02 October 2021

How did the British mass murderer, Frederick Deeming, continue murdering in Melbourne?

Read a newsworthy Age article by Carolyn Webb called “Was he Jack the Ripper", reviewing a book on British serial killer Freder­ick Deeming (1853–92). Then I will pose my own questions and comments.

In 1892 while Deeming was awaiting sen­tence for kil­l­ing his second wife, he claimed that his dead mother was taunting him nightly in his Melbourne Gaol. It was she who’d urged him to kill people! Garry Linnell’s new book The Devil’s Work told how, in that era, even perfectly respectable members of society believed they comm­un­ic­ated with the dead. Deeming’s lawyer, future Aus­­tralian Prime Minister Al­fred Deakin, and Sidney Dickinson, an Am­erican journ­alist covering Deeming’s trial, both followed C19th spirit­ualism.

Deeming and his first wife, Marie James
photographed in Sydney mid 1880s. 
State Library Victoria

In Mar 1892 the discovery of the mutilated body of Deeming’s 2nd wife Emily Math­er, buried under a hearth in a Windsor house in Melbourne, escal­ated into an international tragedy. A journal­ist’s inquiries into Deeming’s British past then led to the discovery of the bod­ies of his 1st wife Marie James and 4 young child­ren (Bertha 10, Mary 7, Sidney 5, Leala 1). They were under a floor that had been conc­reted by Deeming 8 months before, in a Rainhill house he’d rented near Liverpool.

Deeming’s arrest came after detectives were drinking at Melbourne’s famous Young & Jackson Pub. They overheard a wine merchant talking about a strange man the merchant met on a steamer trip to Perth. The stranger’s name was Baron Swanston, a known alias of Deeming. Deeming was located in the rural WA town of Southern Cross, 370km east of Perth where he was waiting for his new fiancee, Kate Rounsefell, to arrive from Sydney.

Author Garry Linnell, a former Nine director of news and Fairfax editorial director, said there’s a strong chance Deeming was Jack the Ripper. Deeming was a globetrotter who could charm women, was known to visit brothels and to hate sex workers.

 Deeming's second wife, Emily Math­er

After Deeming’s arrest, a dressmaker told London news­pap­er The Globe she recognised Deeming from a photo as the man who she courted in Lon­don’s East End in 1888, before and after two of Ripper murders. She said the agitated man showed an intimate knowledge of the Ripper. He spoke of his travels abroad, and like Deeming, wore ostentatious rings.

Deeming was extradited to Victoria from Western Australia. In the Mel­b­ourne Gaol, Deeming revelled in his notoriety and boasted that no-one knew what he’d got away with. Linnell said Deeming clear­ly had a dist­ur­bed mind and was a very strange individual. But it was curious that Deeming ran into the spectre of his dead mother, just as he was seeking to be spared execution on the grounds of insan­ity.

He wasn’t spared! Deeming was tried at Melbourne Supreme Court in Apr 1892, convicted of Emily’s murder and hanged at Melbourne Gaol, 23rd May 1892.

**

AFTER publicity surrounding the discovery of Mather's body in Mel­b­our­ne, investigations back in Rainhill revealed his first family’s decomp­os­ing bodies; Marie Deeming and the four children were buried beneath his re-concreted kitchen floor. Their throats had been cut or stran­g­l­ed! The murder and burials had apparently occurred while Deeming aka Albert Williams was courting Mather, in July 1891. But why were the 5 bodies murdered near Liverpool not promptly found? I know Deeming com­­­­pl­ain­ed that his house’s drains were defective, and that his kitchen floor needed to be concreted over, but surely that would have rung al­arm bells in police headquarters looking for the family. And how did an Aus­t­ralian journal­ist’s inquiries into Deeming’s past lead to the dis­c­ov­ery of the bod­ies of his first wife Marie and child­ren back in the UK?

While still in Rainhill, Deeming began to court Emily Mather, and they married as Mr and Mrs Albert Williams in Sept 1891. Did the cleric or magistrate not ask him if he was still married to his first wife?? Af­t­er all, the first family went missing only two months before the second wedding.

Even if the British police didn’t know about the murders, they knew Deeming had more gaol and asylum sentences than any criminal. So how could he leave the UK? In Nov 1891, the Williams sailed to Australia in the SS Kaiser Wilhelm II, arriving in Melbourne in Dec 1891 and renting a home. Only in Mar 1892 was the smell of a rotting corpse in the house so strong that the police were called and Mather's body found.

At a Melbourne inquest on 8th Mar, they were told that a man of Mr Wil­liams' description had auctioned household goods in Jan 1892. He was staying at a city hotel, reg­is­tered in a another name. And Deeming had already sign­ed up to a Matrimonial Agency, wishing to meet another young lady for marriage!

Deeming's lovely Windsor house in Melbourne 
where his second wife Emily was killed in 1892.

Note Frederick Deeming’s rapid decision-making and actions:
1.He married Marie James near Liverpool in Feb 1881.
2. He hid in South Africa, Australia & UK throughout 1887-89.
3.He killed Marie and their 4 children in July 1891.
4.He married his second wife Emily Mather in UK, Sept 1891.
5.He brought Emily to Melbourne and killed her in Dec 1891.
6.He got engaged in Perth to Kate Rounsefell, Jan 1892.
7.He registered with a marriage agency in Jan 1892.
8.He was hanged in Melbourne March 1892.

As for Deeming being the real Jack the Ripper, he was just one of the many men who have been identified as the brutal East End killer of London women  And as Linnell noted, Deeming viciously stabbed his victims, but unlike the Ripper, he buried them.

Read The Life and Crimes of Frederick Bailey Deeming by John Godl for additional information.




 

18 comments:

I Love Melbourne said...

Thanks for inviting me to read this sad story. You mention that the British police knew Deeming had more jail and asylum sentences than any criminal in that country, but what sort of crimes had he committed?

Future Now said...

https://futurenow93.blogspot.com/

Hels said...

I love Melbourne

Frederick Deeming was charged with crimes that included theft, larceny, obtaining money under false pretences, diamond mine swindles, giving fake names on formal documents etc. He was tried each time and locked up each time, but I cannot find any early examples of major crimes like rape, murder, kidnapping.

Perhaps that is why when his first wife and children disappeared, the police did not stop him immediately remarrying and taking his second wife on a ship to Australia.

Hels said...

Future Now

welcome aboard this history and art history blog. Are you interested in any particularly parts of British and British Empire history?

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, Lots of murderers kill by stabbing, so that doesn't constitute much evidence for Deeming being Jack the Ripper, especially with their differing m.o.'s. I imagine that at some time all 19th century British murderers are associated with Jack the Ripper. Incidentally, if you are writing a book about the less famous Deeming, it won't hurt sales to start such speculations.
--Jim

DUTA said...

Killers, especially those of their spouses, come from all walks of life. We have in our prisons doctors, cops, lawyers etc.. This shatters our basic beliefs that education makes a better man, that hard childhood and shortage of money leads to crime. Every new case leaves us shocked. Man is a big enigma.

Anonymous said...

Rather an interesting case and not one I know about. Police incompetence at crime scene investigations remains today, such as the death discovery of our own Phoebe Handsjuk.

Hels said...

Parnassus

that is true! British... males.. knives... murdering women.... ipso facto Jack the Ripper. In any case, Deeming had a longggg criminal and psychiatric history whereas Jack the Ripper lasted only from April-August 1888.

Hels said...

DUTA

Most men who kill their partners usually hate only their partners, not every woman in the country.

So Deeming seemed weird. He may have hated women, especially sex workers, yet he visited brothels regularly. He certainly loathed his wives, yet he constantly sought to be engaged to new fiancees. And he planned his wives' murders and their burial spots way in advance.

Hels said...

Andrew

experienced murder police, unless they have a vested interest in a case, should not be incompetent. Thus we have to ask why would Australian police say Phoebe Handsjuk committed suicide by getting drunk and then suiciding in a narrow rubbish chute.. down 12 storeys?

When Deeming told the police his wife and 4 children left home, why did they not look for them? And how could Deeming have been allowed to marry again only 2 months after Mrs Deeming disappeared, if she was simply on holiday somewhere. Bigamy laws were very tough then.

Joseph said...

Godl suggested that Deeming was psychiatrically disturbed most of his life. Was it possible in 1892 to have an insanity defence in murder cases? Was there an appeal period before execution?

Luiz Gomes said...

Boa tarde. Confesso que nunca ouvi falar dessa história aqui no Brasil. Através do seu maravilhoso trabalho aprendo cada vez mais.

Hels said...

Joseph

Good question! Apparently Deeming was psychiatrically disturbed during childhood when he was regularly beaten to a pulp by his brutal father. But apparently when a sex worker gave him syphilis, the psychosis expanded and he dedicated himself to killing her and as many other women as he could.

Parliament passed the Criminal Lunatics Act 1800, allowing a criminal to be found not guilty by reason of insanity. He could be remanded in custody until granted a royal pardon. Was insanity considered in Deeming's trial?

Godl claimed that in the 4 weeks before Deeming's execution, appeals and petitions were made and dismissed all the way to the Privy Council.

Hels said...

Luiz

I originally thought this case was only relevant to Britain and its Empire. But many of the issues were relevant in all countries - police incompetence, protection of women, criminals' insanity, criminal record-keeping and distribution across the Empire, bigamy laws, capital punishment etc etc

Fun60 said...

A fascinating story. With limited means of communication in the 19th century I cannot see how information about criminals was shared within the police force of one country let alone shared with other countries.

Hels said...

Fun60

Good point. I knew of course that heavy police and court files were kept in one place, but I was hoping that at least important and succinct warnings could be sent by telegram.

The first international submarine cable connected UK with France in the 1850s, then connections were made with other European countries. By the mid 1860s a Telegraph Company made and supervised the trans-Atlantic telegraph cable. And they laid various cables connecting Britain with its colonies in India, the Far East and Australia etc by 1870.

mem said...

Yes I think that communication was a key issue in seeming incompetence . I had a distant relative who in the 1890s married 2 women in neighboring towns some years apart by using his second name on the marriage certificate the second time round. Divorce was very expensive and socially unacceptable and so the solution was to change you name and do what you wanted. When this was by mutual agreement and children were cared for one wonders what the problem was but I guess that was rarely the case. Usually the second wife had no idea and was left shocked and hurt when the crime was discovered.

Hels said...

mem

I agree that divorce was so expensive and socially unacceptable that a solution, after a broken marriage, was to change the name and remarry peacefully.

But it seems Deeming's real goal was to find another woman to marry and kill, as soon as possible after his first wife's murder. Then a third and fourth, presumably. But Deeming had used many fake names in the past, presumably not traceable until after he was hanged. And why kill his four children?