Thank you to Sarah Belmont for her Musée d’Orsay material about my favourite works. Who were these masterpieces selected by: the curators? the viewing public? the author?
Berthe Morisot, The Cradle, 1872,
Musée d’Orsay.
The Cradle was an intimate depiction of Morisot’s sister Emma and Emma’s newborn baby, Blanche. At 31 Morisot (1841-95) herself was still single, not marrying Eugène Manet until 1874 and becoming a mother herself only in 1879. The Cradle was shown at the first Impressionist Exhibition (1874) with little reaction, except that a few critics were sensitive to its delicate palette. It did not sell until 1930, when the Louvre acquired it from the artist’s family.
1872 Musée d’Orsay.
In late 1871 Manet (1832–83), who couldn’t paint while serving in the Franco-Prussian war and the Paris Commune, was able to resume working and reconnect with his former models. He’d met fellow artist Berthe Morisot at the Louvre in 1868. Manet made a dozen portraits of Morisot, who married his younger brother and joined the Impressionist movement in 1874. This one shows her clad in trendy black in late C19th fashion, and holding a bouquet of violets. This was testimony to Manet’s admiration for Spanish masters, especially Diego Velázquez.
Gustave Caillebotte, The Floor Scrapers (1875),
Musée d'Orsay.
Caillebotte (1848–94) drew from his academic training to depict an everyday scene of labourers at work. His approach to perspective may have been traditional and his subjects reminiscent of Greek statues, but the content of the painting did not please the jury of the 1875 Paris Salon, which considered it vulgar. However the 28-year-old artist presented the work at the second Impressionist Exhibition (1876). Critics then were less than welcoming. Emile Zola thought the painting was anti-artistic and so accurate that it made it bourgeois. It was first donated to the French State by Caillebotte’s family in 1894, moved to the Louvre in 1929 and to Musée d’Orsay in 1986.
Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Dance at Moulin de la Galette 1876
Musée d’Orsay
This is undoubtedly one of Renoir’s (1841–1919) most important works. The artist presented it at the 1877 Impressionist Exhibition. It was purchased 2 years later by Gustave Caillebotte who bequeathed it to the French State in 1894. Art critic Georges Rivière, who was seen in the painting said: “It’s a page of history, a precious monument to Parisian life painted with great accuracy.” Even if Renoir included some of his painter friends in the composition, his goal was to capture not a scene of his private life but the atmosphere of the actual Moulin de la Galette in the Montmartre district. Three areas are depicted: the seated characters in the foreground having a conversation, the crowd behind them dancing, and the band performing in an enclosure at the back. The blurry effect created by this layering was not to everyone’s taste then but today it would be hard to deny the modernity of the piece.
Paul Cézanne, The Card Players 1890–5,
Musée d’Orsay.
In the 1890s, Cézanne (1839–1906) tackled the subject of card players, which he may have borrowed from Caravaggio and from the Le Nain brothers. Of the 5 versions of The Card Players Cézanne painted, what strikes one first in this one is the symmetrical posing of his models, peasants whom the painter would see at the Jas de Bouffan, his father’s property near Aix-en-Provence. The bottle on the table marks the centre of the composition and accentuates the silent face-off between the two opponents.
I have excluded the Monet, Rodin, Degas, van Gogh, Sérusier, Gauzi, Burne-Jones, Gauguin, Redon, Claudel, Derain and Rousseau. Now I would like you readers to read the original article, What to See at the Musée d’Orsay in Paris, and share with me views about which masterpieces you love and which you are less keen on, if any.
Read 25 Masterpieces at the Musée d’Orsay in Paris by Sarah Belmont, July 8 2024 Musée d’Orsay, Paris
Portrait of the Artist's Mother by Whistler is powerful because it reminds me of my own mother in later years. It is serious, sad and respectful.
ReplyDeleteJoe
DeleteHaving a personal connection to a work makes it understandable and. memorable. In 1990 when I asked my father what he remembered from art history in high school in 1939, he immediately replied Fighting Temeraire by Turner.
One of my favourite art museums in Paris.
ReplyDeleteRachel
DeleteMusee d'Orsay is one of my favourites too. The difference is you can pop in any old time whereas I have to plan a year in advance .
I enjoyed reading 'What to See at the Musée d’Orsay in Paris' - thank you for the link
ReplyDeletejabblog
DeleteDespite all the spam, vulgar politics and repetetive ads, sometimes we find wonderful links on line.
Hello Hels, The Morisot is quite charming; however, it reminds me of the opening scene of a rather bizarre but very interesting movie, Who Slew Auntie Roo, starring Shelly Winters. When we finally got to see it, Winters' baby was considerably less cherubic. The Caillebotte is also wonderful--it in some ways anticipates the American Ashcan school. I especially like the contrast between the rough floor work and laborers, and the dainty boiserie and ironwork behind them.
ReplyDelete--Jim
p.s. What happened to that Manuel I post? I wrote a comment, but then the whole thing seems to have disappeared.
Parnassus
DeleteWe valued the Morisot because it is sensitive, nod. Until women artists in France were well accepted, scenes like this might have seemed too domestic and trivial. The Caillebotte, on the other hand, is full of rugged labour.
I haven't had a computer for 5 days :( Damn it.
Hello again, Look at this image from Auntie Roo:
ReplyDeletehttps://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNTdlNGFjZmMtZTcyMi00Mjg2LWI3YjgtMjFjZjZjNzM5MmI5XkEyXkFqcGdeQWRpZWdtb25n._V1_.jpg
This is so similar to Morisot's painting there is almost no way that they are not related. Often writers of humor or horror are cultured and well read, and one constantly finds classical inspiration for what the later writer has inverted to the outward eye, while paying homage to the original image or reference. --Jim
Parnassus
DeleteInspiration yes. Homage no.
I very much like Caillebotte's Floor Scrapers and the Renoir has always been a favourite of mine, and I think for many people.
ReplyDeleteAndrew
DeleteRenoir captured the wonderful social life of the later 19th century superbly.. the music, dancing, gorgeous party clothes, drinks, decorated trees. The excitement was palpable... and still is.
Caillebotte had a different view of life altogether.
Very nice works, I like the floor scrapers.
ReplyDeleteRiver
DeleteMe too. I have seen men labouring before eg sailors on a ship. But this is the first time I have seen a close look at 3 half naked men scraping a timber floor. It seems realistic.
I cannot visit Paris without going to the Musee D'Orsay. Choosing a favourite is just impossible. I can and have spent hours gazing at those magnificent paintings.
ReplyDeleteFun60
DeleteIt would be almost impossible to pick a favourite from the entire collection, nod. So I have limited myself to the paintings in What To See at the Musee d'Orsay. I included The Card Players by Cezanne because 1) I am a passionate card player and 2) the two men are carefully concentrating on their game.
The Floor Scrapers are my choice, Hels. Very interesting art.
ReplyDeleteMargaret
DeleteA very interesting theme in the fabulous decades of Gay Paris (c1870-WW1).
Some nice art by names I am not familiar with but that's ok, I still enjoyed the post
ReplyDeleteJo-Anne
ReplyDeleteThat is the beauty of blogs. I read the title and if it is not my cup of tea, I move on. If it sounds interesting but I know nothing about the topic, I often learn a lot.
Sometimes (rarely) I will just look at photos on a post and not read it but when I do I will say so because there have been times when my concentration isn't good and reading is difficult
DeleteJo-Anne
ReplyDeleteNod. And I have another reason for sometimes focusing on the images. In my old age, my visual memory is now better than my memory of text.