17 September 2024

Mark Rothko's unusual chapel, Houston Tx.


Mark Rothko

Mark Rothkowitz Rothko (1903–70) was raised in an Orthodox Jewish family in Dvinsk Latvia, rejecting Jew­ish obser­v­ance as a teenager only once they were in the US. Yet his life in New York was inflect­ed by Jewish culture at nearly every turn, especially in the art­is­t­ic company he kept, including Adolph Gottlieb, Barnett Newman and Louise Nevelson. Plus the curat­ors and critics he dealt and argued with eg Clement Greenberg and Harold Rosenberg. Examine his early works in this blog.

Rothko began with the idea of a painted environment in the 1950s, when he created his Seagram murals for a posh NY rest­aur­ant which was still under construction at the time. After complet­ing 40 great paintings in dark reds and browns, he loathed his work be­ing seen as fancy wall­paper. Rothko had a fit of rage, reneged on the deal and withdrew his works in 1958. Alas Roth­ko’s depression & paranoia were over­whelming him, so the art­ist stored the paintings until they were given to London’s Tate Gallery

Plaza in front of windowless chapel
Barnett Newman steel monument, Broken Ob­elisk

While Rothko had succeeded by the 1960s, he felt many view­ers failed to grasp the true signif­icance of his works. So he acc­epted a chapel commission from Franco-American oil philan­thropists John and Domin­ique de Menil in 1964. The chapel was to be the cul­min­ating monument in the Catholic Uni­versity of St Thomas in Houston Texas. Rothko’s wanted to evoke relig­ious responses from viewers. But why was it so crucial to an appreciation of his work?

The project’s first architect, Philip Joh­nson, had a Greek cross in mind. The chapel was orig­in­ally intended to be Roman Catholic, mod­elled on the Byz­antine Cath­edral of St Maria Assunta in Torcello Venice. But without a gold dome or mosaic of the Madonna and Child or bell tower, the chapel was no northern Italian basilica. Roth­ko acc­ept­ed the doct­rin­al context of the ch­apel and allowed the 14 Stat­ions of the Cross on the ex­ter­ior wall.
                                  
When the dedication of the chapel occurred in 1971, an interfaith service signified the official opening.
 
Buddhists

In his early 60s, Mark worked on the Rothko Chapel for 3 years so that he could feel the immersive experience he was seek­ing. His dark paintings con­t­ained dark texture effects. The hues varied, de­p­ending on the light in­t­ens­ity, so the paint­ings were different for every visitor. The human emot­ion expres­sed in the different colour values were devel­op­ed from lay­ered pig­ments, a charged quality that forced aud­iences to ex­am­ine their own emotions.. and made them cry.

Rothko privately sensed a chance to probe feelings that he admitted had been shaped by Jewish experiences of trauma and transcendence. He said that working within the norms of a Christian space was not a rejection of his heritage as much as the freedom to engage religion on his own terms.

The triptych was a medieval form invented to provide al­t­ar­­pieces illustrating generic crucifix­ions. So the chapel’s most patently Ch­ristian gesture was found in Rothko’s 3 nearly identical trip­tychs which encouraged the viewer’s dev­ot­ion­, as they would a tradit­ional Christ­ian al­tarpiece.

Dominique de Menil said the chapel was oriented toward the sacred, but it imposed no traditional environment. It offered a place where common orient­at­ion could be found, an orientation towards God and to man’s highest aspirations.

At a time when religious observance in the U.S was dec­lining, Rothko was betting on the rel­­evance of relig­ious art! He deliberately tried to harness the conventions of rel­ig­ious viewing, wanting the chapel paintings to be  approached with the fervour that a Last Judg­ment could induce. So Rothko invited viewers to approach his works with visual and spiritual expectations raised by Christian trad­ition; a resource not seen in Jewish art. In a middle-class part of Houston, on a quiet oak-lined street, the windowless Rothko Chapel was surrounded by a big lawn, a wall of ov­ergrown bamboo, and a reflecting pool with Barnett Newman’s imposing steel monument, Broken Ob­elisk. But the suite of Rothko paintings that lined the room was transformative.

Rothko hoped his works would create spiritual encount­ers, like the great old religious master pieces. Despite his enor­mous success by the mid-1960s, the chapel was giving Rothko his first opp­ort­unity to real­ise his late career goal. He wanted a circuit of per­manent paintings that would have a great visc­er­al impact on viewers.


In 1968 Rothko’s health deteriorated, and he became incr­easingly isolated. Rothko suicided in 1970, before the fin­al instal­lation of his 14 chap­el paint­ings. A year lat­er the Seagram murals were delivered to the chapel, lowered via the cupola and ins­tal­led for the opening. At the 1971 dedication, Domin­ique de Menil praised Rothko’s work for bringing viewers to the threshold of the divine. Since Rothko’s death, the Chapel has become a pilgrimage site, won by the artist’s willingness to probe human exper­ien­ce. Note the creation of the Rothko Chapel Óscar Rom­ero Award in recognition of courageous human rights advoc­acy and religious pluralism.

For 49 years, the light was never quite right
until the new skylight was created. 

After long consultation in 1999, the Rothko Chapel had a year of renovat­ions. For those drawn primarily by the chapel’s inter­faith and intercultural mission, the renovation was timely, gaining renewed art-historical im­p­or­tance. But I still ask: what would have led Mark Rothko, a non-practicing Jew, to work with the de Menils, who were motivated by their int­erest in ecumenical Christianity? They all wanted the chapel to become a place of peace, meditation and prayer! Today its board of directors is led by Roth­ko’s very clever son Dr Christopher Rothko, and the chapel is in con­stant use.

In his book Mark Rothko: From the Inside Out, Dr Rothko asked about the influence of Judaism on his fath­er’s art. Dad was the classic depressive Jew who was still open and honest about his Jewish soul-searching, whenever he was among his closest Jewish comrades. Rothko biographer Annie Cohen-Solal also examined Rothko’s re­lationship to Judaism in her book Mark Rothko: Toward the Light in the Chapel. She argued that throughout life, Mark remained connected to his father’s Orthodox Jewish ways and his own Talmudic education. Mark’s close friend poet Stanley Kunitz felt strongly that Rothko belonged to a great Judaic tradition, which was cen­t­ral to his art and life. It had to do with the sense of being! The best reference is by Aaron Rosen.

The Rothko Chapel, featuring the famous murals by painter Mark Rothko, closed after sustaining damage during Hurricane Beryl in 2024, now awaiting $30 million restoration.



20 comments:

  1. I had no idea why Rothko's paintings are so dark and difficult to see in your photos, but then I have never visited Texas. Brainly wrote that the dark and minimalistic nature of the paintings encouraged reflection. By reducing the visual distractions, Rothko was creating a meditative atmosphere where viewers could connect with their own spirituality. But did it happen?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deb
      That makes sense, but it seems like an endless amount of work for Rothko, with nothing much to see. At least from a distance.

      Delete
  2. Hi Hels
    I really enjoy Rothko and I think his work is beautiful and even moving because it taps into something basic and deeply-wired within ourselves ... but, for me, it does feels a bit disjointed/ for people (incl. Rothko) to shoehorn his work into some kind of religious or spiritual experience.
    It feels a bit too mystical to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Liam
      Rothko is normally full of colour and form. So now I wonder if the chapel Rothkos were his idea or the three architects'.

      Delete
  3. I didn't know Mark Rothko did a church design. I do like that plaza. The statue is quite interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Erika
      I suppose the complex was unpopular with half of the Houston community, so it will be interesting to see how they rebuild after the hurricane damage.

      Delete
  4. What a magnificent story on Rothko

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. roentare
      I thought I knew a lot about art and architecture (given limitations only by centuries and continents). But I have never seen anything like the Houston Chapel.
      Perhaps Rothko was showing his value when he invited viewers to approach his works with visual and spiritual expectations.

      Delete
  5. Never heard of him or his paintings, so found this post interesting and informative, thank you

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jo-Anne
      The biggest collection of Rothko's work is in the National Gallery of Art in Washington DC, if you get a chance to visit.

      Delete
  6. A tormented man. His art to me is dark.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Margaret
      Rothko was definitely tormented.
      But because the chapel was to became a ecumenical centre, it was designed to be open to all religions. Once it was a centre for international cultural, religious and philosophical exchanges, perhaps the darkness was to specifically show neutrality to all faiths.

      Delete
  7. The Rothko Chapel, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, closed in March 2019 for restoration, reopening in 2020. Renowned for its 14 monumental Mark Rothko canvases, the renovation enhanced the skylight, lighting, and entryway, aligning with the original design to improve the interaction with Rothko's art.
    During Hurricane Beryl, heavy rain and gale-force winds caused roof leaks, resulting in water damage to the ceiling and walls. Three of Mark Rothko’s panels have also been affected, to various degrees. Whitten & Proctor Fine Art Conservation has been engaged to assess the damage, with repair costs still undetermined.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ArchDaily
      what a dilemma :( Restored in 2019, greatly damaged by hurricane in 2024 and now facing years of debating about rebuilding and paying the costs.

      Do the Whitten & Proctor Fine Art Conservation people feel obligated to replace the original architecture and murals exactly? Or will there be a debate about what of the original plan could be improved?

      Delete
  8. Boa noite de quarta-feira. Obrigado pela visita e comentário. Não conhecia a história. Obrigado por dividir conosco.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luiz
      It may not be worth reading up on the damaged Chapel, but it would be worth locating Rothko's arts.

      Delete
  9. I remember the story of the restaurant paintings. They are now in Tate Modern in London but I see you mention that. It is a splendid setting for them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rachel
      You are quite right. The Tate reported that Rothko was commissioned to paint the murals for the fancy N.Y Four Seasons restaurant. He set to work, having constructed a scaffold in his studio to match the exact dimensions of the restaurant. But the murals were darker in mood than his previous work. Recognising that the worldly setting of a restaurant would not be the ideal location for such a work, Rothko withdrew from the commission and presented the series to the Tate Gallery.

      My question is: why did he accept a restaurant commission in the first place?

      Delete
  10. I would love to see this. Rothko is the favourite artist of one of my best friends, so I've known his work since my teens. Despite that, I knew neither that he was Jewish nor that he died by suicide.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mandy
      Good on you for being familiar with Rothko.
      Now is not a good time to see the Chapel because of Hurricane Beryl's damage, but I am confident-ish that the reconstruction will be loyal to the original design.
      I was closely aware of his cultural background but I was never confident about (anyone's) suicide and would not have included it in lectures.

      Delete