Pierre (top) and Paul Wertheimer
Both brothers married in 1910, and both had babies. But the joy ended when the new fathers were mobilised in WW1. By the time the sons took over the company’s directorships, Bourjois became the largest cosmetic-fragrance company in France. In the next decade, Bourjois had already signed licences in 100+ countries – a huge success!
Pierre was also an avid horseman who began a great racing dynasty, important in the Wertheimer story because it was at Longchamp racetrack that Pierre Wertheimer met Coco Chanel. They were introduced by Théophile Bader, founder of Galeries Lafayette.
In 1922, Chanel’s #5 perfume was launched. It had been available to an elite clientele IN her exclusive Paris boutique, but to market the perfume professionally, Coco needed someone with wide experience in commerce, international business connections and access to large amounts of capital. In 1924 Pierre and Paul Wertheimer became Coco's business partners in the House of Chanel.
Would the perfume business have survived, had Chanel been alone? NO! For a 70% share of the company, the Wertheimers provided ALL financing for production, marketing and distribution of Chanel #5. Théophile Bader, who was selling Chanel #5 to the public in his Galeries Lafayette, was given a 20% share. Chanel herself received the other 10% of the stock, licensed her name to Parfums Chanel.
Chanel needed people who could help her career, including Christian Dior, Elsa Shiaparelli, Yves Saint Laurent. But Chanel never married! In 1925, Hugh Grosvenor, 2nd Duke Westminster met Chanel in Monte Carlo and purchased a London home for her in prestigious Mayfair district. In 1927 he gave her a parcel of land on French Riviera, to build her villa. This pro-German, anti-Semitic British Duke liaison with Chanel lasted for 10 years, the same time Chanel's friendship with Winston Churchill also blossomed.
Chanel’s lover from 1930 until his death was designer- illustrator Paul Iribe (1883–1935). His art showed aggressive patriotism, fuelling anti-Semitism and fear of foreigners.
The Duke & Duchess of Windsor married in June 1937, combining their dislike of Jews, trade unions, socialism, Freemasons & communism. The royal couple settled in Paris amid a glamorous social set of designers, Nazi sympathisers, American heiresses, British ex-pats and idle rich. Including Coco Chanel!
WW2 brought the Nazi seizure of Jewish owned property and businesses, and anticipating Nazi mandates against Jews, the Wertheimers quickly protected their company. While still in France the brothers legally turned control of Parfums Chanel over to a Christian, French industrialist Felix Amiot. As Germany was invading France, the brothers fled to New York, where Estée Lauder (1908-2004) helped set them up.
From NY the brothers sent an American emissary, H Gregory Thomas, back to France with a mission: to get the formula for #5 and the main ingredients (jasmine oils) from Grasse. Thomas also helped Pierre's son Jacques escape to US.
Chanel had never been satisfied with the ownership contract so in May 1941, as the Occupation took half of France, she used her Vichy connections to try to force the brothers out of the contract. Calling the company abandoned, Chanel argued that company Les Parfums Chanel had been Jewish property that should be confiscated & redistributed solely back to her, an Aryan. Felix Amiot ensured she failed!
After middle-aged Coco Chanel closed her Paris fashion business, she continued to live across the street at the plush Hotel Ritz, Nazi headquarters in Paris. She soon began a romance with a young, athletic officer named Hans Gunther von Dincklage, a Nazi propaganda officer
At 87 Chanel was busy working but died in Jan 1971 and was buried in the Bois-de-Vaux Cemetery, Lausanne. When she died without family, who inherited the business? In the ultimate irony, her old perfume company partners, Pierre & Paul Wertheimer, did. When they died, the company was passed down to Pierre’s son Jacques Wertheimer, and then to Jacques’ sons, Alain & Gerald Wertheimer. In 1983 German fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld (1933-2019) became, and remained Chanel’s creative director.
Wartime Sites in Paris: 1939-1945 by Steven Lehrer is excellent for Wertheimer family history.
Would the perfume business have survived, had Chanel been alone? NO! For a 70% share of the company, the Wertheimers provided ALL financing for production, marketing and distribution of Chanel #5. Théophile Bader, who was selling Chanel #5 to the public in his Galeries Lafayette, was given a 20% share. Chanel herself received the other 10% of the stock, licensed her name to Parfums Chanel.
Chanel needed people who could help her career, including Christian Dior, Elsa Shiaparelli, Yves Saint Laurent. But Chanel never married! In 1925, Hugh Grosvenor, 2nd Duke Westminster met Chanel in Monte Carlo and purchased a London home for her in prestigious Mayfair district. In 1927 he gave her a parcel of land on French Riviera, to build her villa. This pro-German, anti-Semitic British Duke liaison with Chanel lasted for 10 years, the same time Chanel's friendship with Winston Churchill also blossomed.
Chanel’s lover from 1930 until his death was designer- illustrator Paul Iribe (1883–1935). His art showed aggressive patriotism, fuelling anti-Semitism and fear of foreigners.
The Duke & Duchess of Windsor married in June 1937, combining their dislike of Jews, trade unions, socialism, Freemasons & communism. The royal couple settled in Paris amid a glamorous social set of designers, Nazi sympathisers, American heiresses, British ex-pats and idle rich. Including Coco Chanel!
WW2 brought the Nazi seizure of Jewish owned property and businesses, and anticipating Nazi mandates against Jews, the Wertheimers quickly protected their company. While still in France the brothers legally turned control of Parfums Chanel over to a Christian, French industrialist Felix Amiot. As Germany was invading France, the brothers fled to New York, where Estée Lauder (1908-2004) helped set them up.
From NY the brothers sent an American emissary, H Gregory Thomas, back to France with a mission: to get the formula for #5 and the main ingredients (jasmine oils) from Grasse. Thomas also helped Pierre's son Jacques escape to US.
Chanel had never been satisfied with the ownership contract so in May 1941, as the Occupation took half of France, she used her Vichy connections to try to force the brothers out of the contract. Calling the company abandoned, Chanel argued that company Les Parfums Chanel had been Jewish property that should be confiscated & redistributed solely back to her, an Aryan. Felix Amiot ensured she failed!
After middle-aged Coco Chanel closed her Paris fashion business, she continued to live across the street at the plush Hotel Ritz, Nazi headquarters in Paris. She soon began a romance with a young, athletic officer named Hans Gunther von Dincklage, a Nazi propaganda officer
Coco Chanel and Gen Walter Schellenberg, chief of the Abwehr
warhistoryonline
Chanel was also very close to Nazi Gen Walter Schellenberg, chief of SS intelligence. Clearly Chanel collaborated with this Abwehr agent, honoured by Hitler & Goebbels, and was herself recruited as an agent into Abwehr. It paid off! Chanel kept a car, driver and petrol all war: no one but a Vichy Minister had that!
Chanel was also very close to Nazi Gen Walter Schellenberg, chief of SS intelligence. Clearly Chanel collaborated with this Abwehr agent, honoured by Hitler & Goebbels, and was herself recruited as an agent into Abwehr. It paid off! Chanel kept a car, driver and petrol all war: no one but a Vichy Minister had that!
Note that on several occasions, Félix Amiot was summoned by the Gestapo. But in Sept 1944, when Chanel was questioned by the Free French Purge Committee, they had no documented evidence of her German collaboration and had to release her. Perhaps Winston Churchill intervened with the French government, via Viscount Duff Cooper, British ambassador to the French provisional government.
Coco escaped quietly to Switzerland, and Felix Amiot turned Parfums Chanel back to the Wertheimers.
So in the early 1950s, Pierre Wertheimer visited Chanel at the Beau Rivage hotel in Lausanne and they came to a mutual agreement. Pierre gave her $9 million for her percentage of the perfume sales during the war. The tens of millions that she made later, thanks to this perfume, made her one of the richest women in the world. Her future share would be 2% of all perfume sales worldwide. Pierre Wertheimer took full control of Chanel in 1954, paying for the remaining 20% from Théophile Bader’s family. Returning to Paris in 1954, Coco was back in Rue Cambon.
Wartime Sites in Paris: 1939-1945 by Steven Lehrer is excellent for Wertheimer family history.
That was complex but a read worthy of concentration and focus. The Windsors were not really very nice people, were they. Maybe it was a good thing that he was a short term king.
ReplyDeleteMostly we know about successful people, but I have never heard of Felix Amiot. Brave and very lucky.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting to learn of the other side to Coco Chanel - what an unpleasant person.
ReplyDeleteAndrew
ReplyDeleteThe Duke & Duchess of Windsor were shockers :( As king he was forbidden to marry a multiple divorcee to he voluntarily gave up the throne to marry the American in June 1937. But much worse than that, they were both pro-Hitler, anti-workers and anti-Semitic, so they were forced to live outside Britain. Living in Paris with Nazi sympathisers and American heiresses might have suited the Duke and Duchess, but it was humiliating for ordinary British families who were struggling and suffering.
Joe
ReplyDeleteHe was a hero, yes. After Germany invaded France in 1941, Chanel petitioned the Vichy government and Nazi officials for sole ownership of her perfume company. But the Wertheimer brothers, ? knowing about Chanel’s committed plan to take control of her perfume business, and the anti-Jewish laws that operated in Germany, had ensured that would never happen. But here is the ironic part; before the war the Wertheimers had given full control of their share to a French Christian industrialist named Felix Amiot who had willingly sold arms to the Nazis! Their choice of Amiot as their Aryan proxy worked out!
jabblog
ReplyDeleteI felt sorry for Coco Chanel because she was dumped into an orphanage as a toddler and probably never saw her family again. And I also think she was amazingly talented with designs that made women look excellent. But her moral values, and her lovers, depended on who could help her more - Jews, Christians, Nazis, Germans, French or British PMs.
Very interesting. Do you know WHY Chanel's old perfume company partners inherited her company? She left no will?
ReplyDeleteHello Hels, I never heard much nice about Chanel and her crowd, and now with your post my opinion is even lower. (Saying she was talented is the same as saying that Wagner and Dickens were talented.) I don't know enough about business history to evaluate the 10% deal, but I do know that many have become very rich on seemingly small royalties or percentages.
ReplyDelete--Jim
Handmade
ReplyDelete70% of the company belonged to the Wertheimer brothers' because they funded all the manufacture, distribution and selling of the products from the mid 1920s on.
Although Chanel got naming rights, she never owned more than 10% of the stock. As much as I loved her designs, she tried to be a ruthless thief.
Parnassus
ReplyDeletePeople will do whatever they have do to stay alive and to prosper.
The Wertheimers were already in the U.S! So Channel saw her chance to tell the Vichy court that the Wertheimers had deserted and therefore the old contract was void. Luckily she failed.
Some of this I knew I have never tried the perfume either
ReplyDeleteSuch a fascinating story and history. I will tell mum about it as she likes the company.
ReplyDeleteThat is quite the story about Coco Chanel. And it's interesting how what went around, came back after Chanel died.
ReplyDeleteI remember some of those labels though I have never bought them. I'm not a make-up user, sticking with moisturiser (nivea) and sunscreen. I did buy some perfume several years ago, a Christmas gift for a grand daughter and got a bottle for myself at the same time, I still have it though it has only one or two squirts left.
ReplyDeleteRiver
ReplyDeleteI don't blame you for not putting mucky stuff on your face. Nor will I ever forgive Chanel for her immoral behaviour against the very family who totally supported her
But we still have to acknowledge that Coco Chanel's products were VERY popular, satisfyingly simple and rather expensive. Even today, Chanel No. 5 is a classic, probably the most exclusive perfume in the world.
Erika
ReplyDeleteCoco Chanel lived longer than both Pierre and Paul Wertheimer, and might have expected to take the brothers' large shares in the company after they had both died (in 1948 and 1965). But when she died in 1971 _without any spouse or children_, her solicitors knew from all her legal papers that her old perfume partners had to pass the company down to Pierre’s son Jacques Wertheimer (and then the grandchildren).
Despite the fact that Pierre gave her $9 million for her percentage of the perfume sales during WW2, she still bitterly resented both Wertheimer brothers.
roentare
ReplyDeleteFrom my mum I certainly knew about Coco Chanel's graceful life in the gorgeous Hotel Ritz Paris, Nazi headquarters, during the horrors of WW2. And my mum knew Chanel soon lived with a Nazi officer called Hans Gunther von Dincklage. This designer clearly enjoyed a wonderful war!
However your mum may or may not know about the critical role the Wertheimers played.
Jo-Anne
ReplyDeleteDo try the perfume at least once, to know how talented she was. Only then should you read
about Chanel's life, from miserable orphanage to world fame:
https://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2011/06/coco-chanel-from-neglected-orphan-to.html
and the glamorous Hotel Ritz under German control:
https://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com/2014/08/hotel-ritz-in-paris-german-occupation.html
Very interesting regarding Coco Chanel and only a small percentage of the company - shame she didn't marry or have children.
ReplyDeleteI liked that I read things, which I had not read before. Very interesting information for me Coco Chanel was a fashion icon but... Thanks for the post. Have a nice day!
ReplyDeleteMargaret
ReplyDeleteI assume Chanel didn't have children of her own because her childhood in the orphanage was so horrible. Although apparently she did look after her nephew, following her sister's suicide. On the other hand, her so-called nephew might have been Coco's own child.
Nobody knew what to believe! More pain occurred when Coco's two sisters, Julia-Berthe and Antoinette, died tragically as young women. The details of the sisters' lives were never exposed publicly, thanks to Coco’s vigorous attempts to hide everything related to her family's past.
Katarina
ReplyDeleteBlogging is important! There are many famous people, extremely talented in their public specialist areas, who turned out to be immoral in their personal lives.
Charles Dickens is my normal example. A great writer and social activist, he treated his wife and mistress worse than dirt, privately and publicly. In Charles Dickens' biographies, he said Catherine was dull, ugly, fat and a wretched mother and housekeeper. After 20 years and 10 children, HE never allowed his wife to see her own children.
Beautiful blog
ReplyDeleteBoa tarde de quarta-feira minha querida amiga. Suas matérias são ricas e muito interessantes. Com bastante conteúdo e explicações.
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing this fascinating history! It's amazing to see how the collaboration between Coco Chanel and the Wertheimer brothers shaped the perfume industry. I just shared a new post on my blog. Let me know your views about it. www.melodyjacob.com
ReplyDeleteI like the perfume Chanel 5, but knew nothing of Coco's history.
ReplyDeleteIn spite of having several lovers, she died without any family?! That's tragic.
Rajani
ReplyDeletethank you for reading the post. Are you particularly interested in inter-war history?
Luiz
ReplyDeleteWelcome. I didn't realise how important the Wertheimer family had been in France and then the US.
I certainly did know a great deal about Coco Chanel's entire life, and used the references in her books to chase up the Wertheimers. The article in the Sydney Morning Herald was helpful, but even then, I needed much more information. See
"Chanel opens its books for the first time to reveal a $62b fortune"
by Elizabeth Paton, June 22, 2018
https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/chanel-opens-its-books-for-the-first-time-to-reveal-a-62b-fortune-20180622-p4zn18.html
DUTA
ReplyDeletefamily life had been pretty hideous for ALL her family. Mother Eugénie died of TB in 1895 and Coco's very young brothers were put to work on farms in primary school. Father Albert, unable to support his family, dumped his three daughters in an orphanage. When they were released, young sisters Antoinette and Julia-Berthe seemed to have tragically died (TB, suicide or pneumonia).
No wonder Coco never planned on having children of her own.
Melody
ReplyDeleteI think collaborations were always important, even though consumers and viewers may hear nothing about the important workers... other than the designer of course. The "stars" are unlikely to share the credit around, even to the people who funded all their success.
The coats are perfect because
1. we don't buy or wear heavy coats in Australia, even in winter. And
2. the flat design is flattering for most women. Noone wants to look like a round snowman.
I had no idea Coco Chanel was trash. I'm so very pleased at how it all turned out, especially her company going to the Wertheimer family on her death. No 5 is my favourite perfume, followed by Worth's Je Reviens. I have old fashioned taste it seems
ReplyDeleteMandy
ReplyDeleteOf course No 5 is still yours and many other women's favourite perfumes. And even now I can still see why her clothes were perfect for the times. So I have decided to focus on her great talents, rather than constantly being offended by her personal politics.
It is like not acknowledging Enid Blyton's major contribution to children's literature because she had less admirable qualities that were exposed much later.