post a Comment