23 July 2024

Kenneth Clark's fine tv show: Civilisation

Stourton's book was published in 2017

I knew Kenneth Clark (1903-83) from watching his Civil­is­at­ion series on tv in 1969 and from his involvement with one of my favour­ite art historians Bern­ard Beren­son. And more recently I read Kenneth Clark: Life, Art and Civil­isation by James Stourton (Collins, 2016). 

Born in 1903 into a wealthy textile-based family, Clark progressed through Winchester and Oxford Uni, helped by supportive nannies and teachers. Then he was mentored by Bern­ard Beren­son in Flor­en­ce.

Stourton’s book analysed Clark’s mixed experiences. Clark was a product of the Edward­ian wealthy classes and by 28 he’d became Keeper of Fine Art at the Ashmolean. And King George V (1910-35) per­sonally encouraged Clark to become Keeper of the King’s Pict­ur­es. His classy family back­ground and education ensured a successful career.

Stourton analysed Clark’s emotional and intellectual contra­dictions. He loved his wife Jane (d1976) who had also read history at Ox­ford; they married in 1927 and had 3 children. Jane won his praise early on for her elegance and her role as a host­ess, despite her tem­p­er and booze. Meanwhile Clark’s mistresses fared no better than the wife. Independent women rarely appeared in Civil­isation, neither as creative art­ists nor as patrons. When a woman seemed unfitting, she was des­cr­ibed as an unstable spouse of a long-suffering husband who was forced to seek sol­ace else­where. Clark’s tv present­at­ion of women as objects of desire or insp­ir­ation was close to how his own women were portrayed.

The Civ­ilisation programme had focused largely on Europe, but Clark saw 2 big problems: 1]he loathed the megalomania of Vers­ail­les and wanted to exclude it from Civilisation and 2]the series avoid­ed Spain because it was still ruled by Franco. I Helen have another problem - why did BBC make a series that excluded the cul­tures of the Far East, In­dia, Africa and Central-South America? His omis­s­ions were not because of other cultures’ inferiority, but because of his ignorance. Yet de­spite the concentration on Europe, Clark’s tastes since child­hood had been far from Euro­cen­tric.

Clark became Director of the National Gal­lery in 1938. He had the National Gallery’s masterpieces evacuated to the Welsh mines; and he rein­vented the remaining gal­lery as a cultural centre in wartime Lon­don, including concerts and temporary exhibitions. And great acq­uisitions of art by Bosch, Rubens, Rembrandt, Hogarth and Ingres were protected. Yet the staff were almost ent­irely against him, which led to his re­signation as soon as the war ended.

Clark defined civilised values as moral virtues, using the Enlight­enment’s rationality and the Victorians’ human­itarianism as great examples. But con­trary evidence from his own life suggested that civilisation may have been imp­lic­ated in acquisitive vice.

Clark was laughed at for his uber-priv­il­eged background but he had a great range of expertise. Unlike other authors, Clark’s books were very readable documents, the most famous: Leon­ardo da Vinci 1939, Piero della Francesca 1951, The Nude 1956 and Feminine Beauty 1980. [Clark’s art hero John Ruskin also wrote very readably]. Many people did think Clark was arrogant and snobbish. Blushing at his own inher­it­ed privileges, Clark saw himself as a toff who’d been pro­moted to the status of a sage. So he did the right thing - he sec­retly depos­it­ed funds in the bank acc­ounts of artists who needed subsid­­ies.

In 1954 Clark accepted the chairmanship of the Independent Television Authority and, to the dismay of the BBC, defended the crud­ity of the new commercial channel. But Clark was a nat­ural on screen and he’d already made dozens of programmes for ITV.

Pazzi Chapel in one of the cloisters
in the complex of the Cathedra of Santa Croce, Florence
Expressing Renaissance values-peace, harmony, order, noble striving

Clark presented his history at a time when TV still had interest in educating and exciting millions. So TV history did not need to be uber-scholarly, but it had to express Clark’s love for the arts in clear English. He was Chancellor of the University of York from 1967-78. 

He was 66 when he made Civilisation. I don’t remember my opinion of Clark way back in Feb 1969, but in the first ep­is­ode he must have looked posh and con­fident. Although some were critical, the programme succeeded; Clark’s tv programme earned him a life peerage in 1969.

1968-9 was an awful time in human history, and Clark was afraid that western civilis­ation might vanish. His programme appeared while Czech­oslovakia was invaded, Vietnam’s wars intensified, civil unrest in Paris was chaotic and Martin Lut­her King was murdered. Sadly for Kenneth, his tough right-wing son Alan Clark became a Thatcher minister in 1983, the year Kenneth died.

Civilisation by Kenneth Clark
published in 1970

Clark studied da Vinci’s works in Royal Collection Windsor Castle,
and then Christ Mocked, by Hieronymus Bosch
The National Gallery

Despite criticisms, he was one of the most influent­ial figure in C20th British art. In 2014 The Tate organised "Ken­neth Clark: Looking for Civilisation", an exhibition that examined his role as a pat­ron, collector, art historian, public servant and popular broadcaster.

Read Michael Prodger, "In Defence of Civilisation", in History Today, 2014. Richard Nilsen, A Civilised TV series, 2014. And The Ideal Museum: Art Historian Kenneth Clark on the Formation of Western Institutions, in 1954 in ARTnews.




32 comments:

Rachel Phillips said...

I loved Civilisation. I watched the series a few years ago when I discovered it was available via an archive channel I had at the time. He was a man of his time who knew what he liked and he passed it on to those who were interested. There would never have been time to show every single piece of cultural heritage so he confined himself to what he liked and considered accessible in understanding to the ordinary person. He does come across as dated now in terms of presentation and some of his views but he was ahead of his time and set the ball rolling for many others to follow in his footsteps on television.

jabblog said...

At a time when there were fewer channels and less choice, more people might have been influenced by or exposed to his views. We have lost much in the mad scramble for more 'entertainment' at all hours of the day and night. Fortunately, there are many ways to access informative, educational series.

Margaret D said...

Haven't heard of the man Hels.
Interesting read and I continue to learn more from you - thank you.

Handmade in Israel said...

So interesting that he saved the National Gallery artworks during the war by evacuating them to the Welsh mines, yet he was still disliked by his staff.

Joe said...

I wonder if there was a published catalogue from when The Tate put on the exhibition "Ken­neth Clark: Looking for Civilisation"? Since Clark had passed away 31 years earlier, the 2014 show would have been targeted at people who had never seen his tv shows.

Jo-Anne's Ramblings said...

Never heard of the man o r the civilisation program but both sound interesting

roentare said...

I saw the name before. Thanks for your post that I learnt about this history.

Parnassus said...

Hello Hels, I have found that quite a few brilliant curators have strong and sometimes arrogant personalities that might get them disliked by some. The way to judge them is on their scholarship, intuition, and results, so Clark seems to have passed the test.
.
By coincidence, I am currently reading a book of art essays by the Australian critic Robert Hughes. Although his writing style is a bit dense, he certainly knows his onions, and is often able brilliantly to weave together historic information with his own intuitions. Although I think he lived in America and Europe when he wrote these essays, Australia was still close to his heart, and he gives many Australian examples and parallels in his studies of the great artists and the then-current art scene.
--Jim

My name is Erika. said...

I'm trying to remember what I read or watched by Kenneth Clark. I think it might have had something to do with art. I'm sure when it is about 2 AM I will wake up and it will come to me. :) Does that happen to you also?

mem said...

Honestly I do find it Viscerally difficult to get past his pompous ignorant and entitled treatment of women . It takes a real effort to appreciate him as a human . I do remember watching it when I was child and being enthralled .
Did You know that Bernard Berenson was Schiaparelli's daughters father in law ?? I know its a bit of a "who cares fact " but I guess it shows how concentrated these genes were / are

Hels said...

Rachel

Agreed. There would never have been enough time to show cultural heritages from all around the world and from different centuries. So I think you are correct in that he confined himself to what he knew best and what ordinary viewers would most appreciate. My only complaint was that the programme should have been called European Civilisation, if they knew in advance that the focus was going to be on Europe.

Hels said...

jabblog

the arrival of Foxtel was fortunate for me :) I now read the tv programme first thing in the morning and record JUST the series that are learned, historically fascinating and provide proper credits for me to follow up. DOCOS, BBC First, BBC 2, History, Discovery, Earth, Animal Planet, Real Life Medical etc. often have excellent material, including Civilisation and The Ascent of Man.

Hels said...

Margaret

To save having to locate the old tv series, you might like to read Kevin McMahon's 'When People Wanted Civilisation: Reassessing Kenneth Clark' in
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/when-people-wanted-civilisation-reassessing-kenneth-clark/

Hels said...

Handmade

When Clark was Director of the National Gal­lery just before WW2 erupted, he was _very_ wise in having the National Gallery’s masterpieces evacuated to the Welsh mines. And in having art by Bosch, Rubens, Rembrandt, Hogarth well protected.

If the staff disliked his style, it certainly wasn't because he saved the National Gallery's treasures from German bombing.

Hels said...

Joe

preferences in art, music, literature, tv programmes etc change every generation or two. So whereas people were passionate about Art Nouveau from 1880 until 1910, the Deco artists and fans from WW1 on wouldn't touch oldfashioned and weak Art Nouveau with a barge pole.

And when two new generations of people saw the Tate Exhibition in 2014, they curators would have had a lot of historical explaining to do. So the Tate catalogue was important: https://www.tate.org.uk/press/press-releases/kenneth-clark-looking-civilisation

Hels said...

Jo-Anne

even if you had seen the series back in 1969, our brains have softened since then and some memories have fallen out. In fact had to read Kenneth Clark: Life, Art and Civil­isation by James Stourton a few years ago, to remind myself of the 1969 programme.

Hels said...

Parnassus

have a look at BBC Kenneth Clark's Civilisation, Episode 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMpoGi1MckQ
If you see it as scholarly, then you will really enjoy seeing the rest of the episodes.
If you see it as arrogant and snobbish, then one episode will certainly have been enough.

Robert Hughes' history series on tv were very understandable and popular here. But unfortunately I am not a fan of modern art, so I didn't not enjoy The Shock of the New.

Hels said...

mem

Bernard Berenson was born in Lithuania in 1865 without very much money. So he would have been very happy to marry in the US or UK into class.

I cannot find anything about Bernard Berenson's relationship to Schiaparelli's daughter's father in law. But Mary Berenson had two daughters with her _first_ husband Frank Costelloe. Mary became related to the Bloomsbury Group of English stars: one daughter married Adrian Stephen, Virginia Woolf's brother, and the other married Oliver Strachey, Lytton Strachey’s brother. How cool is that?

Ирина Полещенко said...

Thank you, dear Helen, for your interesting story!

hels said...

Irina
Every culture has had to deal with changing tastes, training, skills, incomes, fans, publicity and government support. It is interesting to see how Clark coped, and how his community coped.

mem said...

So I have checked this out apparently Bernard Berenson was the great uncle of Gogo Schiapparelli 's first husband whose name was also Berenson . Not as close as I had supposed.

Hels said...

mem

thank you. It is always important to have famous people you can invite to your weddings and family dinner parties, even if they are distant cousins :)

Gattina said...

I never heard of him, in 68 and 69 I fell in love with my husband and we married in 69. It was normal that during this time I only had hearts in my eyes !

Hels said...

Gattina,
I met my then boyfriend, now husband in 1969 also :) But two things saved my passion for cultural history. Firstly we were both undergraduate university students still, so I had to pay attention to Civilisation and similar tv series. Secondly he lived in Sydney and I lived in Melbourne, 900 ks away. As there was no computer connection back then, and long distance phone calls were too expensive, I focused on getting good uni results all year.

Luiz Gomes said...

Boa tarde e uma excelente quinta-feira. Obrigado pela excelente matéria e explicações. Aproveito para desejar um bom final de semana.

Liam Ryan said...

Hi Hels
Thanks for the youtube link to Ken Clark's documentary series on youtube. I will watch it.
For me, I really love Robert Hughes. I was quite sad to see of his passing a few years back. For a time when I was younger, I even tried to mimic his Aussie accent (which to my ears, sounded a little bit patrician).
I enjoy Alastair Sooke, and especially Simon Schama.
I really cannot stomach John Berger too much as I think he squeezes Marxism into his analysis. But that was probably the fashion at that time.

"Clark presented his history at a time when TV still had interest in educating and exciting millions."

TV standards were so much better than today. The entire linguistic register was significantly higher than today and people were expected to have a much broader knowledge base. I was recently reading some Tom Paine and I was astonished (in the introduction) to find out that in his day Paine was attacked for his "plebian" or common-day vernacular and prose style. And yet, today, his prose would be deemed ornate and "posh".

Hels said...

Luiz
Many thanks. I hope you can get access to the tv series. Kenneth Clark: Life, Art and Civil­isation by James Stourton is also excellent.

Hels said...

Liam
When I lived in Israel for 3 years, our neighbours were all South Africans. I too wanted to speak in English with their unique accent, and managed reasonably well. For a short time.

Simon Schama specialises in the very subjects I taught: art history, Dutch history, Jewish history and other European histories. Not only are his tv documentaries wonderful; so are his books. You have good taste :)

Hels said...

Years ago I didn't think that blogging would provide many references to excellent films, books, tv series etc and historical material. But sometimes wonderful material appears and I too am grateful.

Hels said...

Erika
I had a great memory until Covid and retirement, and since then even material that I knew well takes ages to pop into my brain. So I am with you! The art historian Kenneth Clarke explored the evolution of Western culture from the collapse of Rome to the Romantics.

Hilary Melton-Butcher said...

Hi Hels - I came across this again recently ... and started to watch - when the autumn and winter comes I must finish the series ... thanks for the reminder - cheers Hilary

Hels said...

Hilary
it is fascinating to think about re-reading old books and re-viewing old tv series. Since 1969, research has produced new findings, nations have changed and cultures appeal to citizens differently. So I will be keen to hear how you find the old series now, in 2024.