20 July 2024

King James VI ridding Scotland of witches.

The evidence. 
A witch kissed the arse of the Devil

Witch-hunting
plagued Europe, as soon as the idea that witches worshipped the devil took hold. Read an excellent book, Scottish Witches and Witch-Hunters by Julian Goodare ed, 2013. In Scotland, this was common by the late 1500s. Locals talked about Satan’s ability to raise storms, kill livestock and spread deadly illness. Satan tried to undermine human society from within and was recruiting se­cret agents i.e witches to do his bidding. So Satan’s agents had to be eradicated, for the sake of the kingdom.

Scotland was not alone in falling victim to witchcraft panics; Bur­g­undy, Italy, Switzerland, Germany and Scandinavia all endured out­breaks of witch panic. Burning witches alive was common in Ger­many and other parts of Europe in the late C16th and the early C17th. Note in Scotland the convicted were usually strangled first.

After the Reformation split Europe into Protestant and Catholic in the C16th, both sides worried about witches. But during this period of religious reform, Protestant rulers were most com­m­itted. Witch-hunting was virtually an ext­ension of the Protestant Reformat­ion as parish ministers and government authorities sought to create a “godly state” in which everyone worshipped correctly; sin was wiped out; and disorder prevented.

Scot­land’s witch hunts were frequent. From 1590, intense pan­ics erupted in Scotland: 1590-91, 1597, 1628-1631, 1649-1650 and 1661-62. As a result, c2,500 accused witches out of a popul­at­ion of a million people were executed, mostly wom­en - 5 times the average European execution rate!

Scottish Parliament criminalised witchcraft in 1563, just be­f­ore King James VI's birth. Nearly 30 years passed before the first major witchcraft panic arose in 1590, when King James and his Danish Queen were personally targeted by wit­ches. These enemies conjured dangerous storms to try to kill the royals during their North Sea voyages.

One of the first accused in this panic was Geillis Dun­can, from Tranent in East Lothian. In the late 1590 her employer accused her and tortured her into a confession in which she named several acc­om­plices. Duncan later retracted her confession, but by then the panic was well under way.

So Scotland’s widespread panics over witches was largely determined by the role of King James VI. He sanctioned witch trials after an alarming confession in 1591 from an accused witch, Agnes Sampson, revealing that 200 wit­ch­es heard the devil preach to them, to plot the king’s ruination. 
  
Torture of the women identified as witches. 
Supervised by King James VI of Scotland

The trial, at Berwick

Capital punishment, by fire
Image credits: History of Scotland

Many witches were put to death. During the North Berwick trials (1590) alone, 100+ people were implicated. The Scottish king pers­onally supervised the torture of witches, whenever he could. 

Six years later another panic broke out. Again witches were reported to be conspiring against King James personally. A woman named Margaret Aitken, Great Witch of Balwearie, claimed a special power to detect other witches, many of whom were put to death on her word alone. This panic halted abruptly when Aitken was exposed as a fraud. This incident embarrassed witch-hunters great­ly, so partly to justify the recent trials, King James published his intellectual treatise, Daemonologie in 1597.

Daemonol­ogie explained how Satan operated in the world. He was the leader of fallen angels who became demons. These dem­ons made pacts with people and granted them powers to work harmful magic. Thus witchcraft was a secret conspiracy between humans and demons, and against this conspir­acy, true Christians’ only hope was to appeal to God.

Consider the wit­ches in Shakespeare’s tragedy Macbeth. First performed in 1606, the play was a compliment to the newly crowned King James I and his book Daemonol­ogie.

After the death of Queen Elizabeth I in 1603, King James VI inher­ited her throne and moved south to London as King James I of Eng­land. There was a new religious opponent: militant Catholics. Cath­olic conspiracies threatened his claim on the English throne, in much the same way the North Berwick witches had threatened him in Scotland. After the Gunpowder Plot of 1605Guy Fawkes’ plan to blow up Parliament and kill the king, James turned away from hunt­ing witches in favour of rooting out Catholic conspiracies. 

Even though King James’s attentions shifted, witch­craft fear had already permeated Scottish society, and witch-hunting took place in areas near the centres of state power eg Fife and Lothian. And fear of the devil was at its peak when the state was determined to enforce religious uniformity. 

King James' book Daemonologie, in 1597

Most practical measures to weed out witches were taken by the local leaders of Scottish society, the lairds/local aristocrats and min­is­ters. They formed kirk sessions/parish committees to super­vise the people and to bring them to godliness. Kirk sessions were not criminal courts, but they could arrest and interrogate suspects and pass cases on to the secular authorities. Especially extra­marital sex cases!

The main type of an accused witch was an elderly, crabby female – a woman who irritated her neigh­bours. But once the in­it­ial suspect was tortured to name accomplices, they too could be accused of hav­ing made a pact with the devil. Remember that 85% of the convict­ed witches were wom­en.

Sleep deprivation was the most common method of torture. After 3 days without sleep, the suspect would lose the ability to resist the questioners, and would also start to hallucinate, giving very strange con­fessions. These were not sober accounts of real activ­ities; they were fantasies from terrified women, desperately trying to satisfy their interrogators.

In the late C17th religious pluralism became more acceptable. New scientific ideas undermined the dogmatic certainty about witch­craft. Courts refused to accept confessions that might have been extorted by torture. Witch-hunting became less vital to the state, and there were no more national panics after 1662.

In the small fishing town of Pittenweem in 1704, an event illust­rated what happened when the locals feared witches, but the author­it­ies would no longer ex­ecute them. Four of the women confessed to witch­craft, then retracted their con­fessions. The central auth­or­it­ies in Edinburgh forbade a trial, and the suspects had to be rel­eased. For all the horror of mob justice, the Pittenweem case was among Scotland’s last witch panics.

In 1736, Britain's Parl­iament repealed the old (1563) witchcraft stat­ute. Since then small monuments have been erected in Scotland to witch panic victims, 400 years ago.





30 comments:

roentare said...

Witches are probably just trained herbalists contrary to the mainstream medicine. Such a tragic treatment of people around these times

Andrew said...

My parents had an odd friendship that didn't last with a Jehovah Witness couple who believed in witches and the couple used to scare us with their warnings. Eventually the couple became so absurd, my parents gave up on them. This was in the 1960s, so the fear was still there then and taken seriously.

History Extra said...

Why was King James VI obsessed with witch hunts? The witch hunts that swept across Europe between 1450 and 1750 are one of the most controversial and terrifying phenomena in history, resulting in the trial of around 100,000 people (mostly women), a little under half of whom were put to death. Tracy Borman explores the most notorious royal witch-hunter of all time: James VI

History Extra
Tracy Borman Published: April 9, 2024

Margaret D said...

I don't understand totally the thinking way back of why people were so afraid of witches. Mind did work overtime way back then.

River said...

Most instances of witchcraft were simply nature doing her thing and the people not understanding, so any woman who understood and followed natures rules was considered a witch.
Too many were taught to "fear the witch" when they should have been fearing those who persecuted and killed.

Hels said...

roentare

your timing is perfect. In 2020 a book called 'Witch's Herbal Apothecary: Rituals & Recipes for a Year of Earth Magick and Sacred Medicine Making' was published. It is a guide of recipes, rituals, and lore that enable readers to tap into Earth Magick to heal themselves. There is one big difference - modern readers of this book will presumably not be treated brutally.

Hels said...

Andrew

I know there are still women who call themselves witches eg Wiccans avoid evil and any appearance of it. They want live a peaceful, tolerant and balanced life in tune with nature.
Their incantations come from their Book of Shadows, a modern 'prayer book' of wisdom and witchcraft.

But when your parents' friends were becoming truly absurd in the 1960s, they didn't sound as if they had ever been in touch with modern, healing witchcraft. They sounded more cult-like.

Hels said...

History Extra

thank you for an excellent reference. Hopefully readers will find and keep the article.

I just want to question one point: whether King James I really was the most notorious witch-hunter of all time. We might expect Lutheran and Calvinist countries like Germany and Switzerland to be the worst, given that Catholic countries were expending all their energy in defeating the Reformation. King James seemed fairly tolerant in terms of religious faith.

Hels said...

Margaret

White royal families and governments seemed to support and win the love of their majority populations by oppressing, expelling or executing their scary minorities - Blacks, Jews, Asians, gay communities, gypsies, people with mental or physical disabilities. The problem with executing witches was the difficulty in detecting them in the first place. Thus the witch hunters had to rely on physical signs (eg hidden warts) or listening to neighbours' gossip.

Hels said...

River

there had been witches in Europe during the mid-late 15th century, but the real hysteria wasn't launched until the Reformation got going in the early 16th century. So the Church and the Royals had to write, read and educate the population in sermons about the horrors that witches created.

Ordinary civilians working against the judges, torturers and executors of witches was never going to work. Even good people could be tortured and gaoled, if they didn't cooperate with the witch hunters.

Ирина Полещенко said...

I feel very sorry for the women who were accused of witchcraft. Basically, they were herbalists who helped people by treating them with herbs.
Any person whom someone does not like for some reason can be accused of witchcraft. Dear Helen, you and I too could have been accused of witchcraft if we had lived at that time.

In the Middle Ages in Europe, the Holy Inquisition killed a lot of women. There has never been a witch hunt in Russia. Our Orthodox Church has never hunted witches or conducted crusades in the name of our Lord.

jabblog said...

This was very interesting to read, though I was familiar with much of it. I always enjoy reading others' comments.

Hels said...

Irina

I am glad to hear from you, even though the post was dealing largely with King James I. I believe there were witchcraft trials in Russia but there were important differences from the trials in Western and Central Europe i.e Russian trials mainly focused on males.

Russia had its own version of religious disturbances in the mid 17th century when the Church was reformed, but not everybody wanted to give up on the old Orthodox traditions. They were persecuted by authorities and many fled to the frontier areas to the north and the east. Was this because the Protestant Reformation was not exactly as experienced elsewhere?

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

An interesting post, I find it amazing how once there were these witch hunts and so many of convinced there were evil witches around. If someone was different or a bit odd with what we would now consider a mental health condition, they would be labeled a witch and arrested, tortured and murdered, just for being different.

hels said...

jabblog

I could understand why religious authorities were threatened by what they saw as a heresy, but I never understood what King James was so desperate about.

hels said...

Jo-Anne
I would have thought that a wobbly old lady on a walking stick with imperfect language skills would be the least threatening person in the nation. Clearly it wasn't so.

diane b said...

You dig up some gruesome stories. Past beliefs are scary and unfathomable but maybe grew out of ignorance. The pisc are interesting. They look like linocuts.

Hels said...

diane

Linocuts weren't invented until the late 19th century, so based on the Obscene Kiss being described as a wood engraving, I am guessing/hoping the others might be also.

Historic UK reported that James VI was travelling to Denmark to collect his new bride Anne of Denmark in 1589. During the crossing, the storms were so severe that he was forced to turn back. James became convinced that this was the work of North Berwick witches, intent on regicide. One of them had sailed into the Firth of Forth to summon the storm, thus proving her guilt as a witch who deserved horrendous torture.

mem said...

you really have to wonder about King James sanity . It sounds to me like he may have been aa just a little Paranoid . Thank god we don't have absolute rulers in most parts of the world any more . One interesting thing that coincided with this upswing in hysteria was the invention of the printing press . Information ?disinformation and misinformation was more easily spread and people who may have never bothered thinking about witches or other "different " people were confronted with this idea . They probably hadn't had to develop critical reasoning and thinking because they didn't have to deal with much information except what was very local and pertaining to their own lives . People have to develop thinking skills in order to deal with information as we are seeing world wide at the moment

Hels said...

mem

even if King James was the most paranoid person in the entire nation, and powerful rulers often had good reason to fear regicide by their own sons and brothers or military enemies, why blame witches/elderly ladies? Actually the king achieved so much (sexual?) pleasure participating HANDS ON in the witch trials and in the women's murders, those thrills seem like his most important motivation rather than averting regicide.

This was even more bizarre when King James focused for the rest of his reign on settling bitter fights over reforms in the Church of England. King James had to spend endless energy, money and allegiances; he had to reinforce his image as a devout political and spiritual leader. Consider how he approved THE new translation of the Bible in in 1604.

thelma said...

One of the things older women were called witches is fundamentally because of their old age, they had entered the menstrual part of their lives and were seen as useless. It follows that the womb of a woman belonged to child birth and the church, the seed belonged to the church, I am only repeating what I heard yesterday by the way. And another thought the horrible medieval Sheela Na Gig statues on the outside of churches are mostly female. Religion and superstition go hand in hand.
You have only to look at the remaining painted walls of old churches to see that fear was the controlling force of the church.
Monks also practised herbalism but were not persecuted for growing healing plants.

Hels said...

thelma

Who commissioned the squat, naked, cackling women who were pulling open their enlarged labia? If the sheela na gigs were used by the church to ridicule wombs, labia, foetuses, menstruation and fertility, then no wonder women were seen as fearsome heretics.

Fear was definitely the controlling force of almost all religions. My despair was that the fear was directed against a particularly vulnerable sector of the community :(

thelma said...

Hels, The Sheela na gigs have many explanations for their existence, reaching back to Pagan times and the so called Cailleach or the 'hag' and the few that are in England are but reminders of the 'mouth of hell' if caught in sin. You have written a fascinating article, thank you.

Luiz Gomes said...

Bom dia, uma excelente segunda-feira e uma ótima semana. Obrigado pelo conhecimento e aula de história. Parabéns pelo seu trabalho de pesquisa.

Hels said...

thelma

Many thanks...I must do some reading. The Sheela na gigs from pagan times seem to have been something of a precedent for identifying women as evil witches centuries later.

Hels said...

Luiz

my knowledge of history is deep but not broad. Fortunately I did years of history of European nations and their distant empires, Asian China and Russia, and the Middle East. But nothing before 1066. I am embarrassed to admit that I had to find out when the pagan times were.

Hank Phillips said...

Thanks so much for this post. Like Nixey's "The Darkening Age," it sheds an amazing amount of light on the current mania for girl-bullying, Comstockism, Beatles-albums burning, witch burning and War on Everything.

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, The nerve of those witches invading Scotland and other places (including Colonial New England) and causing all that trouble! Of the people who feared and prosecuted witches, I wonder how many of them truly and thinkingly believed that these people practiced actual witchcraft and harmed society, and how many were using the accusations to their own advantage, or to create mob reactions. My guess is that real witch-believers were relatively few. However, nothing has changed in the present day, except the word "witch" just isn't used any more*--luckily, there are lots of replacements.
--Jim
*Although it hasn't entirely died out. People repeatedly try to ban The Wizard of Oz and other films and literature because they contain or mention witches (even good ones), and do you remember that brouhaha a while ago about the Proctor and Gamble moon-and-stars logo that people claimed represented devil worship?
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/procter-gamble-satan-conspiracy-theory

--Jim

Hels said...

Hank

I am not at all surprised there were minority groups in most generations who found themselves formally or informally oppressed. Is it inevitable in future generations? Is it true for most nations?

Hels said...

Parnassus

I also wonder how many ordinary people truly believed that the accused practised actual witchcraft and harmed society. But your other explanation does not seem as probable - other ordinary people were probably not using the accusations to their own advantage. Rather they were terrified that, if they didn't cooperate with King James' witch hunters, they would be immediately accused of being witches themselves, actively involved in the local secret coven.

Re The Wizard of Oz, apparently it really WAS banned in some U.S states. Pan Macmillan noted the book was banned in the 20th century for its strong female characters, use of magic, promotion of socialist values and attribution of human characteristics to animals. NB banned in the 20th century!