Capt Cook's Cottage
transplanted brick by brick to Melbourne in 1934
Navigator-explorer Capt James Cook (1728-79) never lived in the cottage when his parents James and Grace built it in 1755 in Great Ayton village, North Yorkshire. [1755 was inscribed in the cottage’s stone-work]. The lad had started his sea-faring apprenticeship in that year, even though he’d have stayed with his parents on trips home, enjoying fishing in the River Leven. So this connection to the Cook family home was enough to link the cottage and young James.
Leap forward to June 1933, when Great Ayton villagers crammed into the Buck Hotel for the auction for Cooks’ Cottage. The house’s legacy of being connected, however distantly, to one of Britain’s most famous explorers meant that many people arrived to witness its fate. Originally Cooks’ Cottage had been placed under strict conditions that any buyer could not remove the building from England, although this was later waived at the auction. Later the Yorkshire cottage was sold to Melbourne scientist and philanthropist Sir Russell Grimwade for £800.
Even in the 1930s, not everyone was happy about Cooks’ Cottage being removed from its Great Ayton site. Some locals complained that the house belonged to British history. Others were excited for the move, seeing it as a strengthened tie between the two British nations.
Then there was the job of dismantling the cottage. Each beam, rafter, flagstone and brick was individually numbered as it was painstakingly removed and placed into 253 wooden crates. Attention to detail was important: only the modern parts of the house were left behind eg a fireplace inglenook that had been built after the Cooks left. The crates were taken by a fleet of lorries to a train which delivered them to the port of Hull. There the Commonwealth and Dominion Liner Port Wellington was waiting.
The ship left port in Feb, carrying 16,851 ks from the Cook Cottage to Australia. A site in the Fitzroy Gardens was selected to rebuild the cottage, where it went up brick-by-brick and opened to the public to mark Melbourne’s 100th centenary 1934. Construction work was completed in 6 months then the cottage was handed over to the Lord Mayor by Grimwade in Oct 1934 in time for the centenary ceremony. Combining modern interpretations of Capt Cook's adventures, original furniture, a lovely English cottage garden, volunteers in C18th costumes and a new museum in the stable. The Cottage was perfect when I visited (1958).
The loss of Cooks’ Cottage to Great Ayton was quickly remedied with a gift from the Australian government. An obelisk now stands on the original site of Capt Cook’s Cottage, made out of Point Hicks granite. NB this was the first land Cook aw on his 1770 Australian trip!
So why was the cottage erected in the Fitzroy Gardens if Cook was never in Melbourne? Partially because the area was surrounded by large shady European trees, historian Linda Young noted that journalist Hermon Gill created a Cook–Melbourne connection. It was argued that the first Australian coastline, observed by Cook’s 1770 expedition, was here. Since Melbourne was about to mark 100 years of settlement in 1934, Gill suggested that Melbourne was the proud guardian of the cottage of the man who had made the centenary possible! It’s now a museum to colonial history.
As the cottage structure had been altered considerably by a succession of British owners following the Cook family's occupation, its Australian assemblers had to restore the cottage as accurately as records would permit to its mid C18th appearance.
But before it had even been moved, there were discussions in Melbourne about where to rebuild Cook’s cottage. Some citizens didn’t want an unpretentious little building without any architectural value stuck beside the stately national buildings in Swanston St. But by the time Cooks’ Cottage appeared in Fitzroy Gardens in Oct 1934, the public seemed to have warmed to the building: a large crowd watched the centennial ceremony. Mrs Dixon of Great Ayton presented the original key of the cottage to Grimwade.
Today, Cooks’ Cottage remains open, looking very much like it did back in Great Ayton in the 1700s. The exterior shows a reddish brown brick cottage, reminiscent of many in the English countryside, complete with a customised, traditional English garden. The herb and vegetable garden behind the house has been planted as it would have been at the time. In C18th, families relied on home-grown produce for their food supply. Poultry shared the space with vegetables, mixed fruits and flowers. Most families had a good knowledge of herbs uses for cooking and medicine, using them to cure illnesses and injuries. Cook prevented scurvy in his crews by including scurvy grass/New Zealand spinach and sauerkraut.
Critique
Recently the Capt Cook story is coming under criticism. The cottage was one of a few colonial monuments vandalised on Australia Day, as public opinion of the once legendary Capt Cook changed; more details of his interactions with First Nations people have emerged. Some First Nations people described the cottage as an oppressive space with a lack of information about the illegal treatment of Indigenous Australians by white settlers. Opponents pulled down statues of Capt Cook because the statues presented an image of heroism within the colonial narrative, without recognising the colonial violence that these men promoted and committed.
The English garden that accompanies Capt Cook’s House was designed before the cottage’s reconstruction here, and the sweet peas, hollyhocks, mignonettes and other English flowers were NOT grown in Yorkshire. Rather they came from nurseries in Melbourne. Only the ivy that climbs on the exterior walls was brought from Great Ayton along with the dismantled house, still living in the warm soil.
Fortunately the cottage has undergone two restorations. The first was in the late 1950s and the second in 1978, when a thorough effort was made to investigate and restore the building, furnish it with contemporary C18th materials, and surround it with an C18th garden.
Photo credits: ralwaightravel
So why was the cottage erected in the Fitzroy Gardens if Cook was never in Melbourne? Partially because the area was surrounded by large shady European trees, historian Linda Young noted that journalist Hermon Gill created a Cook–Melbourne connection. It was argued that the first Australian coastline, observed by Cook’s 1770 expedition, was here. Since Melbourne was about to mark 100 years of settlement in 1934, Gill suggested that Melbourne was the proud guardian of the cottage of the man who had made the centenary possible! It’s now a museum to colonial history.
As the cottage structure had been altered considerably by a succession of British owners following the Cook family's occupation, its Australian assemblers had to restore the cottage as accurately as records would permit to its mid C18th appearance.
But before it had even been moved, there were discussions in Melbourne about where to rebuild Cook’s cottage. Some citizens didn’t want an unpretentious little building without any architectural value stuck beside the stately national buildings in Swanston St. But by the time Cooks’ Cottage appeared in Fitzroy Gardens in Oct 1934, the public seemed to have warmed to the building: a large crowd watched the centennial ceremony. Mrs Dixon of Great Ayton presented the original key of the cottage to Grimwade.
Statue of Capt Cook in
the herb garden behind the cottage
Guides in 18th century clothes
Today, Cooks’ Cottage remains open, looking very much like it did back in Great Ayton in the 1700s. The exterior shows a reddish brown brick cottage, reminiscent of many in the English countryside, complete with a customised, traditional English garden. The herb and vegetable garden behind the house has been planted as it would have been at the time. In C18th, families relied on home-grown produce for their food supply. Poultry shared the space with vegetables, mixed fruits and flowers. Most families had a good knowledge of herbs uses for cooking and medicine, using them to cure illnesses and injuries. Cook prevented scurvy in his crews by including scurvy grass/New Zealand spinach and sauerkraut.
Critique
Recently the Capt Cook story is coming under criticism. The cottage was one of a few colonial monuments vandalised on Australia Day, as public opinion of the once legendary Capt Cook changed; more details of his interactions with First Nations people have emerged. Some First Nations people described the cottage as an oppressive space with a lack of information about the illegal treatment of Indigenous Australians by white settlers. Opponents pulled down statues of Capt Cook because the statues presented an image of heroism within the colonial narrative, without recognising the colonial violence that these men promoted and committed.
The English garden that accompanies Capt Cook’s House was designed before the cottage’s reconstruction here, and the sweet peas, hollyhocks, mignonettes and other English flowers were NOT grown in Yorkshire. Rather they came from nurseries in Melbourne. Only the ivy that climbs on the exterior walls was brought from Great Ayton along with the dismantled house, still living in the warm soil.
Fortunately the cottage has undergone two restorations. The first was in the late 1950s and the second in 1978, when a thorough effort was made to investigate and restore the building, furnish it with contemporary C18th materials, and surround it with an C18th garden.
Photo credits: ralwaightravel
I saw the cottage when I visited Melbourne in 2012. I wondered what it was doing there but never did the research so this post clears up the mystery I had completely forgotten until now.
ReplyDeleteHi Hels - fascinating alignment of thoughts ... we had a talk on Captain Cook yesterday for our history group. You've updated a few snippets to the story ... one thing that you don't mention ... is apparently that the 'codicil' to Cook's will stated that the cottage had to remain in 'England' ... was changed to 'Empire' ... so it could be sold and moved to Melbourne. Cheers - interesting post ... Hilary
ReplyDeleteFun60
ReplyDeleteI also visited the 1755 cottage on a primary school excursion, presumably because British and Australian histories were so important to us in the 1950s. But no-one even knew to ask "what the cottage was doing there?" The reasons I added in the post above were presumably rationales recorded centuries later i.e after 1933-4.
It is still a great story now.
I can understand the anger directed at Captain Cook. But the carnage first nation people suffered is nothing unique an experience to them but happening everywhere in the human history. Wars create winners and losers.
ReplyDeleteHilary
ReplyDeleteI wonder if that could be correct. Cook died in 1779 and any codicil to his Cook's will, eg in which country the cottage had to remain, would not have had any standing once the cottage was sold to other families many decades after the last Cook died.
The controversary continued even at the cottage's auction in the UK in 1933. Half the Yorkshire population was annoyed about Cooks’ Cottage being removed from its Great Ayton site. You must come to Melbourne - I will take you to the cottage as a special visitor :)
roentare
ReplyDeletevery true that. But it wasn't a war in the usual sense of the word; it was more the normal course of colonisation in someone else's country. Brutal but it was the natural right of old world countries in "apparently empty, New World countries".
The Digital Classroom said that Cook only landed in two places in Australia, briefly at that: Botany Bay and Possession Island in Torres Strait. He was also forced to stop over at Endeavour River in Nth Qld, after the Endeavour ran aground.
ReplyDeleteIt seems an extraordinary undertaking to remove a cottage from one country to another and expensive, too. It must look quite bizarre, though interesting.
ReplyDeleteJoseph
ReplyDeleteIt seems that Capt Cook was very wise not roaming around somebody else's land without permission. But a total of just a few days on land didn't really give him much claim to having discovered Australia.
I am very glad that Australia was colonised by the British, of all European or Asian powers, but the involuntary takeover of First Nations peoples leaves an anger still today that still needs to be addressed.
Hi Hels - maybe my dating (as such) isn't correct - the waiver was made so the cottage could be moved to Australia. The other thing is - his widow lived another 56 years .. while his six children had all predeceased them both. Thanks for the offer of the visit - I'd love to ... but can't see it happening - sadly. Cheers Hilary
ReplyDeletejabblog
ReplyDeleteIt was so important that Melbourne scientist and philanthropist Sir Russell Grimwade get Captain Cook's cottage to Australia, I think he would have spent even more than £800 to buy the house and then however much extra it took to ship it out and re-establish it here. Strengthening the tie between the motherland (UK) and the ex-colony (Aus) was his top priority.
It worked on me in the 1950s :)
Hilary
ReplyDeleteI cannot imagine the endless pain in Elizabeth Cook having had a good husband and 6 children, then finding herself totally alone in the world. Not even a single grandchild :( She received an annual pension of £200 from the Admiralty, but she must have struggled alone.
Hello Hels, Both the Cook house and landscaping are charming and show what can be done with houses on a smaller scale, which is of so much interest right now. (I am referring to the way it looks now, and not just the moving of a building.)
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of taking apart houses, there was a pioneer stone house in Ohio that was in the way, but when preservationists tried to save it, all they got was a promise to carefully dismantle and number the stones, so the house could be re-erected elsewhere. You can probably guess the result--there was no immediate taker, and over the years some of the stones started to disappear. I am not sure what eventually happened, but I am pretty sure that Ohio is now minus one early stone dwelling.
--Jim
I totally enjoyed this post, this is they type of old house I would enjoying visiting, the man did some good did some not so good and maybe even some down right bad shit but that happens when one is human, no one is perfect
ReplyDeleteIt is fascinating that the building was transported such a long way to a foreign land.
ReplyDeleteThe destruction historical items and buildings leads us to forget the past and make the same mistakes again. A never ending cycle of growth and destruction.
Cherry
ReplyDeleteYou are correct... whenever the destruction continues. If a site has historic, cultural or architectural importance, it is immoral to pull it down. And if the site has heritage protection, then pulling it down is illegal as well.
Perhaps moving the cottage 16,500 ks from Yorkshire to Victoria turned out to be a good move. I was heartbroken when the 1880s Federal Coffee Palace/temperance hotel in the centre of Melbourne was demolished in the 1970s.
Parnassus
ReplyDeletepulling apart a pioneer stone house and numbering/wrapping each stone one at a time is very time consuming, very expensive and usually not supported by the entire community. I am not surprised that your Ohio example did not succeed in being dismantled, moved and protected properly.
Jo-Anne
ReplyDeleteCaptain Cook was a talented, educated man, but a man of his times, yes. Clearly he didn't get consent from the resident populations to put Europeans on Australian land, and he shot native men on their own land.
But some things he did brilliantly. Cook travelled right around New Zealand, for example, completely surveying that previously little known nation. All his scientific work in the South Pacific made him and the Navy deservedly famous.
Interesting reminder of the history of Australia Hels. Visited the cottage and area in 1961 and from memory enjoyed it. We have also stayed at 1770 on the east coast for a few nights exploring that area.
ReplyDeleteHe was indeed a clever man and we can't change history.
I have visited the house and museum and thought it strange ti be in Melbourne so thanks for the explanation. Personally, I feel it should have been left in Yorkshire. IT represents more of English history than Australian, especially as Young James hardly ever lived there.
ReplyDeleteI can understand First Nation people being upset with the British taking their land but vandalising statues and the house hardly helps their cause.
Margaret
ReplyDeleteNot only can we not _change_ history, it would be equally inappropriate to _quietly delete_ historical truths. The role of a morale nation is to examine our history in detail, find the deliberate and the accidental mistakes, and ensure that they are avoided for ever into the future. Captain Cook was a very clever man, but when I talk about learning from history, I am addressing myself to today's politicians, authors, school teachers etc etc.
diane
ReplyDeletewhen protesters destroy public buildings, art, gardens or any other community treasure, they are imposing their values on the community without consultation, court permission or police protection for the victims. If they want a sculpture of Captain Cook taken down from a public space, they need to negotiate with the National Gallery of Victoria (for example) to take the statue into the special 18th century section of the precious collection.
Is amazing this structure.
ReplyDeleterv
ReplyDeleteTrue! And particularly amazing since this 1755 building was later pulled apart, shipped across the world, reconstructed and later restored twice.
I love this little cottage for a number of reasons. The first is that many of the people who came to Australia after European settlement would have come from humble homes like this one . Its is an indicator of where we come from and who we are and maybe the values which have made us a more equal place ( although this is debatable) .
ReplyDeleteThe second reason is the reminder that we don't have to live in huge spaces. This little cottage inspired my mum who bought a tiny bluestone rubble cottage in Geelong about 40 years ago and slowly and very carefully restored it . It has been her very loved home for all these years . It was built in 1850 by Geelong's first clerk of works . Mum kept in mind the simplicity of the Cook cottage as she worked on her house.
I absolutely understand The indigenous attitude to cook and the sadness of what followed At the same time this man was and is the worlds greatest sailor His achievements are a miracle of bravery and endurance and it is for that reason that he should be lorded . His treatment of the " Natives" was probably awful in keeping with blind racism of his time and should'nt be forgot but my goodness his achievement in navigation and exploration were amazing .
It looks very pretty from the outside, but the inside is quite tiny as most homes were back then I'd guess. Not much room to swing a broom.
ReplyDeletemem
ReplyDeleteCaptain Cook's parents did not earn an enormous amount of money, so I imagine that this was the loveliest cottage that they could have afforded. Dad was a farm worker who had to house, feed, educate and protect eight children. They were very wise in growing enough food, and catching enough fish to eat decently.
I think your mum was very wise in copying the Cooks' example in having a modest, restored and comfortable home, perfect for her own needs and not for the royal family.
River
ReplyDeleteyou are quite right,... the cottage in Melbourne is attractive from outside, but it a bit small inside for our tastes. However this was true in most countries, I imagine. My dad was one of 7 siblings in his inner Melbourne home in the 1920s and 30s, and when his mother was put into a TB asylum, the children had to be fostered out to the aunts and uncles. They shared beds with their first cousins.
We need to find a decent medium level of space for ordinary families... not a squishy prison cell and not Buckingham Palace.
I don't really approve of buildings being moved like that. The cottage should have stayed exactly where it belonged. You have given my hometown a mention though! I come from the port of Hull. I am originally a Yorkshire lass.
ReplyDeleteHandmade
ReplyDeletethe cultural and historical importance of a building comes from a number of factors, including its exact location and its surrounding environment. So moving the cottage _did_ cut it off from a lot of its importance. However destroying the cottage totally, or converting it into a MacDonald's, would have been much worse.
Re your Hull origins, I am very good at identifying various British accents but I didn't detect it in your written comments :)
Handmade
ReplyDeletethe only truly famous, important person I know from Hull was William Wilberforce. He truly changed the world.
Boa tarde de Sexta-feira e bom final de semana minha querida amiga. Tenho mais fotos da influência da arquitetura italiana no Rio de Janeiro Janeiro.
ReplyDelete