20 June 2026

Edgar Degas, impressionist or modernist?

Edgar Degas (1834-1917) was born in Paris, son of banker Augustin De Gas. At 11 Degas enrolled in Lycée Louis-le-Grand, graduating in 1853. He was painting seriously and by 18, his bedroom became an artist's studio. He began making copies in the Louvre, but his father wanted him to study. So Degas enrolled in Law at Paris Uni in Nov 1853 but was bored. In 1855, Degas met Jean Auguste Ingres whom he revered. In Ap that year, Degas enrolled at Ecole des Beaux-Arts, where he studied drawing & flourished. In Jul 1856 Degas moved to Italy for 3 years, copying Renaissance art.

After returning home, Degas continued copying paintings at the Louvre, still remained a keen copyist. He first exhibited at the Salon in 1865, when the jury accepted his painting Scene of War in the Middle Ages, attracting little attention. Although he exhibited annually in the Salon for 4 years, he submitted no more history paintings; his Steeplechase: The Fallen Jockey (1866 Salon) signalled a new commitment to modernity. The change in his art was influenced by Édouard Manet who he met in the Louvre.

Degas, Cotton Office in New Orleans, 
1873, Wiki
`
When the Franco-Prussian War erupted in 1870, Degas enlisted in the National Guard, defending Paris. During rifle training, his eyes were damaged. Post-war Degas enjoyed a long stay (from 1872) in New Orleans LA where his brother René and other relatives lived. One of Degas' New Orleans works, Cotton Exchange at New Orleans, won positive notice in France. Note it was his only work purchased by a museum during his lifetime!

Impressionism emerged in the 1860s, and grew in part from the realism of men like Courbet and Corot. The Impressionists painted the world's realities using notable colours, concentrating mainly on light effects. Degas hurt the Impressionists when he constantly belittled their en plein air art. He was anti-Impressionism, just like the critics who reviewed their shows, saying: What I do is the result of reflection and of the study of the great masters; I know nothing of spontaneity. See his Parisian scenes, off-centre compositions, experiments with colour & form, and friendship with key Impressionists.

Degas returned to Paris in 1873. Alas his father died and in settling the estate, it was found that brother René had amassed huge business debts. To preserve the family name, Degas had to sell his house and a collection of art he’d inherited. He suddenly found himself dependent on his own art sales for income. By now very unhappy with the Salon, Degas joined forces with young artists who were organising an Independent Art Society. Their first Impressionist Exhibitions started in 1874,  and they later held 7 additional shows until 1886.

Degas’ distinct style showed his respect for the old masters and his admiration for Ingres and Eugène Delacroix. And he liked the vigorous realism of popular illustrators. When he became famous for horses and dancers, his treatment of traditional historical subjects became less idealised. Degas already showed the mature style that he would later develop more, by cropping subjects awkwardly and by choosing unusual views. By late 1860s, Degas had shifted from his initial history paintings to contemporary life.
 
The artist organised the shows and displayed his style in all of them, despite conflicting with other group members. He had little in common with Monet & other landscape artists whom he mocked for painting outside. Conservative socially, he disliked the scandal created by the shows, plus the publicity that his colleagues sought. He rejected the name Impressionist that the press popularised, and his insistence on having traditional artists in the shows annoyed the group, disbanding in 1886. As his financial situation improved via selling his own works, he was keen to collect works by old masters eg El Greco, and moderns eg Manet, Pissarro, Cézanne, Gauguin and Van Gogh. Loved artists, Ingres & Delacroix, were well represented.

The Ballet Class, c1875
Wiki

The Dancing Class, 1870s
The French Desk

Degas became isolated, due partly to his belief that an artist could have no personal life. The Dreyfus Affair (1894->) brought his anti-Semitism to the fore and he separated from all his Jewish friends. His interest in portraiture led him to study the ways in which peoples’ social stature and employment type were revealed in their features, posture & dress. In Portraits At the Stock Exchange 1879, he anti-Semitically showed a group of Jewish businessmen. With his athletic dancers and solid laundresses painting, he revealed their occupations by their dress, activities and body type.

His subject matter & his technique changed. The dark palette displaying Dutch art’s influence gave way to colour use and bold brush strokes. Place de la Concorde 1875 “froze” to portray them accurately, seeing movement. The changes to his palette, brushwork & composition displayed the influence that both Impressionism’s & photography’s natural images had.

Jockeys, 1881
all that's good

Race horses, 1884

While visiting a childhood friend in Normandy, Degas made his first studies of horses. Then his treatment of traditional historical subjects became idealised. Degas did racing scenes throughout his career, using his horses and jockeys from one picture to the next. All the figures had been in earlier works and some of the poses were quite distinguished. The prancing mount and rider derived from Benozzo Gozzoli's Journey in the Palazzo Medici-Riccardi Florence, which Degas copied earlier. Yet this picture was unusual for its medium—pastel, colouring the sky and landscape, & giving a warm undertone in front. Race course scenes allowed Degas to depict horses and riders in a modern context.

Laundry Girls Ironing, 1884
WikiArt

When he painted working women eg milliners & laundresses, his treatment of traditional historical subjects became less idealised. Portrait of Mlle Fiocre in Ballet La Source, in the 1868 Salon, was his first major work to introduce his favourite models: dancers. In many later paintings, dancers were shown backstage or rehearsing, focusing on their status as working professionals. Degas also began to paint café life. He urged other artists to paint real life instead of traditional mythological or historical art, and his few literary scenes were modern. By the later 1870s Degas had mastered not only the traditional oils, but also pastels. The dry medium enabled him to reconcile his interest in line and in expressive colour. In the mid-1870s he returned to etching and less traditional printmaking.

These changes in media engendered the paintings that Degas produced in later life. Degas drew and painted women drying themselves with towels, combing their hair and bathing. The backgrounds were simplified.

Except for his skilled draftsmanship and obsession with figures, his later work bore little resemblance to his early era. Ironically the works created after the heyday of the Impressionist movement that most obviously used the colouristic techniques of Impressionism. Certain features of Degas's work remained for life. He always painted indoors, working IN his studio using models. The figure remained his primary subject; his landscapes were produced from memory or imagination. His works were prepared, calculated, practised and developed in stages.

Public reception of Degas' work included both admiration to contempt. As a promising artist in the conventional mode, Degas had a few works accepted in the Salon in the early years. These works received praise from some French critics. But Degas soon joined forces with the Impressionists and rejected the rigid rules, judgements, and elitism of the Salon. The Salon initially rejected the experimentalism of the Impressionists!

Degas' work was controversial, but in time it was admired for its draftsmanship. The nudes Degas exhibited in the 8th Impressionist Exhibition in 1886 produced "the most concentrated body of critical writing on the artist in his lifetime. ... The overall reaction was positive and laudatory." Little Dancer of Fourteen Years was probably his most controversial piece, with some critics said they saw ugliness.

He was a key artist late in life, esp by his great admirer Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec; it was his lively creation of daily activities and his bold colours that urged him into late Impressionism. But his paintings, pastels, drawings & sculptures weren’t intended for exhibition. Degas had no formal pupils, although he did influence painters like Mary Cassatt & Walter Sickert. He was working more, only ceasing his art in 1912. With demolition of his home, he spent the last years of his life, single and nearly blind, wandering Paris streets. Degas died in 1917. His paintings were discovered only after post-death, now prominently displayed in important museums.





20 comments:

  1. It always saddens me when I hear artists didn't get much praise until after they died.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. diane
      whenever a young artist, musician, medical researcher or author breaks into the traditional world with new ideas or techniques, it is likely that the "respectable" critics go into shock.
      Vincent Van Gogh didn't manage to sell a single work of his in his entire life to anyone, other than one to his brother Theo for food and accommodation. Johannes Vermeer was OK when alive, but the Dutch master died deeply in debt, leaving behind a starving widow and 11 children. Italian Amedeo Modigliani painter lived in extreme poverty in Paris. Ill and alcoholic, he died at 36 without ever seeing his art achieve commercial success.
      Too radical for their new eras?

      Delete
  2. I get the impression he wasn't a very likeable fellow, with a rather sad end to his life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrew
      I got very mixed feelings from Degas. His mother died when he was very young and he never had a wife or children. So there was little softness in his life.

      Smithsonian Magazine said Degas' exhibitions reminded everyone just how daring the artist was in creating them. He defied traditional composition, choosing asymmetry and radical viewpoints; and he rubbed pastels over his monotype prints, creating drama. Yet he always managed to keep an eye on the great masters of the past.

      His friend poet Paul Valéry described him as “divided against himself; on the one hand driven by an acute preoccupation with truth, eager for all the newly introduced felicitous ways of seeing things and of painting them; on the other hand possessed by a rigorous spirit of classicism, to whose principles of elegance, simplicity and style he devoted a lifetime of analysis.”


      It sounded very painful, changing and contradictory.

      Delete
  3. I do like real life paintings, the ballet dancers and women ironing are very nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. River
      portraits were common and popular, but they were almost always of royals, popes and bishops, noble landowners and other VERY famous people. Seeing ordinary working families in C17th Dutch art was heart warming. Seeing mothers and babies in C19th French art was even easier to understand.

      Delete
  4. Loved the ballet and horse painting Hels. What a shame his paintings were not noticed until after his death, so many artists being the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Margaret
      It didn't pay to break with tradition in any of the creative areas of learning, did it? Some were brave, progressive thinkers, who tried to change the world.

      Paul Gauguin had at least 8 children: five with his Danish wife, and some in France and Polynesia. Despite his artistic skills, did the wives and children ever live in comfort and with paternal care? Perhaps he was just a neglectful man :(

      Delete
  5. Great essay on Degas life, thank you. I have always enjoyed his work.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Patricia
    I always enjoyed Degas' work as well, but then I didn't realise back in our student days that the respectable art world of the mid C19th might have been very different.
    The Impressionists lived in an age of photography and electricity, and had to turn to aspects of modern life. But to what? slums, brothels and horse races, or family life, quality food and cultural activities.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A fascinating and complex figure, Edgar Degas combined classical discipline with modern vision, leaving a legacy of extraordinary artistic innovation that remains inseparable from the contradictions and prejudices of his character.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. roentare
      modern vision and artistic innovation arrive every time a new style emerges - eg Romanesque to Gothic, and Renaissance changed to Baroque and then to Classical. Regardless of critical and public receptions, some artists and architects never left their own style, some left it reluctantly and others progressed as quickly as they could.
      Thus Degas' legacy was essential to his uncertain contemporaries and to those who followed.

      Delete
  8. Knowing nothing about his life and background, it was an informative and interesting read for me. It is always a shame that an artist and his artwork is not really appreciated until after his death. Also interesting that he was such a strong anti semite and actually separated himself from his Jewish friends.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. gluten Free
      France was town apart by the Alfred Dreyfus Affair, the Jewish General Staff officer who was convicted of high treason. There was no evidence to show at his trial, but the country was divided between a reactionary right, (Armed Forces and the Catholic Church); and the liberal republicans. Claude Monet, Jacob Camille Pissarro, Paul Signac, Louis Vuitton and Mary Cassatt supported Zola. Paul Cézanne, Pierre-Auguste Renoir and especially Degas wanted Dreyfus to be punished.

      When the entire affair was found to be a miscarriage of justice and anti-Semitism. Dreyfus was exonerated and pardoned following 5 imprisoned years on Devil’s Island, French Guiana. So why did Degas continue his hatred?

      Delete
  9. Boa noite minha querida amiga Helen. Obrigado pela excelente aula de história. Nunca ouvi falar desse, maravilhoso pintor. Uma excelente noite de sábado, na Austrália, bom final de semana e um grande abraço do seu amigo carioca.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Luiz
      ahh you must read the history of French art, particularly between 1860-1900. Degas was influential in France of course, but his movement was influential across the modern world.
      I don't agree with everything Richard Thomson wrote, but you might find "The Presence of the Past in French Art, 1870–1905: Modernity and Continuity," Yale UP, 2021 useful.

      Delete
  10. Hello Hels, I was sorry to read about Degas's anti-semitism--to the point that he rejected his Jewish friends. It is not too surprising to hear that about someone from France, but still it makes me admire him and his work a lot less, and I feel less sympathetic about the troubled spots in his life. That is the problem with reading about people you basically admire--you discover their negative aspects as well.

    I remember seeing a Degas exhibit in Taipei. Not too many masterpieces, but some of his early Louvre copies which were interesting and a bronze ballerina, along with a sprinkling of his more famous paintings.
    --Jim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Parnassus
      Dylan Oxley wrote "Appreciate the Art but Despise the Artist?"
      https://thedriptray.substack.com/p/can-we-enjoy-good-art-by-bad-people

      He said of course we can, then said "The real question is whether we should, specifically if an unethical artist deserves praise". I read Charles Dickens in high school, but once his brutal behaviour to his wife and 10 children was revealed, I never touched a book of his again.

      Delete
  11. When I think of Degas it is ballet dancers that come to mind. I think it possible to appreciate and enjoy the work even though I doubt I would have enjoyed his company.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fun60
      for a young woman who loved ballet, I also thought Degas' ballet themes were very special. In fact I can hardly remember any other artists who took ballet seriously, except perhaps Mary Cassatt.

      Delete