18 January 2025

Weimar Republic 1918-33: great culture, great democracy

Pres Paul von Hindenburg
Wiki

The usual image of the Weimar Republic was one of political instability, economic crisis and cultural decadence. That always seemed ridiculous to me since this republic was Germany’s new system of democratic government after the Second Reich collapsed. The name was chosen because Berlin was still in the midst of revolution when the Imperial period ended in 1918. So the first Assembly for the new Republic was held in Jan 1919 in Weimar instead.

My best German era started when Weimar Republic politics became democratic, social freedoms arrived and vibrant artistic movements blossomed. The tricky cond­itions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles and economic instab­ility only made governmental support more urgent.

Intellectual and political democracy
The Weimar era was noted for these amazing successes:
1.Political power was rested in the Reichstag
2.Universal voting for ALL adults led to a genuine democracy
3.unemployment insurance was introduced
4.working weeks were reduced from 50 hours to 46.
5.free speech was guaranteed.
6.religious freedom was guaranteed
7.sciences were promoted in the universities and scientists supported at work

Arts The Bauhaus Academy opened in 1919 where expressionist artists overcame the rigid traditions of the main art academies. The new style which flourished in the German-speaking nations was characterised by distorted forms, sharp colour contrasts, dark shadows, weird angles and distorted id­ent­it­ies. Bauhaus was great for young architects when a new wave of designers foll­ow­ed Walter Grop­ius (1883-1969) instead of traditional or cl­ass­ical architects. It foll­owed a new post-war Western spirit when cultural modernity would be Germany’s reparations to the world. What happened when the learned Weimar Rep­ublic suff­er­ed high inflation?

A woman exchanges vegetables for baskets of money during the hyperinflation of 1923 
Law & Liberty

In Berlin post-WW1, Christian Schad became an model of New Objectivity,  painting cool, sharp portraits of his social milieu. He painted the androgynous Sonja, with fashionable cloth­es, cropped hair and smoking Camel cigarettes, all attributes of the independent New Woman. New Object­ivity spread through various cities, creating cynical depictions of injured war veter­ans, jobless workers and war profiteers. They portrayed an scarred society, denouncing WW1's devastating effects.

Many works railed against both capitalism and WW1's effects on society. Otto Dix’s anti-militarist The Skat Players 1920 marked his trans­ition to the social­ly critical New Realism, depicting 3 hideously disfigured office­rs in a café playing skat card game. And Dix completed 4 panels in a triptych, like a church altarpiece, depicting horrid morb­idity with putrefied flesh, gangrene and death. Was Dix reflecting the German nationalism that was surging in the more tense political atmosphere in the Depression? His critics certainly hated his anti-German, hypercritical views of WW1 and post-war society.

George Grosz, 
Eclipse of the Sun, 1926
Weimar Republic

Films Through the 1920s Fritz Lang made ambitious films, includ­ing the al­l­egorical melo­drama Destiny (1921) and Dr Mabuse The Gambler (1922). In 1924 he first travelled to film companies in New York and Hollywood. Lang’s first project back in Germany was the futuristic, expensive master-piece Metropolis (1927). The plot showed a repressive society with exp­loited workers, lazy rulers and emotionless robots. Lang created his vis­ually detailed films where he blended shots of miniatures with live action. After a crime film Spies in 1928, Lang returned to science fict­ion for Woman in the Moon (1929). M (1931) was a German thriller, filled with horrifying light­ing and sound. It was Fritz Lang’s first sound film, starring a chill­ing Peter Lorre, Lang’s greatest global success.

Wedekind’s early play formed the basis for Viennese director G.W Pabst's famous silent film Pand­ora's Box in 1929 star­ring Louise Brooks as Lulu, a masterpiece of C20th opera. Fritz Kohn-Kortner was an Austrian stage-actor who became one of the era's most famous silent actors. Talkies arrived in late 1929, producing a flourish of German film. Sound production and distribution were quickly taken up and soon Germany had 3,800 cinemas with sound. G.W Pabst's version of Bertolt Brecht's The Three-penny Opera 1931 and Lang's M 1931 were landmark talkies.

Berlin jazz girls with mandolins at a 1929 cabaret
A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Cabaret were nightclubs where patrons sat at tables, entertained by singers, dancers and comedians on a stage like Moulin Rouge. Berlin’s first cabaret nightclub (1901) was during the reign of Kaiser Wilhelm II when German cabarets were not permitted to perform lewd humour, bawdy dancing or political satire. But by 1920s, Berlin became known for its high living and vibrant urban life. Some cabarets were patronised by gay men and lesbians; once forced to conceal their sexuality, they used the cabaret scene to openly display it. Right wingers were horrified.

So what was the impact of Weimar democracy and cultural dominance? The Weimar Years: Rise and Fall 1918-1933 by Frank McDonough suggested that finding a detailed narrative history of Weimar Germany was tricky. Other writers focused on specific aspects of the era where the rise of Adolf Hitler dominated history. Fortunately The Weimar Years was NOT a history of Hitler’s rise to power. 

The first key man was Chancellor and Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann, the man McDonough considered the only politician who could have saved German democracy. Stresemann’s diplomatic skills inspired political compromise within the Republic, while his peaceful foreign policy vision triumphed at Locarno, sparking a new spirit of friendship towards Germany and winning him the Nobel Peace Prize before his death in 1929. I had never heard this mentioned.


“The second was President Paul von Hindenburg, widely seen in the 1920s as a hero. Initially non-partisan, the old monarchist and ex-military leader soon reverted to the right. From 1930 he governed in accordance with his right-wing preferences and gave little thought to the views of the elected Reichstag. But as McDonough argued, the blame did not lie with individuals: there were structural issues with Weimar democracy baked into its constitution, Article 48 of which enabled Hindenburg to disregard the Reichstag. Proportional representation made coalition government difficult. Issues with the system, more than the economic misery, inspired Germans to vote for the Nazis. So the mortal damage was dealt by Hindenburg. Thank you to Frank McDonough for his excellent history.

Weimar Republic, 1919–1933
MoMA
Press to expand



24 comments:

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, The short-lived Weimar Republic had its high points, but as you also point out, it perhaps contained the seeds of its own destruction. It was followed by the most depraved episode in human history. It seems as though history might be repeating itself, many current world leaders tearing to shreds anything with intellect, fairness, culture, or dignity, and actively working towards a new low level of barbarism.
--Jim

roentare said...

I recently read about Angela Merkel's past efforts to navigate the political landscape in a manner reminiscent of the Weimar Republic. Are we at risk of experiencing the subsequent disaster?

Fun60 said...

I know so little about the Weimar Republic that I found this post really interesting especially the 7 very positive aims .

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

Not a topic I knew anything at all about, so found this really interesting it sounds like it had its good points and its not so good points which is like so many times in history.

Ирина Полещенко said...

Dear Helen! It was so interesting to read about the Weimar Republic! Thank you very much!

Katerinas Blog said...

The Weimar Republic is one of the most instructive periods in modern history,
showing how economic crisis, political instability and external pressures can lead to the rise of authoritarian regimes.
Thanks for reminding us of positive goals.
If we don't remember history, unfortunately we will live it again!!
Thanks for the article!!

Margaret D said...

Didn't know a thing about Weimar Republic, thanks to you I know some.
Take care.

BBC said...

In early 1919 the Allies met to discuss how to punish Germany and in June 1919 the new German government was forced to sign a peace settlement, Treaty of Versailles. This punished Germany militarily, territorially and financially. Germany was forced to accept the blame for the war:
Reparations - The money Germany had to pay for the damage suffered by Britain and France during the war, set at £6.6 billion. Armed Forces - Germany’s army was significantly reduced in size and its air force abolished. Tanks were banned. Germany’s navy was allowed only 6 battleships and no submarines. Territory - Germany lost land on all sides of its borders as well as its overseas colonies. Alsace-Lorraine went back to France. France took the coal from the Saar region. Some Upper Silesia went to the newly formed Czechoslovakia, and some to Poland – both of which Germany had to recognise as independent countries. Posen and Danzig were given to Poland. East Prussia was cut off from the rest of Germany by Poland in the middle. Rhineland was demilitarised, providing France with an extra protection zone. Anschluss, the union of Germany and Austria, was forbidden.

No wonder many Germans felt their country had received a very harsh deal in the treaty and resented their government for agreeing to these conditions.

Hels said...

Parnassus
I am not sure that the Weimar Republic contained the seeds of its own destruction. Short of fleeing the country, there was nothing much that a democratic, culturally focused and university-oriented government could have done. People who were still angry about Germany's defeat in the war and even angrier about workers' rights... did not seem likely to admire the new democracy.

Hels said...

roentare
I liked the analysis of Angela Merkel that said:The uncertainty of Germany’s political situation called for attention for 3 reasons: the country’s status in Europe, Angela Merkel’s personal status and the inevitable but excessive mention of the Weimar Republic. I would not have even made the connection, had you not made the comment above.

So what about the future? On the left sadness at the loss of centralist Merkel. The uber conservatives saw Merkel as the worst chancellor in recent history, so her successors needed to shift ever more vigorously to the right. Sigh

Hels said...

Fun60
Unless a government gives its policies in detail, we really don't know much about what they meant. Thus the 7 aims spelt out their goals specifically and positively eg all men and all women over 20 have the vote. Perhaps you could read "Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy" by Eric Weitz.

Hels said...

Jo-Anne
True. Somehow true democracies do well as long as they can, then they tend to end tragically. Let me re-mention: "Weimar Germany: Promise and Tragedy" by Eric Weitz.

Hels said...

Irina
my blogging responsibility is being fulfilled :) A lot of people didn't know much about the Weimar Republic when I first started talking about it.

Hels said...

Katerina
If we re-live the tragic end of the Weimar Republic again, all the thinkers, historians and politicians in the modern world have learned nothing :( Of course there were economic crises, political instability and external pressures trying to destroy Weimar, but there are crises in every nation.

Despite the Weimar Republic being democratic, equalitarian, cultured and educationally focused, the vested conservative interests tried to mobilise these world crises, _specifically_ in order to destroy Weimar.

Hels said...

Margaret
you are not the only one. So many of my students, even well read historians, saw it as an era of total failure and the start of right wing domination.

Hels said...

BBC
when you consider the harsh details of the Versailles Treaty, it is not surprising that German nationalists were likely to be livid. I think I would be too.

But those endless Treaty demands were spelled out in mid 1919, soon after the Republic was established. Why didn't the new government ban the destructive behaviour of the right wingers? Why did the angry right wingers not try to win more votes in Parliament, so they could have more influence on the legislation?

Andrew said...

And then there were the poorer people in German society.

Hels said...

Andrew
After WW1 there was poverty everywhere, probably 40% of workers being unemployed. But Germany additionally had impossible reparations payments, very high unemployment and hyperinflation. What Weimar Republic DID achieve for their citizens was an Unemployment Insurance Act took 3% of worker’s wages and provided an unemployment benefit. Thankfully pay also increased.

Of course the Great Depression from 1929 on was hideous everywhere, but it caused great economic hardship for the German people, probably third worst in the world.

My name is Erika. said...

That was quite a culturally diverse time in Germany. All I really knew was about the poverty at that time, although when I read Ken Follett's Winter of the World (fictional) was how he did have some of his characters in Germany not only in poverty but also hitting some clubs during that time. It's a good book, researched but not an indexed history. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Hels said...

Erika
The only academic journals I had read told how The Republic was seen by right wing Germans as having been forced upon them by the Allies when WW1 ended. Many Germans clearly remained deeply sympathetic to the Kaiser who was forced to resign, and to the leadership of the Second Reich who had opposed the Treaty of Versailles. So I too knew nothing about the Republic that should have been seen as democratic and culturally superior to much of the rest of the world.
But the more I followed German universities, sciences and Bauhaus' history, the more it became obvious that political turmoil and economic hardship did not negate the new social freedoms and vibrant artistic movements in this complex era.

Mandy said...

I wasn't familiar with the Weimar Republic, although I realise I'm familiar with a lot of the art and architecture. What a fascinating era and how sad that it was so hated by the right. It sadly reminds me that anything progressive and enlightened seems to be similarly divisive in society today

Hels said...

Mandy
Art and architecture were very telling, yes. Gropius’ progressive dreams meant the Bauhaus Weimar suffered from political pressure throughout its 6 years, particularly from the right wing forces that grew in Weimar - protests, newspaper articles and complaints to the City Council. So the hugely successful school was forced to leave Weimar in 1925, and then from Dessau to Berlin in 1932. Eventually Bauhaus was banned by the Nazis in 1933.

William Schmitt said...

Thanks for the article on the Weimar history. Having studied WW2 and the Nazi regime, you could point at many things for the downfall of the Weimar
Republic. Like tRump’s reelection, how could it have happened? Did The Treaty of Versailles and the depression allow Hitler, or was it his message? Fear and scapegoats seem to be enemy of any democracy.

Hels said...

William
that is such an important question : how could the Weimar Republic have been so brutally destroyed? Especially since the Germans were the most educated peopple, the most talented artists of all genres, the best scientists and even a linguistically skilled nation. And its democracy was excellent.

But the Weimar Republic faced very severe economic hardship caused by the absurd reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles after WWI. This caused hyperinflation and political instability, in turn encouraging right wing parties to gain more power and to undermined public faith in their own government.
I would still ask why the horrible struggle financially and politically made a clever nation move to the extreme right? Will the same happen in the US?