The Seattle Needle, 1962
Seattle locals had been talking about creating a civic centre not seen since the first Fair, the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition of 1909. And they looked at the last U.S Fairs held in 1939–40, in San Francisco and New York. But as the post-war world had changed (eg television, atomic energy, jet airplanes), were Fairs still relevant anywhere?
In 1950, talk of a World Fair continued in Seattle’s Chamber of Commerce. In 1955, the City Council backed the idea, and soon the State Legislature in Olympia set up an exploratory commission. Later Seattle voters passed a bond issue to fund a civic centre, and a management committee.
That a modern world’s Fair would be held in Seattle in 1962 sounded risky. Seattle’s Fair would have to leave the city with a cultural heart, major infrastructure, refurbished waterfront and new University facilities. The Fair would have to help boost major projects eg the completion of Interstate 5 via downtown and the bridge. It would have to bequeath Seattle Centre, permanent complex of theatres, pavilions, Pacific Science Centre, Coliseum, Centre House, Opera House, Monorail and open urban space. The famous Space Needle would be second only to the Eiffel Tower as a world’s Fair souvenir.
To create an important Fair, Seattle supporters channelled millions of investment dollars into the city’s future! The space race with the Soviet Union gave Century 21 its theme, but locals took the responsibility of 1] making the nation’s response to Communism and of 2] demonstrating America’s commitment to, and expertise in science and technology.
Seattle Fair heads hired consultants, got seed money from wealthy donors and recruited community leaders. Once Seattle got the nod, the Federal Government funded a science pavilion, and property was acquired where urban amenities already existed: old armoury, Memorial Stadium & Civic Auditorium. Alas most of a working-class Edwardian neighbourhood was bulldozed in a slum clearance.
While visiting Stuttgart, Germany in 1959, CEO Edward Carlson saw the potential of a Space Age tower as a symbol for the 1962 Fair. Seattle investors organised a Corporation, and Carlson played a major part in the transformation of the Federal Science Pavilion into the permanent Science Centre. President of the Fair was Joe Gandy, a Ford dealer who travelled the world to recruit exhibitors and was responsible for obtaining approval for the Fair from the Bureau of International Expositions in Paris, essential for getting foreign governments to take part.
Fair organisers wanted an architectural showcase. So they turned to NW modernist architect Paul Thiry, well schooled in World’s Fairs, who designed the site and the Coliseum. Running the fair daily was field commander Ewen Dingwall, assisted by a skilled PR person, Jay Rockey, who got good coverage across the globe eg Life magazine!
The Fair also had the support of Washington’s energetic Senators Warren G Magnuson and Henry Scoop Jackson, who ultimately got $10 million Federal funding for the Science Pavilion. Clearly the push for more science apparently motivated the funders; Washington was a great place to invest in a high-tech future!
The public’s embrace of the Fair was slow and sceptical, given the huge investment in a risky proposition. The turning point came when the Needle went up in 1961, a year before the Fair’s opening. As a cost of $4.5 million, the Needle energised everyone! Just as East Berlin was putting up its defensive wall, the Needle was looking up to a new frontier!
Seattle Fair heads hired consultants, got seed money from wealthy donors and recruited community leaders. Once Seattle got the nod, the Federal Government funded a science pavilion, and property was acquired where urban amenities already existed: old armoury, Memorial Stadium & Civic Auditorium. Alas most of a working-class Edwardian neighbourhood was bulldozed in a slum clearance.
While visiting Stuttgart, Germany in 1959, CEO Edward Carlson saw the potential of a Space Age tower as a symbol for the 1962 Fair. Seattle investors organised a Corporation, and Carlson played a major part in the transformation of the Federal Science Pavilion into the permanent Science Centre. President of the Fair was Joe Gandy, a Ford dealer who travelled the world to recruit exhibitors and was responsible for obtaining approval for the Fair from the Bureau of International Expositions in Paris, essential for getting foreign governments to take part.
Fair organisers wanted an architectural showcase. So they turned to NW modernist architect Paul Thiry, well schooled in World’s Fairs, who designed the site and the Coliseum. Running the fair daily was field commander Ewen Dingwall, assisted by a skilled PR person, Jay Rockey, who got good coverage across the globe eg Life magazine!
The Fair also had the support of Washington’s energetic Senators Warren G Magnuson and Henry Scoop Jackson, who ultimately got $10 million Federal funding for the Science Pavilion. Clearly the push for more science apparently motivated the funders; Washington was a great place to invest in a high-tech future!
The public’s embrace of the Fair was slow and sceptical, given the huge investment in a risky proposition. The turning point came when the Needle went up in 1961, a year before the Fair’s opening. As a cost of $4.5 million, the Needle energised everyone! Just as East Berlin was putting up its defensive wall, the Needle was looking up to a new frontier!
Restaurant at the top of the Needle
The Space Needle’s rotating glass floor was located just below the open-air observation deck and replaced the original non-glass revolving floor that was a feature of the Space Needle’s Restaurant. Visitors can now look down on the Space Needle’s architecture. They also recognised that it could be a kind of global magnet for cosmopolitan cuisine. Fair visitors from overseas eg British Prince Philip, The Shah and Empress of Iran and the King Olaf of Norway loved the Needle’s menu eg fresh Dungeness crab, Puget Sound salmon, Alaskan shrimp. The Needle became a magnet for ‘60s celebrities including Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson and Bobby Kennedy etc
The Fair boosted the arts as well, including a showcase of modern art. Erna Gunther’s NW Coast Indian art exhibit impressed critics and Paul Horiuchi’s landmark mural shined. There was the new Opera House and a symphony orchestra led by Igor Stravinsky.
Locals saw John Glenn’s space capsule and believed they’d soon be taking Pan Am flights to Mars. Atomic cars, video telephones, computers and rapid transit would be possible. In 1962, the Space Needle installed some of the first cordless phones in the US, as were some of the first satellite transmissions of telephone calls and tv broadcasts. Seattle was at the centre of a dynamic future!
The Seattle Fair was a success, attracting millions. The profits paid off the private investors within only 3 months, giving the city an altering confidence. Note the Needle was not designated an official Seattle landmark until 1999.
Post card
The organisers of Century 21 succeeded in a way that is worth celebrating and analysing. South Lake Union was transformed into a technology and research centre, and they are planning a radically new waterfront, and a regional rail system. Seattle still aspires to be on the cutting edge of green technology and values, and still draws millions of locals and tourists, to see the Needle and the International Fountain etc.
Thank you to Packy
and to the Spaceneedle Fact Sheet History
14 comments:
So many World Fair facilities were built with the knowledge that they would be taken down after the Fair ended. Thank goodness Seattle was smarter than other cities.
I know the music from Igor Stravinsky's Russian period and French period, but his arrival in the USA must have been a pleasure for the people planning a World Fair. Imagine the excitement on the opening day of the World's Fair (April 1962) when the Seattle Symphony starred Igor Stravinsky as its guest conductor.
Train Man,
so true! Crystal Palace 1851 was spectacular, but afterwards, the building was relocated and later accidentally destroyed by fire. Galerie des Machines in Paris' 1899 World Fair was reused for the 1900 exhibition, before it was demolished in 1910. The Barcelona Pavilion was dismantled in 1930 shortly after the World Fair finished. Thankfully Melbourne International Exhibition of 1880 was protected from the get go.
Since Seattle invested millions of dollars into the city’s future as a world centre of science, architecture and the arts, the Needle and other facilities had to last forever.
Joseph
Harold Shaw assembled a Performing Arts programme for Seattle that he wanted to be the greatest array of talent in USA history. So he booked famous and talented performers in chamber music and classical music. During the 1962 World Fair, he was most proud of Igor Stravinsky!
I have never been to Seattle but would recognise the spaceneedle. It is good to know that all the investment led to a world centre is science that is still ongoing.
Hello Hels, The Needle may have lasted a long time, but I think that the temporary Trylon and Perisphere were more iconic, and in my personal opinion, better looking. As a collector, I have come across more Trylon-Perisphere memorabilia. Also, we talked before about lingering World's Fair structures that are still a classic part of at the very least San Francisco and St. Louis. Cleveland kept the gardens from its 1930's Great Lakes Exposition until the 1990's rebuilding of the Stadium--another example of sports enthusiasm annihilating culture.
--Jim
World Fairs are always and everywhere relevant.
I must admit I knew nothing about the Space Needle, until now. So, thanks for sharing this exciting information.
Boa tarde. Obrigado pela visita e carinho. Parabéns pelo seu trabalho maravilhoso, sempre aprendo bastante.
Fun60
Seattle planned, organised and funded this World Fair over 12 years, by the Chamber of Commerce, City Council, State and Federal governments, and private industries. It was a massive project, creating a permanent complex of cultural, scientific and infrastructure facilities. Thank goodness these facilities permanently added to Seattle's status.
Paarnassus
I had not heard of Trylon and Perisphere but I do know that some symbols catch the public attention as the focal point of a world fair. I suppose it was fortunate that Unisphere, the symbol of the 1964-65 world fair in New York, replaced the old symbols that had been lost.
The Great Lakes world fair in Cleveland was meant to showcase innovation and international thinkers. But like in so many other world fairs, most of Cleveland's complex was soon pulled down. The stunning gardens, as you noted, were the last components to be destroyed... shame on the developers.
I don't think I've ever heard much about Seattle, so this is somewhat interesting news to me. It was a successful investment of money by the public and private sector for a temporary event and left good infrastructure in place post the event. I wonder why Olympic organisers in different cities since didn't look at it as a blueprint for temporary events.
DUTA
Agreed... starting from London's Great Exhibition in 1851, cities around the world applied each four years to hold their own special presentation with their own special theme. I have lectured on this history many times and wrote it up in this blog many times, because it was always so exciting.
https://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2008/12/importance-of-universal-exhibitions.html
https://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2013/01/crystal-palace-1851-and-worlds-greatest.html
https://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2019/01/an-amazing-world-fair-in-tel-aviv-1934.html etc
Luiz
thank you. Have you ever been to a world fair? If all goes to plan, the 2023 world fair will be in Buenos Aires.
Andrew
I love Seattle because it is the US city that reminds me most of Melbourne :)
Re the design of World Fairs, they were not intended to be profit-makers. Rather they were to celebrate progress in industry and culture, to bring in millions of tourists from abroad and to give excitement to the locals. So host cities worried mainly about not going into enormous debt, rather than about cultural development, especially in countries where the private sector is the preferred source of community development.
Post a Comment