In the 1920s, my French architect Le Corbusier popularised an architecture that celebrated simple cubic forms of raw concrete as the epitome of modernism. Did he start the modernist fondness for raw concrete? The idea of natural finishes meant that the concrete was intentionally left raw.
After WW2, architects and engineers looked to concrete as the material that would help with mass housing and urban renewal. Unrefined concrete was an honest expression of their ethical goals, while plain forms and exposed structures were just as ethical. With the arrival of metal reinforcing, concrete came into its own with greater expanses and stronger structures. From Soviet housing complexes to Western European community projects, Brutalism became a modern, efficient and cheap solution for mass services. Brutalism had an era of popularity with professionals until the mid 1970s, but probably not with the general public.
So Brutalism was not just a style; it aimed to respond to a mass-production society. Up to now Brutalism has been discussed stylistically, whereas its essence was ethical.
It was functional, economical and progressive. It was essential to consider Brutalism’s ethics and politics. Firstly, Brutalism evokes an era of optimism and belief in the permanence of public institutions – government as well as public housing, educational and health facilities. Furthermore who wants more private developments destroying and replacing community-owned facilities?
Opened by Her Majesty the Queen, 1980.
Inevitably Brutalism became popular for public institutions, esp government buildings, cultural complexes, schools, universities and hospitals eg Canberra’s High Court Building and National Gallery of Australia, and Sydney’s University of Technology’s Tower.
Fans of concrete noted that it was a very beautiful and sculptural material when it was well looked after. But then all buildings required regular maintenance because all materials deteriorated, including concrete. This became very obvious in the 1960s when Brutalism went global.
Aesthetics provided a cover for this move, especially in inner cities where Brutalist institutions sat on valuable land. But restoration and renovation, rather than demolition and rebuilding, were often more sustainable solutions.
The idea of drama was central to Brutalism. The buildings were designed to celebrate the community wanting to make public space central! So these buildings were built with the idea of public good in mind.
I am examining two examples of Melbourne’s Brutalist architecture. One such example was the very grey Harold Holt Swimming Centre in Malvern. Designed by Daryl Jackson and Kevin Borland in 1967, the complex was one of Melbourne’s first to be built in the Brutalist style and was probably one of the state’s most important instances.
Harold Holt Swimming Centre, Malvern
Inevitably Brutalism became popular for public institutions, esp government buildings, cultural complexes, schools, universities and hospitals eg Canberra’s High Court Building and National Gallery of Australia, and Sydney’s University of Technology’s Tower.
Fans of concrete noted that it was a very beautiful and sculptural material when it was well looked after. But then all buildings required regular maintenance because all materials deteriorated, including concrete. This became very obvious in the 1960s when Brutalism went global.
Aesthetics provided a cover for this move, especially in inner cities where Brutalist institutions sat on valuable land. But restoration and renovation, rather than demolition and rebuilding, were often more sustainable solutions.
The idea of drama was central to Brutalism. The buildings were designed to celebrate the community wanting to make public space central! So these buildings were built with the idea of public good in mind.
I am examining two examples of Melbourne’s Brutalist architecture. One such example was the very grey Harold Holt Swimming Centre in Malvern. Designed by Daryl Jackson and Kevin Borland in 1967, the complex was one of Melbourne’s first to be built in the Brutalist style and was probably one of the state’s most important instances.
1967
The swimming complex originally consisted of two indoor pools and an outdoor Olympic-sized pool, diving pool with dive tower, wading pool and changing rooms. The indoor centre was a glass and concrete structure distinguished by its unpainted concrete block and off-form concrete construction in which the patterns created by the timber form-work were clearly seen. The principal components of the building's functional and structural system were emphasised as positive elements, in particular the circulation elements including concrete pedestrian ramps and semi-circular stair. There was a transparency through the entire site and natural light was maximised by glass walls on the indoor pool complex, enabling a clear sight line from the diving pool on the northern boundary through the pool complex to High St to the south.
The City of Stonnington has been trying to refurbish the building for some time, however the Heritage Council intervened and planned to give it heritage protection.
Harold Holt Swimming Centre does not represent the city’s first attempt to protect a Brutalist structure. In 1997, there was much controversy surrounding the alterations to the National Gallery of Victoria and in 1999, a section of the Waverly Park Stadium was heritage listed when the venue was closed down.
By 1863 the Free St Kilda Public Library and Mechanics’ Institute was operating in the old Town Hall (now gone). But before WW1 the library was in decline and after transferring to the present Town Hall, closed down.
Sweeping lines of wide overhanging eaves and sloping wall surfaces that appear to float over the ground. St Kilda Library fits happily into its environment, 1973.
The swimming complex originally consisted of two indoor pools and an outdoor Olympic-sized pool, diving pool with dive tower, wading pool and changing rooms. The indoor centre was a glass and concrete structure distinguished by its unpainted concrete block and off-form concrete construction in which the patterns created by the timber form-work were clearly seen. The principal components of the building's functional and structural system were emphasised as positive elements, in particular the circulation elements including concrete pedestrian ramps and semi-circular stair. There was a transparency through the entire site and natural light was maximised by glass walls on the indoor pool complex, enabling a clear sight line from the diving pool on the northern boundary through the pool complex to High St to the south.
The City of Stonnington has been trying to refurbish the building for some time, however the Heritage Council intervened and planned to give it heritage protection.
Harold Holt Swimming Centre does not represent the city’s first attempt to protect a Brutalist structure. In 1997, there was much controversy surrounding the alterations to the National Gallery of Victoria and in 1999, a section of the Waverly Park Stadium was heritage listed when the venue was closed down.
By 1863 the Free St Kilda Public Library and Mechanics’ Institute was operating in the old Town Hall (now gone). But before WW1 the library was in decline and after transferring to the present Town Hall, closed down.
Photo Credit enricotaglietti
In Dec 1971 a tender was accepted to construct Enrico Taglietti’s design and the new St Kilda library was opened by the Victorian Governor in May 1973. Its building referenced St Kilda’s waterfront setting: a sleek grey ocean-going cruiser its 10 metre high smoke-stack towers over saloon windows and portholes piercing its battleship grey flanks. The library was a deceptively large building, it covered c50 metres square from Carlisle to Duke Sts. This Brutalist design, with its stained rough timbers and exposed raw concrete, was a clear nod to Le Corbusier.
In 1994, Ashton Raggatt McDougall’s design for a major addition to the library was under construction, along with their major addition and reconstruction of the Town Hall complex opposite.
Note that Perth Brutal: Dreaming in Concrete will be at the Art Gallery in Perth from Sept 2019–Feb 2020, celebrating the gallery’s 40th anniversary.
In 1994, Ashton Raggatt McDougall’s design for a major addition to the library was under construction, along with their major addition and reconstruction of the Town Hall complex opposite.
Note that Perth Brutal: Dreaming in Concrete will be at the Art Gallery in Perth from Sept 2019–Feb 2020, celebrating the gallery’s 40th anniversary.
.jpg)
8 comments:
Hello Hels, Brutalism does not exist in a vacuum, so its total effect will depend, like all architecture, on its environment and the quality of the architect's conception. Since it can be plain and drab looking, it can be (at least to me) really dismal, as in the Gary, Indiana Public Library, Gary itself having taken on something of the quality of a war-zone.
On the other hand, Paul Rudolph's Art and Architecture Building at Yale is in the middle of a lively and varied campus, and adds an interesting element which exposes people to Brutalist architecture, and form a frequent focus of discussion. Also, the Rudolph building is a bit on the complex side, offsetting some of the potential plainness of the style.
--Jim
Hey Hel
Walking into St Kilda library always reminds me of an underground concrete bunker built during the war. Surprisingly inside the library is airy and spacious.
Parnassus
that is true for every design school. The founder will lay out the requirements in writing and with visual examples, and others will either follow the founder closely or branch out. I assumed _every_ artist in Europe followed Caravaggio closely, but Caravaggio became very angry when it came to matters of artistic originality: he threatened Guido Reni and Giovanni Baglione for their independent artistic decisions.
From the outside, Gary Public Library certainly looks very harsh, but was the architect presenting his own modern taste? Was the city council running out of money? Is the climate in Gary better suited to concrete than, say, timber or brick?
Yes Paul Rudolph's Art and Architecture Building at Yale is much more interesting from the outside. I bet it took far longer to order all the different materials and cost far more to build.
Deb
StKilda is my local library and I agree, the interior is very spacious. But going in the main door, with high concrete on both sides, looks like Guernsey or Jersey during the war. And have a look at Jonathan Andrews photos of bunkers in Holland:
https://www.wired.com/2013/02/world-war-ii-bunkers-jonathan-andrew/ Those bunkers will survive for eternity.
I am not a fan of brutalist architecture and certainly not the Harold Holt pool but St Kilda Library works well for me. A few outstanding examples could be preserved but generally.........let it go.
Andrew
Unless a building is defective in some way eg asbestos cladding, I would not be pulling down old buildings that we no longer like. After all, every generation dislikes what their father's generation created.
Just today we were inspecting Victorian and Edwardian houses and shops that were being pulled down for ugly modern flats. Heartbreaking!
+
my favorite brutalist building is Heide2 in Templestowe. My Motherin law lived in City Edge which is the first medium to high density development in Melbourne . Built in 1970ish by Evan Walker on the corner of Park street in Sth Melbourne .Its a wonderful place with wonderful central courtyard and such a lovely place to live .It Has a very human scale .
mem
I have visited Heide II twice, but didn't read a review of the architecture and interior designs until: https://www.australiandesignreview.com/architecture/life-cycle-heide-ii/
Heide II is often cited as a triumph for modernist architecture, and as a house of radical art. At the time (1963), architecture was turning away from the orthodox modernism of international functionalism and toward greater monumentality and a new level of meaning. Accordingly Heide II alternates masses and voids, loosening and tightening their connection by turns. The photos are gorgeous!
Post a Comment